Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Marine Resources Commission
 
Board
Marine Resources Commission
 
chapter
[4 VAC 20 ‑ ]
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
8/21/23  1:52 pm
Commenter: Jacques van Montfrans

Menhaden ban
 

So often the general public and resource managers overlook the fact that ecosystems are governed by complex interactions between the various species (including humans).  And all too often, decisions are made regarding those interactions that benefit only humans.  Menhaden exploitation is a prime example.  This species (although technically owned by Commonwealth residents) is heavily exploited to benefit one human component, Omega Protein, and to the detriment of a tremendous number of other species.  As VMRC knows, menhaden populations play a vital role for so many species in the Bay as both predator and prey.   They are at the center of the conflict between perceived human benefits and the multitude of species which are either consumed by menhaden or those that prey upon menhaden as a rich and vital source of food.  Despite the economic value of the menhaden fishery with all of its lobbyists and political connections, managers at VMRC should not ignore the serious consequences that over exploitation has on other species linked to this important resource.  This meeting is focused on deciding to curtail the greedy exploitation of menhaden by Omega Protein or banning exploitation for the benefit of ospreys, an iconic bird of prey that has scientifically been shown to critically depend on the menhaden for nesting success.  Research shows that voting in favor of Omega Protein will have major consequences for breeding failure similar to levels not seen since the affects of DDT on osprey populations.  I strongly urge VMRC to make the right choice and ban the exploitation of menhaden for the benefit of the osprey population.  Such a ban will also have far reaching implications for a multitude of other species as well.  I urge you to do the right thing and base your decision on the science and not on political favoritism.  Thank you!

CommentID: 219561