Action | Practice of dry needling |
Stage | Proposed |
Comment Period | Ended on 2/24/2017 |
I write as both a Physical Therapist and as a patient, in support of the most of the DN (Dry Needling) legislation that is pending. I do not feel that it is necessary for a DPT to require a MD or DO oral or written permission/prescription to perform any physical therapy treatment if that practioner has the qualified training. The continuing education required for potential practitioners of dry needling is extensive and exhaustive, in order to, first and foremost, protect the patient from harm. As a patient who has experienced DN as administered by a qualified PT, I can also report that its effects are remarkable, and serve to decrease muscle tension, making ongoing related PT treatment more effective. Regarding the comparison to acupuncture, I have experienced both (though for different conditions), and the clinical rationale & clinical application are much different. Only the needle used in the treatment are similar in nature.
I support the passage of this legislation, so that qualified and well-trained Physical Therapists can continue to provide this valuable treatment, but would like to see that the requirement for physician permission removed from the regulations.
Dr. Eric Jorde