Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Medical Assistance Services
 
Board
Board of Medical Assistance Services
 
chapter
Waivered Services [12 VAC 30 ‑ 120]
Action Elderly or Disabled with Consumer Direction Waiver Updates
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 12/7/2012
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
12/7/12  2:34 pm
Commenter: Athena Baker, Ameri Care Plus

Proposed Waiver Services Changes
 

proposed regulations for the EDCD waiver

Remove the regulation that requires that providers obtain a proffessional referance for a nurse aide applicant that has only worked for 1 employer. Providers have found that many employers are unresponsive to reference requests. The requirement will eliminat a pecentage of potentially qualified workers because of the inability to get a response from a former employer. Given the shortage of nurse aides this would further limit the pool of potential workers needed to cover cases. We ask that personal references continue to be allowed.

Remove the requirement that nurse aides "physically attend" 12 hours of in-service education anually.Providers should be allowed to continue to utilize printed material and other mediums. It is effective and sufficient to require RN supervisors to provide instruction during home visits, when nurse aide deficiencies in knowledge are identified that are recipient specific.

Remove the requirement that signatures times and dates be placed on the record no later than 7 calendar days from the last date of service. In many cases it will be impossible to comply with standard, and in cases in which the signature cannot be obtained in this time frame, ther is no remedy for the provider, preventing the provider from the abillity to bill for sevices that were appropriately rendered. For example, the client is hospitalized or leaves town without notice and does not return home for many weeks. There are many other examples providers can give in which it takes many weeks and longer to obtain a signature from a recipient.

CommentID: 24624