Department of Planning and BudgetAn official website of the Commonwealth of Virginia Here's how you knowAn official websiteHere's how you know

Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology [18 VAC 30 ‑ 21]
Action Regulatory Reduction 2024
Stage Fast-Track
Comment Period Ended on 1/29/2025
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
1/28/25  2:47 pm
Commenter: Daniel

In support of new licensing without CCC-A requirement
 

As others have suggested -- and as others might anecdotally report --  the requirement for new audiologists in Virginia to hold a CCC-A in order to obtain licensure likely deters some competent providers from practicing in the Commonwealth. Should a prospective licensee prove completion of all degree requirements from an accredited college or university, as well as a passing score on the Praxis, then ASHA or ABA certification ought to be seen as redundant. 

Processing of certificate applications is estimated to take 4-6 weeks. Therefore, for new practitioners, a certificate requirement extends the Virginia licensing process unnecessarily, putting further strain on individuals competing to join the work force.

The criteria for reinstatement of one's CCC-A appear intentionally burdensome, as if to deter providers from considering dropping the certificate when its value fails to meet the cost of annual renewal. Currently, a Praxis retake is required along with a $371-$400 reinstatement fee. Therefore, for experienced providers outside the Commonwealth who have dropped their certificate but wish to join our workforce, the CCC-A requirement can add two months or more of processing time to the licensing process. 

I support approving new audiologist license applications without the requirement of a CCC-A, arguing that such a change would attract more professionals to the Commonwealth by removing a superfluous obstacle without sacrificing generally accepted standards for clinical competency. 

CommentID: 230172