"This amendment should have little impact on the family or family stability."

I implore those who are making these decisions (since no public hearing will be held), to consider the impact this inclusive clause will make on the total number being covered in a household. A family of three or more should not be under obligation to pay for a family of five or more or six or more... or whatever the more is.

Plainly stated, while I do think this is a great step, I just hope that this will be looked at a little more and that additional details will be released before a final judgment is made.