I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on the regulation of Barbering and Cosmetology Regulations which are licensed by the Board for Barbers and Cosmetology in Virginia.

My understanding of this policy is limited to information found online and within public forums. However, it appears that a reduction of hours would not have a significant impact on consumer satisfaction nor the health of the public. Additionally, more hours can result in higher prices for consumers. Although 1,500 hours appears to be the normal hours across several state requirements, there are states that are already set at 1,000 hours. Virginia would not be “paving” the way for less Cosmetology requirements. I was not able to find ant research that would suggest that the services provided in New York are any less of quality than in Virginia.

Many of the comments on this thread focus on the concept of “hair styles.” Styles have changed over the years and will continue to change. The state does not require these cosmetologists to return and retrain on “styles” so why have such an emphasis on training for style. Let the independent organizations hiring stylists train them on how to “style” hair. My main concern is for the state to continue to focus on training that revolves around the health and safety practices involved with cutting hair.

Additionally, other countries, such as the UK, do not require a governmentally issues license to cut hair. It is optional. While researching this topic, I was not able to find any research that suggested that the quality of services were any worse due to the lack of governmental licensing for cosmetology.

If this regulation passes, I would recommend keeping the same amount of training that is focused on the cleanliness of the workplace, sanitation efforts, hygiene, and the health/safety of both the cosmetologist and customer.

This comment is not suggested on behalf of any political party or interest group. 

Thank you.