Action | Requirement for jurisprudence examination |
Stage | NOIRA |
Comment Period | Ended on 12/16/2015 |
I am totally opposed to this exam. There are to many questions out there that must be answered before even considering this proposal. This seems to be another step to regulate something that does not need regulation. Below are some questions I have.
Are we the only ones to have to do this? Do other boards require similar action? Does medicine require this? Why every 3 years? Why not every 5 or 10 or 20? Are the regulations changing so fast we need a 3 year update?
It seems we now get email updates about regulation changes that we never got in the past. I feel more up to date than I ever have in the past. Is this not working?
How much will it cost? Is this another tax from the BOD? Who is giving the exam?
Until I see a detailed proposal clarifying all aspects of the proposal, I will be totally opposed. Thanks