Agencies | Governor
Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
State Water Control Board
 
chapter
Virginia Pollution Abatement Regulation and and General Permit for Poultry Waste Management [9 VAC 25 ‑ 630]
This action is exempt from the executive branch review process.
Action Develop requirements that will address concerns regarding transfer and off-site management of poultry waste in the Commonwealth.
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ends 8/21/2009
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
8/15/09  7:41 am
Commenter: Aaron Otte (Supporting Shenandoah Riverkeeper)

Please Pass The Poultry Litter Regulation
 

Dear Secretary Bryant,                                                                    June 6, 2009 
 
 

I support the Shenandoah River Keeper’s recommendations to regulate poultry litter use in the Shenandoah watershed and across Virginia. 
 

I am generally NOT a fan of government regulation.  However, Virginia’s population is exploding; and its acreage is not.  The commonwealth’s rising population (almost double in 30 years) and the world’s increasing demand for Virginia agriculture are growing beyond our watersheds’ ability to support them without government intervention.     
 

American farmers are the heroes that have fed the continent and the world for the last two centuries.  But at some point we must recognize that our rivers and our land have limits.  If we cannot lessen the number of people that need to be fed, we have to adjust the methods we use to meet that need.    
 

On principle, I do not advocate adding to the body of Virginia laws.  However, I am a realist.  There appears to be no end in sight to population growth, and more people will always require more government intervention.   Really, the concept couldn’t be simpler.  
 

On that basis, I support the Shenandoah River Keeper’s regulatory proposals.  Our rivers just plain need the protection.   
 
 

Aaron Otte

Reston, VA

(703) 796-6060

aaron.otte.ctr@usmc.mil 
 

CommentID: 9602