Agencies | Governor
Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Counseling
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Professional Counseling [18 VAC 115 ‑ 20]
Action Requirement for CACREP accreditation for educational programs
Stage NOIRA
Comment Period Ends 7/1/2015
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
6/10/15  8:51 am
Commenter: Ruth B. Palmer, PhD, Eastern University

Oppose CACREP
 

Dear Board members,

I am Co-Chair of the Counseling Psychology Department at Eastern University in St. Davids, Pennsylvania.  In addition to regional accreditation, our masters programs in Clinical Counseling and School Counseling hold national accreditation by the Masters in Psychology and Counseling Accreditation Council (MPCAC).  This organization is committed to accrediting high quality counseling programs, with a rigorous review process based on professional standards commensurate with our state licensure board for professional counseling.  Thus CACREP is not the only accrediting body for counselor education programs.  Many universities are choosing to pursue MPCAC because it emphasizes standards that CACREP lacks.

I join counseling professionals from across the country to urge you to stop the proposed counselor licensing regulations that would require graduation from a CACREP-accredited program for licensure in Virginia.  A careful look at the data will reveal that counselors who have graduated from CACREP programs are not more effective in their work with clients or in their service to their communities. There is also no evidence to support that counselors from CACREP-accredited programs are more ethical or more helpful to clients or the communities within which the counselors practice. Furthermore, there is a great need now for mental health services. A regulation limiting practice would not serve the people of Virginia well given that a majority of master’s level counselor training programs are not CACREP-accredited. A restriction such as this would negatively impact current students and alumni from non-CACREP affiliated VA programs; negatively impact the public by reducing access to qualified counselors; negatively impact relocation of qualified and competent counselors from non-CACREP programs; reduce overall services available to VA residents; and increase cost of graduate education. Even within the American Counseling Association (ACA), the largest national counseling association, there is significant opposition to the CACREP-only restrictions highlighted in the rationale for this regulatory change.

The people of Virginia need a strong Board that protects their rights to access quality mental health care. I urge you to stop this proposal and ensure that the people of Virginia will continue to rely on the strength of your licensing Board, and not on the agenda of an independent organization with no public oversight or accountability.  Please note, a similar attempt to monopolize licensure of counselors was undertaken (and subsequently overturned) in New Jersey.  We hope your state does avoids the mistakes made there and keeps open the licensing of counselors to those who meet your state standards, rather than the interests of only one organization—and an organization that does not represent the breadth of the counseling profession.

Sincerely,

Ruth B. Palmer, Ph.D.                                                  

Co-Chair, Counseling Psychology Dept, Eastern University

CommentID: 40162