I wonder what has prompted an interest in changing the regulations regarding sedation in dentistry?  Have there been an increase in the numbers of morbidity and mortality with dentistry?  Do we even have data to go on regarding the numbers and types of practioners who administer intravenous sedation to their patients?

If there is no data then I believe no regulation should change.  However, if there is credible evidence that more stringent education and case documentation is necessary, then I'm all for it.

Is there a clause in the new regulation that allows long time practioners the permission to continue their practice (and if so, why)?

Those of us who administer intravenous sedation know how valuable the service is to our community and would hate to see it taken away without credible evidence to do so.  We who practice intravenous sedation are willing to help the Board gather data so as to make an informed decision.  Please make sure you have hard data before changing a useful regulation.

Wayne Remington, D.D.S.

Charlottesville, VA