Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Environmental Quality
 
Board
State Water Control Board
 
chapter
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Designation and Management Regulations (formerly 4VAC50-90) [9 VAC 25 ‑ 830]
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
4/24/24  9:31 pm
Commenter: Scott Graham - Graham Leadership Growth LLC

Re: “Petition for Establishment of a Regulation or Policy Interpreting the Definition of a Nontidal
 

I am writing in opposition to changing how Virginia defines nontidal wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act

It is not in our Commonwealth's interest to reduce protections for our communities based on the legal determinations from the Sackett v. EPA, which I do not think applies to our situation.  The petitioner wants to reduce our state's protections for wetlands, which play a critical role in our ecosystems by providing habitat, preventing erosion, filtering pollutants, and reducing flood risks in tidal areas.   

Finally, empowering localities to protect their most sensitive lands from development impacts is important to protecting water quality and reducing nutrient and sediment runoff to the Chesapeake Bay.  

 Thank you for the opportunity to share my views and advocate for the continued protection of wetlands and the Chesapeake Bay.  The Petition seeks to limit local government discretion and should be denied.  

Respectfully, Scott A. Graham

CommentID: 222532