Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology [18 VAC 30 ‑ 21]
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
7/17/25  2:18 pm
Commenter: Phil Helman

100% Support for The Pending Resolution
 

As Chief Executive Officer and Owner of Adler Therapy Group, a private therapy company located in the Hampton Roads (Virginia) area which employs over 60 speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and provides speech services to close to 1,000 pediatric patients a week, I am writing in support of the petition to eliminate 18VAC30-21-60(A)(2)(c).?  

 Simply put, there is no reason why an SLP in the state of Virginia should not be able to gain a full, unconditional license from the state of Virginia upon graduation from an accredited school and having passed the Praxis. This is the standard for new physical and occupational therapy graduates and standards for speech-language pathologists should not be any different.? 

 As the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) itself says: 

 “The scope of practice (evaluation, diagnosis, treatment) for CFs and SLPs is the same whether an individual holds a provisional or a full license.?The primary difference is the title of the license (e.g., provisional).?In addition, for those who are pursuing clinical fellowship, they need to comply with the supervision standards required to obtain the CCC and state licensure.?Therefore, the varied licensure title is largely a distinction without difference and fails to acknowledge that provisional licensees have earned a master’s or doctoral degree and completed supervised clock hours of clinical practicum as required by Medicare and under most state laws.”  

 The Virginia code follows ASHA’s supervision requirements, which boils down to only requiring a half hour of direct and a half hour of indirect supervision per week, resulting in a minimum of thirty-six hours of supervision during the entire nine-month ASHA fellowship process.  While ATG has robust mentorship in place for CFs, the reality is many CFs barely interact with their supervisors and often are not even working in the same building.  The simple fact is that the CF experience is never uniform and varies widely based on the structure of each work environment, and on the discretion of the supervisor involved.  While some CF experiences are great, many are just going through the motion for nine months. 

 This issue is critical for our industry for the following reasons: 

 

  1. The standards for credentialling with most commercial and federal payers are directly related to licensure.?I.e., CFs cannot see some patient populations unrestricted because both commercial and federal insurances, such as MEDICARE and TRICARE, won't credential them with a provisional license.?This causes excessive administrative and financial burdens on both the provisional licensees, and the companies which employ them.  

 

  1. Provisional licensees can do anything a fully licensed SLP can do as long as certain supervision steps are in place.?Unfortunately, this creates a burden on the supervisor involved.?Again, more administrative and financial burdens are created for no reason. 

 

  1. PATIENT CARE.?The demand for speech therapy services throughout Virginia is strong. Virginia is currently ranked 42nd in the country in the ratio of SLPs to 100,000 residents (https://www.asha.org/siteassets/surveys/audiologist-and-slp-to-population-ratios-report.pdf). In fact, there are hundreds of children waiting for services across Hampton Roads alone, with some clinics on a six-month to one-year wait list.?We should be doing everything possible to get these children the care they need,and eliminate?obstacles such as provisional licenses and the related red tape of credentialling and supervision that cause many clinics and healthcare systems to refrain from hiring those with provisional licenses.   

 

Simply put, if insurance carriers won’t credential CFs, they can’t be employed and patients won’t be able to get the services they need. 

The biggest risk we face besides patient care is the risk to the speech therapy profession itself.?Applicants for graduate school will likely decrease after the latest Medicare announcement because potential applicants don’t want to have to deal with the fact that after spending thousands of dollars on a graduate education, their employability is limited by a byzantine set of rules and regulations. We are already facing intense pressure to meet demand.?We need to nurture this profession and avoid anything that might give someone pause as they consider this career. 

Bottom line, when a new physical or occupational therapist graduate comes to work for us, they have no limitations on their work and who they can treat.?That does not mean we don't mentor, coach, and support their career path.?However, we can mentor them as any company in any industry does with new hires and graduates and avoid the regulatory hurdles which pop up when a practicing therapist does not have a full license.?  

In closing, as listed above, it is clear that the present licensure process for SLPs is no longer practical and needs to be changed. The ultimate beneficiaries for this change would not just be new speech graduates but the ever-growing population of children and adults who need speech therapy services but whose interventions/therapy are delayed by a lack of staff who are credentialed to see them. 

I can't emphasize how important it is to solve this issue now, both for our SLPs and the patients we serve. The petition involved is a common sense solution to an important issue and I encourage the board to accept it. 

Sincerely, 

Philip R. Helman 

CEO 

Adler Therapy Group 

757-647-5517 

CommentID: 236969