Proposed Text
CHAPTER 26
REGULATIONS FOR HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH
Part I
General Provisions
6VAC15-26-10. Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
"Board" means the Board of Corrections.
"Department" means the Department of Corrections.
"Director" means the Director of the Department of Corrections.
"Human research" means any systematic investigation utilizing human subjects which may expose such human subjects to physical or psychological injury as a consequence of participation as subjects and which departs from the application of established and accepted therapeutic methods appropriate to meet the subjects' needs.
"Human Subject Research Review Committee" or "HSRRC" means the Department of Corrections committee responsible for (i) reviewing all submitted research projects for completeness and compliance with the Regulations for Human Subject Research, with all applicable Department of Corrections operating procedures and with all applicable state and federal regulations pertaining to human subject research; (ii) approving or denying submitted research proposals; (iii) monitoring all approved research projects for adherence to the scope of the research that was approved; and (iv) reporting on all research projects approved, all research projects denied and the findings of all approved research projects. The composition of the HSRRC and its responsibilities shall be stated in Part II of this chapter.
"Legally authorized representative" means (i) the
parent or parents having custody of a prospective subject, (ii) the legal
guardian of a prospective subject, or (iii) any person or judicial body
authorized by law or regulation to consent on behalf of a prospective subject
to such subject's participation in the particular human research. For the
purposes of this definition, any person authorized by law or regulation to consent
on behalf of a prospective participant to his participation in the particular
human research shall include an attorney-in-fact appointed under a durable
power of attorney, to the extent the power grants the authority to make such a
decision. The attorney-in-fact shall not be employed by the person,
organizational unit or agency conducting the human research and shall not be
authorized to consent to nontherapeutic non-therapeutic medical
research. No official or employee of the organizational unit or agency
conducting or authorizing the research shall be qualified to act as a legally
authorized representative.
"Minimal risk" means that the risks of harm anticipated in the proposed research are not greater, considering probability and magnitude, than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations or tests.
"NontherapeuticNon-therapeutic
research" means human research in which there is no reasonable expectation
of direct benefit to the physical or mental condition of the human subject.
"Organizational work unit" means any unit, facility, office or district within the Department of Corrections, such as prisons, correctional centers, correctional field units, correctional work centers, probation and parole districts or offices, detention centers, diversion centers, units supervised by a manager who reports directly to the Deputy Director of Administration. Each organizational work unit is managed by an organizational unit head such as a warden, superintendent, chief probation and parole officer or manager.
"Participant" or "human participant" means
a living individual whether personnel or inmate, probationer, or parolee
employee or offender about whom an investigator a researcher
(whether professional or student) conducting research obtains (i) data through
intervention or interaction with the individual, or (ii) identifiable private
information. "Intervention" includes both physical procedures by
which data are gathered and manipulations of the participant or participant's
environment that are performed for research purposes. "Interaction"
includes communication or interpersonal contact between investigator researcher
and participant.
"Private information" includes information about behavior that occurs in a context in which an individual can reasonably expect that no observation or recording is taking place, and information which has been provided for specific purposes by an individual and which the individual can reasonably expect will not be made public. Private information must be individually identifiable in order for obtaining the information to constitute research involving human participants.
"Research" means the systematic development of knowledge essential to effective planning and rational decision making. It involves the assessment of current knowledge on conceptual problems selected, statement of those problems in researchable format, design of methodologies appropriate to the problems, and the application of appropriate analytical techniques to the data. Research findings should provide valuable information to management for policy options.
"Research agreement" means the document signed by the principal researcher, research project supervisor or advisor and the HSRRC indicating the principal researcher and research project supervisor or advisor agree to conduct their research project in the manner in which the research project was approved by the HSRRC, including compliance with this chapter, all applicable Department of Corrections operating procedures, all applicable state and federal laws and regulations, the research project timeline and any conditions imposed by the HSRRC. A copy of the research agreement is incorporated by reference with this chapter.
"Researcher" means an individual who has professional standing in the pertinent field or is supervised directly by such an individual.
"Research project" means the systematic collection of information, analysis of data, and preparation of a report of findings.
"Research proposal" means the document or documents completed by the principal researcher outlining: (i) information about the researchers, including contact information, affiliations and funding sources; (ii) the human research to be performed, including purpose, methodology, informed consent, time frame and Department of Corrections resources required; and (iii) any endorsements. The research proposal must be submitted to and approved by the HSRRC. Research proposals are to be limited to twenty pages (not including bibliographies, curriculum vitae, letters of endorsement, copies of surveys or instruments to be used, copies of external Institutional Review board approvals and voluntary informed consent forms.) A suggested template for a research proposal is incorporated by reference with this chapter.
"Voluntary informed consent" means the knowing consent of an individual so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice without undue inducement or any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, or other form of constraint or coercion. Voluntary informed consent forms shall not include any language through which the human subject waives or appears to waive any of his or her legal rights, including any release of any individual, facility, agency or agents thereof from liability or negligence. The human participant shall sign all voluntary consent forms confirmed by an acceptable witness. With regard to the conduct of human research, the basic elements of information necessary to such voluntary informed consent shall include:
1. A fair explanation to the individual of any procedures to be followed and their purposes, including identification of any procedures which are experimental;
2. A description of any attendant discomforts and risks reasonably to be expected;
3. A description of any benefits reasonably to be expected;
4. A disclosure of any appropriate alternative procedures that might be advantageous for the individual;
5. An offer to answer any inquiries by the individual concerning the procedure; and
6. An instruction that the individual is free to withdraw his or
her voluntary informed consent and to discontinue participation in the
human research at any time without prejudice to him.
A copy of the Voluntary Informed Consent form is incorporated by reference with this chapter.
6VAC15-26-20. Applicability.
This chapter shall apply to any individual, group, or agency conducting research, which uses human participants within the Virginia Department of Corrections, including any facility, program or organization owned, operated, funded, or licensed by the department.
6VAC15-26-30. Policy.
A. No human research may be conducted without informing the participant or his legally authorized representative in writing of the risks, procedures, and discomforts of the research. The voluntary informed consent of the participant or his legally authorized representative to participate in the research must be documented in writing and supported by signature of a witness not involved in the conduct of the research, except as provided in 6VAC15-26-102. Arrangements shall be made for those who need special assistance in understanding the consequences of participating in the research.
B. Each human research review activity shall be approved by
a committee composed of representatives of varied backgrounds who shall assure
the competent, complete and professional review of human research activities.
No offender shall be subjected to experimentation or participation in
research against their will.
C. Nontherapeutic Non-therapeutic research using
institutionalized participants shall be is prohibited unless it
is determined by the research review committee HSRRC that such nontherapeutic
non-therapeutic research will not present greater than minimal risk.
D. The individuals conducting the research shall be
required to notify all participants of research of the risks caused by the
research which are discovered after the research has concluded. Research
involving known and substantive physical, mental or emotional risk to the
participants, including the withholding of any prescribed program or treatment
is specifically prohibited.
E. Department of Corrections studies, program evaluations,
and routine data analyses for management purposes are exempt from this policy.
Medical research shall only be conducted in accordance with Department of
Corrections Operating Procedure 701.1 Health Services Administration, which is
incorporated by reference with this chapter.
F. The burden of proof for review by any committee shall be
with the principal researcher. Research shall not interfere with the
rights of offenders or Department of Corrections employees.
G. Proper precautions must be exercised for the protection of the research participants rights and for the overall safety and security of the public, the researcher and the Department of Corrections.
H. Research shall not interfere significantly with ongoing programs or operations of the Department of Corrections.
I. The research findings shall not identify individual participants. The confidentiality and anonymity of all offenders and other parties engaged in the research will be maintained.
J. Researchers are required to notify all participants of risks caused by the research that are discovered after the research has concluded.
K. Each human research activity shall be reviewed and approved by the HSRRC.
L. No human research activity involving the Department of Corrections shall be initiated without a research proposal reviewed and approved by the HSRRC.
M. Each submitted research proposal must be accompanied by a research agreement signed by the principal researcher, or research project supervisor or advisor.
N. All research proposals, research agreements, and accompanying documentation must be submitted to the HSRRC electronically via e-mail.
O. The burden of proof for review by the HSRRC shall be with the principal researcher
P. Research shall not commence until all procedural and applicable human research reviews and approvals are completed and the Department of Corrections Director or applicable Deputy Director signs an approval memorandum on behalf of the Department. This approval memorandum and necessary information describing the project shall be sent to the appropriate Department of Corrections organizational unit head, regional director, and principal researcher.
Q. This chapter does not apply to Department of Corrections studies, program evaluations, and routine data analyses for management purposes.
Part II
Human Research Review Committees
6VAC15-26-40. Certification process. (Repealed.)
A. Organizational units seeking to conduct or sponsor human
research are required to submit statements to the department assuring that all
human research activities will be reviewed and approved by a human research
review committee. Organizational units shall report annually to the director
giving assurance that a committee exists and is functioning. These reports
should include a list of committee members, their qualifications for service on
the committee, their organizational unit affiliation and a copy of the minutes
of committee meetings.
B. Prior to the initiation of a human research project,
organizational units shall also send to the director a one-page summary
containing the following information:
1. Name, address, telephone numbers, and title and
affiliation of principal researcher;
2. Name of person who will supervise the project, if
different from the principal researcher;
3. Funding source, if any;
4. Date the proposal was submitted to the appropriate human research
review committee;
5. Title of project;
6. An objectives statement of the proposed project with
anticipated results;
7. Methodology describing in a concise manner the research
design, sampling strategy, and analytical techniques to be used and indicating
the effects of the research methodology, if any, on existing programs and
organizational unit operations;
8. The voluntary informed consent statement;
9. Time frame indicating proposed beginning and ending
dates;
10. Department resources required, including personnel,
supplies and materials, equipment, workspaces, access to participants and
files, and any other resources that the researcher will require from the
department or its subsidiaries; and
11. Project endorsement for student research. Letters or
other documents must be attached to indicate endorsement of the project by the
academic advisor or other appropriate persons.
C. Each person engaged in the conduct of human research or
proposing to conduct human research shall associate himself with any
organizational unit having a committee, and such human research shall be
subject to review and approval by the committee in the manner set forth in this
section.
D. The director may inspect the records of the committee.
E. The chairman of the committee shall report as soon as
possible to the head of the organizational unit and to the director any
violation of the research protocol which led the committee to either suspend or
terminate the research.
PART II
HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH REVIEW COMMITTEE (HSRRC)
6VAC15-26-50. Composition of research review committees.
A. Each committee The HSRRC shall have at least five
three members, appointed by the organizational unit head Department
of Corrections Director or designee, with varying backgrounds to provide
complete and adequate review of activities commonly conducted by the
organizational unit researchers. The committee HSRRC shall
be sufficiently qualified through the experience and diversity of its members,.including
consideration of race, gender and cultural background. In addition to
possessing the professional competence necessary to review specific activities,
the committee must be able to ascertain the acceptability of applications and
proposals in terms of organizational unit commitments and regulations, if
applicable by law; standards of professional conduct and practice; and
community attitudes. If a committee regularly reviews research that has an
impact on an institutionalized or other vulnerable category of participants,
the committee shall have in its membership one or more individuals who are
primarily concerned with the welfare of these participants and who have appropriate
experience to serve in that capacity.
1. The HSRRC shall not be comprised entirely of men or of women.
2. The HSRRC shall not be comprised entirely of members from one organizational work unit.
3. The HSRRC shall have at least one member who is not otherwise affiliated with the Department of Corrections and is not an immediate family member of a person who is affiliated with the department.
B. No committee shall consist entirely of men or women, or
entirely of members of one profession. At least one member shall be an
individual whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas (e.g., lawyers,
ethicists, members of the clergy). At least three members shall be individuals
who are not otherwise connected with the department. In addition to
possessing the professional competence necessary to review research proposals,
the HSRRC must be able to ascertain the acceptability of research proposals in
terms of organizational work unit commitments, these regulations, applicable
Department of Corrections operating procedures, and any applicable state and
federal law or regulation, standards of professional conduct and practice, and
community attitudes.
C. Each committee shall include at least one member who is
not otherwise affiliated with the organizational unit and who is not part of
the immediate family of a person who is affiliated with the organizational
unit.
D.C. No member of a committee the
HSRRC shall participate in the committee's HSRRC's initial or
continuing review of any research project in which the member has a
conflict of interest (defined as having direct involvement in or department
approval authority over the proposed human research or otherwise having a
conflict of interest under applicable Virginia law). The committee HSRRC
has responsibility for determining whether a member has a conflicting interest.
E.D. A committee The HSRRC may, at
its discretion, invite individuals with competence in special areas to assist
in the review of complex issues which that require expertise beyond
or in addition to that available on the committee to the HSRRC.
These individuals may not vote with the committee HSRRC.
F.E. A quorum of the committee HSRRC
shall consist of a majority of its members. including at least one
member whose primary concerns are in nonscientific areas. If a quorum
cannot be established (or cannot meet within the established time frames) from
the existing committee HSRRC, the organizational unit head
Director or designee, may replace temporarily an active committee member
with an alternate to the degree needed to establish a quorum.
G. One member of the committee shall be designated as
secretary of the committee and shall take and prepare formal minutes of each
meeting.
H. The committee and the organizational unit shall
establish procedures and rules of operation necessary to fulfill the
requirements of this chapter.
6VAC15-26-60. Elements of each committee's review process.
(Repealed.)
A. No human research shall be conducted or authorized by an
organizational unit or agency unless such committee has reviewed and approved
the proposed human research project giving consideration to:
1. The adequacy of the description of the potential benefits
and risks involved and the adequacy of the methodology of the research;
2. The degree of the risk and, if the research is
nontherapeutic, whether it presents greater than minimal risk;
3. Whether the rights and welfare of the participants are
adequately protected;
4. Whether the risks to the participants are outweighed by
the potential benefits to them;
5. Whether the voluntary informed consent is to be obtained
by methods that are adequate and appropriate, and whether the written consent
form is adequate and appropriate in both content and language for both the
research and participants of the research;
6. Whether the persons proposing to supervise or conduct the
particular human research are appropriately competent and qualified;
7. Whether criteria for selection of participants are
equitable, especially in research regarding the future development of mental or
physical illness;
8. Whether the research conforms with such other
requirements as the board may establish; and
9. Whether appropriate studies in the nonhuman systems have
been conducted prior to the involvement of human participants.
B. Each committee shall review and approve projects to
ensure conformity with the approved proposal at least annually.
C. Research shall be approved by the committee which has
jurisdiction over the participant. When cooperating organizational units
conduct some or all of the research involving some or all of the participants,
each cooperating organizational unit is responsible for safeguarding the rights
and welfare of human participants and for complying with this chapter, except
that in complying with this chapter organizational units may enter into joint
review, rely upon the review of another qualified committee, or make similar
arrangements aimed at avoiding duplication of effort. Such arrangements may be
made by the committee chairperson with the approval of a majority of the
members present at a meeting of the committee.
D. The committee shall consider completed research
proposals within 60 days after submission to the committee's chairman. In order
for the research to be approved, it shall receive the approval of a majority of
those members present at a meeting in which a quorum exists. A committee shall
notify investigators and the organizational unit in writing of its decision to
approve or disapprove the proposed research activity, or of modifications
required to secure committee approval.
E. The committee shall develop a written procedure to be
followed by a participant who has a complaint about a research project in which
he is participating or has participated.
F. Any participant who has a complaint about a research
project in which he is participating or has participated shall be referred to
the chairperson of the committee who shall refer it to the committee to
determine if there has been a violation of the protocol.
G. The committee shall require periodic reports. The
frequency of such reports should reflect the nature and degree of risk of each
research project.
6VAC15-26-61. Duties and Responsibilities.
A. The HSRRC shall establish procedures and rules of operation necessary to fulfill the requirements of this chapter.
B. The HSRRC shall review all submitted research proposals for the following:
1. Completeness, including:
a. researcher information
(1) name of principal researcher
(2) affiliation
(3) mailing address
(4) telephone number
(5) e-mail address
(6) names of all other researchers participating in the research project
(7) name of research project supervisor or advisor, if different from B.(1). above
(a) telephone number
(b) e-mail address
(8) funding source
(9) curriculum vitae of principal
researcher, all persons named as researchers and research
project supervisor or advisor
b. research proposal information
(1) date research proposal submitted to HSRRC
(2) title of research proposal
(3) purpose of research proposal
(4) methodology
(a) research design
(b) sampling methods
(c) methods of analysis
(5) discussion of the research proposal in the context of relevant literature
(6) discussion of the benefits to the Department of Corrections as well as the field of study
(7) copies of any surveys or instruments to be used
(8) voluntary informed consent forms
(9) timeline for the research project
(10) Department of Corrections resources
required (including personnel, supplies, materials,
equipment, workspace, access to participants and
files, etc.)
(11) External Institutional Review Board
(IRB) approval (including academic IRBs, research
group IRBs, and government IRBs); all external IRB
approvals must be received before the
HSRRC will initiate review of a submitted research
proposal
c. letters of endorsement
2. compliance with Regulations for Human Subject Research, all applicable Department of Corrections operating procedures, and all applicable state and federal laws and regulations; compliance includes, but is not limited to:
a. the researchers' ability to obtain the appropriate security clearances to enter an organizational work unit
b. the researchers' adherence to an organizational work unit's standards for appropriate attire, including dress or wardrobe, jewelry, hair, grooming, body piercings and tattoos
c. the researchers' ability to pass an organizational work unit's security screening process for contraband, including weapons of any kind, alcohol, drugs of any kind, cellular phones, other electronic devices, tobacco products (including lighters and matches) and any other items deemed as potentially adversely impacting the safety and security of the Department of Corrections, organizational work unit, department staff, research participants or other offenders, the researchers or the general public
3. adherence to basic research standards, including:
a. credentials - The principal researcher shall have academic or professional standing in the pertinent field or job-related experience in the areas of study or be directly supervised by such a person
b. ethics -The research shall conform to the appropriate standards of ethics of professional societies such as the American Psychological Association, the American Sociological Association, the National Association of Social Workers or other equivalent society.
c. protection of rights - The principal researcher is responsible for the conduct of his or her staff and assumes responsibility for the protection of the rights of participants involved in the research project.
d. confidentiality or anonymity - Research project information given by participants to the researcher or researchers shall be confidential or anonymous depending on the study design. This does not preclude the reporting of results in aggregated form that protects the identity of individuals, or the giving of raw data to the Department of Corrections for further analysis. The confidentiality of any such raw data shall be monitored by the department. Persons who breach confidentiality or anonymity shall be subject to sanctions in accordance with applicable laws, policies and procedures.
e. participant incentives -The opportunity to participate in research is considered sufficient incentive for participation. The offering of additional incentives is prohibited without specific, written approval from the applicable Department of Corrections Deputy Director. Sentence reduction or pecuniary compensation are always prohibited as incentives.
4. determination if the research proposal is subject to the human research review requirements of §32.1-162.16 through §32.1-162.20 of the Code of Virginia
5. agreement with Department of Corrections research procedures
a. The principal researcher and research project supervisor or advisor must submit a separate, signed, written research agreement when submitting their research proposal indicating that the principal researcher, research project supervisor/advisor, and all other researchers and staff under their supervision who are associated with the research project have read, understand and agree to abide by Department of Corrections research procedures.
b. The research agreement shall establish a timeline for the research project and the specific date when the principal researcher shall submit the final report to the HSRRC.
c. In the case of student research, the student's academic advisor must sign the research agreement indicating endorsement of the research project.
C. After reviewing each submitted, complete research proposal, research agreement and accompanying documentation, the HSRCC will vote to approve or deny the research proposal.
D. A research proposal shall be approved by the HSRRC when a majority of the quorum of the HSRRC votes to approve the research proposal.
E. In the event a research proposal is denied, the HSRRC shall notify the principal researcher of the reason or reasons for denial and any requested clarifications, edits, updates or additions that can be made to the research proposal. The principal researcher may re-submit a revised research proposal with these requested clarifications, edits, updates and/or additions. The HSRRC will then review the re-submitted revised, complete research proposal in accordance with 6VAC15-26-50 B. of this chapter.
F. Upon approval of a research proposal by the HSRRC, the HSRRC shall prepare a Research Brief summarizing the Research Proposal with any comments. The research brief will be provided to the Director or the appropriate deputy director for review and approval.
G. Upon approval of the research brief by the Director or the appropriate deputy director, the HSRRC shall provide an approval memorandum and necessary information describing the research project to the organizational work unit head, regional director and principal researcher.
H. the HSRRC shall retain a separate electronic file for each submitted research proposal. Each electronic file shall contain:
1. the original submitted research proposal
2. the research agreement
3. any accompanying documentation
4. any re-submitted revised research proposals
5. the research brief
6. the approval memorandum
7. any progress reports
8. the final report
9. All communication between the HSRRC, principal researcher, research project supervisor or advisor, the Department of Corrections Director, and the applicable deputy director, regional director and organizational unit head pertaining to the research project.
I. At the time the research agreement is signed, the HSRRC shall establish due dates for progress reports to be provided by the principal researcher. These progress reports will inform the HSRRC of the status of the research project and any difficulties encountered that might delay or preclude completion of the research project.
J. The HSRRC shall establish research priorities consistent with the needs of the Department of Corrections.
K. The HSRRC shall regulate the number and timetable of research projects so as to not disrupt the normal functioning of any Department of Corrections operational work unit.
L. Upon receipt of a complaint from an organizational unit head or participant, the HSRRC will investigate to determine if there has been a violation of these regulations, Department of Corrections operating procedures, the research proposal, the research agreement or any applicable state or federal laws or regulations.
M. If the HSRRC determines that a principal researcher, researcher, research project supervisor/advisor or staff supervised by them has violated any of these regulations, Department of Corrections operating procedures, the research proposal, the research agreement or any applicable state or federal laws or regulations, the HSRRC may terminate the research project at any time.
N. The HSRRC shall submit to the Governor, the General Assembly and the Department of Corrections Director or his designee, at least annually a report on the human research projects reviewed and approved by the HSRRC, including any significant deviations from the approved research projects.
6VAC15-26-70. Kinds of research exempt from committee review.
(Repealed.)
Research activities in which the only involvement of human
participants will be in one or more of the following categories are exempt from
this chapter unless the research is covered by other sections of this chapter:
1. Research conducted in established or commonly accepted
educational settings, involving commonly used educational practices, such as:
a. Research on regular and special education instructional
strategies; or
b. Research on the effectiveness of, or the comparison
among, instructional techniques, curriculum or classroom management methods.
2. Research involving solely the use and analysis of the
results of standardized psychological, educational, diagnostic, aptitude, or
achievement tests, if information taken from these sources is recorded in such
a manner that participants cannot be reasonably identified directly or through
identifiers linked to the participants.
3. Research involving survey or interview procedures, unless
responses are recorded in such a manner that participants can be identified
directly or through identifiers linked to the participants, and either:
a. The participants' responses, if they became known
outside the research, could reasonably place the participant at risk of
criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the participants' financial
standing, employability, or reputation; or
b. The research deals with sensitive aspects of the
participant's own behavior, such as sexual behavior, drug or alcohol use,
illegal conduct, or family planning.
4. Research involving solely the observation (including
observation by participants) of public behavior, unless observations are
recorded in such a manner that participants can be identified directly or
through identifiers linked to the participants, and either:
a. The observations recorded about the individual, if they
became known outside the research, could reasonably place the participant at
risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the participant's
financial standing, employability, or reputation; or
b. The research deals with sensitive aspects of the
participant's own behavior such as sexual behavior, drug or alcohol use,
illegal conduct, or family planning.
5. Research involving solely the collection or study of existing
data, documents, records, or pathological or diagnostic specimens, if these
sources are publicly available or if the information taken from these sources
is recorded in such a manner that participants cannot be identified directly or
through identifiers linked to the participants.
6. Research involving solely a combination of any of the
activities described in this section.
6VAC15-26-71. Reports.
A. The principal researcher must submit progress reports to the HSRRC by the dates agreed upon in the research agreement. These progress reports must be submitted electronically via e-mail.
B. The principal researcher must submit a final report to the HSRRC. The final report must be submitted electronically via e-mail.
C. The HSRRC reserves the right to reproduce the final report for official Department of Corrections use only.
6VAC15-26-80. Expedited review procedures for certain kinds
of research involving no more than minimal risk. (Repealed.)
A. The committee may conduct an expedited review of a human
research project which involves no more than minimal risk to the participants
if (i) another institution's or agency's human research review committee has
reviewed and approved the project or (ii) the review involves only minor
changes in previously approved research and the changes occur during the
approved project period. Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be
carried out by the committee chairperson or one or more experienced reviewers
designated by the chairperson from among members of the committee. In reviewing
the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the
committee except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research
activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the
nonexpedited procedure set forth in 6VAC15-26-60.
B. Each committee which uses an expedited review procedure
shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals
which have been approved under the procedure.
C. Research activities involving no more than minimal risk
and in which the involvement of human participants will only be in one or more
of the following categories (carried out through standard methods) may be
reviewed by the research review committee through the expedited review
procedure.
1. The study of existing data in the form of records on
department personnel or inmates, probationers, or parolees, automated or other
records.
2. Research on individual or group behavior or
characteristics of individuals, such as studies of perception, attitudes or
interaction patterns, where the investigator does not manipulate participants'
behavior and the research will not involve stress to participants.
6VAC15-26-81. Records Maintenance.
A. The principal researcher shall maintain records adequate to enable the Department of Corrections to ascertain the status of the research project at any given time.
B. The principal researcher shall maintain completed Voluntary Informed Consent forms in a secure location for at least three years.
6VAC15-26-90. Informed consent. (Repealed.)
A. No human research may be conducted in the absence of
voluntary informed consent subscribed to in writing by the participant or by
the participant's legally authorized representative except as provided for in
subsection F of this section. If the participant is a minor otherwise capable
of rendering voluntary informed consent, the consent shall be subscribed to by
both the minor and his legally authorized representative. An investigator shall
seek such consent only under circumstances that (i) provide the prospective
participant or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or
not to participate and (ii) minimize the possibility of coercion or undue
influence. The information that is given to the participant or the
representative shall be in understandable language.
B. No individual shall participate in research unless
subsection A of this section is met for each individual. The consent by a
legally authorized representative shall be subject to the provisions of
subsection C of this section. No voluntary informed consent shall include any
language through which the participant waives or appears to waive any of his
legal rights, including any release of any individual, institution, agency or
any agents thereof from liability for negligence. Notwithstanding consent by a
legally authorized representative, no person shall be forced to participate in
any research project. Each participant shall be given a copy of the signed
consent form required by 6VAC15-26-30 A except as provided for in subsection F
of this section.
C. No legally authorized representative may consent to
nontherapeutic research unless it is determined by the committee that such
nontherapeutic research will present no more than a minor increase over minimal
risk to the participant. No nontherapeutic research shall be performed without
the consent of the participant.
D. The committee may approve a consent procedure which
omits or alters some or all of the elements of informed consent set forth in 6VAC15-26-10,
or waives the requirement to obtain informed consent provided the committee
finds and documents that:
1. The research involves no more than minimal risk to the
participants;
2. The omission, alteration or waiver will not adversely
affect the rights and welfare of the participants;
3. The research could not practicably be performed without
the omission, alteration or waiver; and
4. Whenever appropriate, the participants will be provided
with additional pertinent information after participation.
E. Except as provided in subsection F of this section, the
consent form may be either of the following:
1. A written consent document that embodies the elements of
informed consent required by 6VAC15-26-10. This form may be read to the
participant or the participant's legally authorized representative, but in any
event, the investigator shall give either the participant or the representative
adequate opportunity to read it before it is signed; or
2. A short form written consent document stating that the
elements of informed consent required by 6VAC15-26-10 have been presented
orally to the participant or the participant's legally authorized
representative. When this method is used, there shall be a witness to the oral
presentation. Also, the committee shall approve a written summary of what is to
be said to the participant or the representative. Only the short form itself is
to be signed by the participant or the representative. However, the witness
shall sign both the short form and a copy of the summary, and the person
actually obtaining consent shall sign a copy of the summary. A copy of the
summary shall be given to the participant or the representative in addition to
a copy of the short form.
F. The committee may waive the requirement for the investigator
to obtain a signed consent form for some or all participants if it finds that
the only record linking the participant and the research would be the consent
document and that the principal risk would be potentially harmful resulting
from a breach of confidentiality. Each participant will be asked whether he
wants documentation linking him to the research, and the participant's wishes
will govern. In cases where the documentation requirement is waived, the
committee may require the investigator to provide participants with a written
statement explaining the research.
6VAC15-26-91. Publication Rights.
A. Researchers are not permitted to publish beyond the approved research proposal without further review and approval from the HSRRC.
B. The researcher shall furnish the HSRRC with an electronic copy of the published research findings.
C. The Department of Corrections shall be permitted to use the data collected in the research project and to reproduce the materials as they are published.
D. Without the explicit written approval of the researcher, the Department of Corrections should not publicly distribute any dissertation or thesis material that the researcher has not published or presented publicly or professionally.
E. Without prior approval from the HSRRC, research conducted by employees or agents (including but not limited to interns, volunteers, contractors, and vendors) of the DOC is the property of the Department of Corrections and cannot be published without the approval of the Director or the appropriate Deputy Director.
6VAC15-26-100. Committee records. (Repealed.)
A. Documentation of all committee activities shall be
prepared and maintained and shall include the following:
1. Copies of all research proposals reviewed, evaluations
that may accompany the proposals, approved sample consent documents, progress
reports submitted by researchers, reports of injuries to participants, and
correspondence related to the research;
2. Minutes of committee meetings which shall be in
sufficient detail to show attendance at the meetings; actions taken by the
committee; the vote on these actions, including the number of members voting
for, against, and abstaining; the basis for requiring changes in or for
disapproving research; and a written summary of the discussion of controversial
issues and their resolution;
3. Records of continuing review activities;
4. Copies of all correspondence between the committee and
the investigators;
5. A list of committee members;
6. Written procedures for the committee; and
7. Statements of significant new findings provided to the
participants.
B. The records required by this chapter shall be retained
for at least three years, and records relating to research which is conducted
shall be retained for at least three years after completion of the research.
All records shall be accessible for inspection and copying by authorized
employees or agents of the department at reasonable times and in a reasonable
manner.
6VAC15-26-101. Research Exempt From HSRRC Review.
A. Department of Corrections studies, program evaluations and routine data analyses from management purposes.
B. research conducted by the Department of Correctional Education in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving commonly used educational practices, such as:
1. research on regular and special education instructional strategies
2. research on the effectiveness of, or the comparison among, instructional techniques, curriculum or classroom management methods
C. research involving required agency survey procedures, unless responses are recorded in such a manner that participants can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the participants, and either:
1. the participants' responses, if they become known outside the research, could reasonably place a participant at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to a participant's financial standing, employability or reputation; or
2. the research deals with sensitive aspects of a participant's own behavior, such as sexual behavior, drug or alcohol use, illegal conduct or family planning.
D. research involving solely the collection or study of existing data, documents, records or pathological or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publically available or if the information taken from these sources is recorded in such a manner that participants connot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the participants.
6VAC15-26-102. Waiver of Signed Voluntary Informed Consent form.
A. The HSRRC may waive the requirement for the researcher to obtain a signed voluntary informed consent form for some or all participants in a research project if it finds that the only record linking the participant and the research would be the consent form and that the principal risk would be potentially harmful resulting from a breach of confidentiality.
B. Each participant will be asked whether he or she wants documentation linking him or her to the research, and the participant's wishes will govern.
C. In cases where the documentation requirement is waived, the HSRRC shall require the researcher to provide participants with a written statement explaining the research.
6VAC15-26-110. Mandatory reporting. (Repealed.)
Each research review committee shall submit to the
governor, the General Assembly, and the director or his designee at least
annually a report on the human research projects reviewed and approved by the
committee, including significant deviations from the proposals as approved.
Part III
Role of the Department, Director, and the Board
6VAC15-26-120. Role of the department, director, and the board.
A. The director, or his designee, shall establish and
maintain records of organizational unit the HSRRC assurances,
annual reports, and summary descriptions of research projects to be reviewed by
the board.
B. The director, or his designee, shall review
communications from committees the HSRRC reporting violations of
research protocols which led to suspension or termination of the research to
ensure that appropriate steps have been taken for the protection of rights of
human research participants. The board shall be kept informed.
C. The director shall arrange for the printing and dissemination of copies of this chapter.
Part IV
Applicability of State and Federal Policies
6VAC15-26-130. Applicability of state and federal policies.
A. No statement in this chapter shall be construed as limiting in any way the rights of participants in research under regulations promulgated by the board pursuant to §§ 53.1-5 and 53.1-5.1 of the Code of Virginia.
B. Human research that is subject to policies and regulations for the protection of human participants promulgated by any agency of the federal government shall be exempted from this chapter. Annual certification shall be made that exempted projects have complied with the policies and regulations of federal agencies to the director and the board.
6VAC15-26-140. Applicability of federal policies. (Repealed.)
Human research which is subject to policies and regulations
for the protection of human participants promulgated by any agency of the
federal government shall be exempted from this chapter. Annual certification
shall be made to the director and the board that exempted projects have
complied with the policies and regulations of federal agencies.