Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Historic Resources
 
Board
Board of Historic Resources
 
chapter
Regulations Governing Contextualization of Monuments or Memorials for Certain War Veterans [17 VAC 5 ‑ 40]
Action Promulgation of Regulations Governing Contextualization of Monuments or Memorials for Certain War Veterans
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 6/7/2024
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
5/24/24  10:39 am
Commenter: Luke (Ayman) Kalda - Student

Support for New The Regulations
 

I am writing to express my support for the new regulations mandated by Chapters 1100 and 1101 of the 2020 Acts of Assembly concerning the contextualization of war monuments and memorials. These regulations, developed under the guidance of the Board of Historic Resources, are a crucial step forward in providing local governing bodies with the necessary framework to thoughtfully and respectfully contextualize monuments and memorials dedicated to war veterans.

The importance of these regulations is underscored by the events that took place in Richmond, VA, where a dozen statues and other memorials were removed from various locations throughout the city. The Robert E. Lee statue, which was once the largest Confederate statue in the United States, was removed from Monument Avenue in 2021. Additionally, in response to widespread protests against racial injustice in 2020, Mayor Stoney ordered the emergency removal of the street's other Confederate monuments.

While these actions were driven by a need to address the pressing issues of racial injustice and public safety, the abrupt removal of these statues created significant controversy and division within our community. It was sad to see all these monuments and statues removed and gone after years of passing by them almost every day, but public safety must come first. We must learn from this experience and take proactive measures to avoid such a scenario in the future.

I commend the thorough approach taken in these new regulations, particularly the detailed guidance on the appearance, location, and ownership of the markers. This structured approach ensures that each monument or memorial is handled with the dignity and respect it deserves while allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of our shared history.

It is also important to recognize that every locality has a different history and unique ways of expressing that history. Therefore, these new regulations should be somewhat flexible to accommodate these differences. By allowing for local nuances and perspectives, we can ensure that the contextualization process is meaningful and reflective of the community's unique heritage.

The application requirements and approval process outlined in these regulations are essential for maintaining consistency and fairness across different jurisdictions. By standardizing these procedures while allowing for local flexibility, we can ensure that all communities have the opportunity to engage in meaningful dialogue and make informed decisions about how to best honor and contextualize these historical markers.

As a resident of Richmond who deeply values our history and the contributions of our war veterans, I believe that contextualizing these monuments and memorials will provide a more inclusive narrative and foster a greater appreciation for the complexities of our past. We must recognize not only the achievements but also the broader historical context in which these events occurred.

I encourage the continued support and implementation of these regulations with somewhat of local flexibility.

Thank you!

Luke Kalda

CommentID: 222658