The original premise describing the appropriate location to provide services for an individual under and ECO or a TDO is both out of date and flawed. In order to take into account the rapidly changing landscape of the services available for individuals in crisis and reflect the ongoing capacity issues with the State Psychiatric Hospitals several changes are warranted in the draft:
If the restriction on placing someone who is on a TDO (TDO issued to the facility in question) is based upon the need for “security” and clinical capability – then the facility should be judged on that basis and the TDO “stipulation” attached to their licenses should reflect that.
If, however, the restriction is based on the fact that the 23-hour program is not intended to “house” someone for the 72 hour duration of a TDO then the CSB should note that placement will be made in the attached CSU as soon as a bed becomes available. If it is unlikely that a bed will be available in the specified amount of time, the CSB may choose to seek a different location.
While it within the purview of Medicaid to set limits on payment this seems to be contrary to the State’s intent to improve the functionality of the Community Crisis System. As we read these restrictions: