Agencies | Governor
Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Department of Environmental Quality
Air Pollution Control Board
Regulation for Emissions Trading [9 VAC 5 ‑ 140]
Action Reduce and Cap Carbon Dioxide from Fossil Fuel Fired Electric Power Generating Facilities (Rev. C17)
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ends 3/6/2019
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
3/5/19  1:18 pm
Commenter: James Czenczek, WestRock Covington Mill

Oppose Re-Proposed “Regulation for Emissions Trading” as Written

March 5, 2019


Karen G. Sabasteanski

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

1111 East Main Street, Suite 1400

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, VA 23218


RE: Oppose Re-Proposed “Regulation for Emissions Trading” as Written

Dear Ms. Sabasteanski,

I am writing to provide comments in opposition to the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQs) and the Air Pollution Board regarding the Commonwealth of Virginia’s re-proposed “Regulation for Emissions Trading” for the CO2 Budget Trading Program as it is currently drafted. 

I work at the WestRock Paper Mill in Covington, which has been in operation for over 100 years.   The Mill is the economic backbone of our community, supporting over 1000 jobs and injecting hundreds of millions of dollars a year into our local economy.  I am concerned that the proposed regulations, and specifically the treatment of biomass, could have a serious and negative impact on the mill.

DEQ has said that the intent of the rule is to focus on fossil fuels, but as written, it would apply to biomass (and other non-fossil fuel sources) when they are cofired with fossil fuels.  Biomass is a carbon-neutral fuel source, and it should not be included in a rule designed to deal with fossil fuels.  With that in mind, the rule should be amended to specifically exclude non-fossil fuel emissions.

Additionally, the exemption for industrial facilities should not be restricted to existing facilities.  If the restriction remains, the rule should have language that clearly allows for exempted facilities to conduct maintenance and upgrades without losing their exemption.

I appreciate the opportunity to comment.


James Czenczek

CommentID: 69616