Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Virginia Department of Health
 
Board
State Board of Health
 
chapter
Regulations for Licensure of Abortion Facilities [12 VAC 5 ‑ 412]
Action Regulations for Licensure of Abortion Facilities
Stage Emergency/NOIRA
Comment Period Ended on 2/15/2012
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
2/14/12  10:36 pm
Commenter: Gina Devasahayam

I OPPOSE THESE REGULATIONS
 

 

I am writing regarding the Board’s development of permanent regulations for women’s health centers in the Commonwealth.
 
I request that the Board hold a public hearing in the next phase of the regulatory process. I also request that the Board appoint a regulatory advisory panel in order to supply professional and technical expertise to the Board. I specifically request that experts in the areas of [women's health, first trimester abortion and health care facility regulation] be appointed to serve on this panel.
 
The Board of Health must seek and follow guidance regarding what is medically appropriate and in the interest of patient health for the regulation of women’s health centers, because the current temporary regulations are neither medically appropriate nor in the interest of patient health.
 
·       The current temporary regulations are unnecessarily burdensome and medically inappropriate. 


 

·       The Board of Health has the ability to revise the regulations to reflect medically appropriate standards.


 

·       Regulations for women’s health centers should be based on evidence-based medical practices that advance the public health.


 

·       This will maintain access to essential reproductive healthcare from trusted medical providers. 


 

·       I am deeply concerned that a number of the provisions of the temporary regulations pose threats to patient access to health care and confidentiality.


 

The physical plant requirements:
 
·       The temporary regulations place architectural requirements on existing health care facilities from three chapters of a manual called the 2010 Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities.

 

·       These Guidelines are being misapplied – they are intended to apply only to new construction, not to existing facilities.

 

·       Existing women’s health centers have been offering safe care for many years, so there is no need to require them to entirely rebuild their facilities under new construction requirements. Forcing them to do so could reduce access to care.


 

·       Abortion is one of the most common surgical procedures sought by women in the United States and is an essential part of the comprehensive range of women’s reproductive health care. Abortion is one of the safest medical procedures performed in the United States.


 

·       Women’s health centers offer an array of preventive reproductive healthcare services to tens of thousands of women as well as men in the Commonwealth. Medically inappropriate and unnecessarily burdensome regulations would limit access to a wide range of preventive reproductive healthcare services including life-saving cancer screenings, family planning and sexually transmitted infection testing and treatment, as well as early abortion.


 

Patient/provider confidentiality:
The regulations that affect patient and provider safety and confidentiality are also deeply troubling. 


 

First, Department of Health employees are permitted to review a wide variety of  records, with no protections for patient confidentiality, or provider and patient safety.


 

To allow unredacted patient records to be reviewed without any confidentiality protections violates patient privacy and will do nothing to improve patient safety.


 

Moreover, Department employees would even be permitted to have a list of patients that have received care at the facility during the past 12 months and potentially to talk to any person “under the facility’s control, supervision or direction” while they are present. This is problematic because [for example: it implies current patients could be interviewed by inspectors on the premises, etc.].


 

Department representatives are permitted to arrive on the premises at any time for inspections, and the facility is required to give them access to the center without any consideration of whether the business is open that day or whether the visit is within normal business hours.


 

Conclusion


 

·       The Board of Health is charged with protecting the public safety of the Commonwealth and expanding access to health care.


 

·       The Board of Health has the responsibility to amend these regulations so that they comport with medical standards of care and ensure access to reproductive health care. 


 

·       If the regulations meet medical standards of care, women’s health centers will be able to continue to provide safe, accessible, comprehensive health care in Virginia.


 

 
CommentID: 22679