Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Board
Board for Barbers and Cosmetology
 
chapter
Barbering and Cosmetology Regulations [18 VAC 41 ‑ 20]
Action Lower Cosmetology Training to 1,000 Hours
Stage Final
Comment Period Ends 7/3/2024
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
6/27/24  2:44 pm
Commenter: Elizabeth Darling, Darling and Dapper Studio LLC

Oppose reduction of required licensing hours for cosmotologists
 

While streamlining the path to cosmetology licensure might seem appealing, reducing the required training hours will absolutely have unintended consequences for both public safety and the profession itself. Here's just a few reasons maintaining current training standards is crucial:

  • Client Safety: We perform a variety of procedures that can impact a client's health and well-being. Chemical applications can cause allergic reactions or damage hair if not administered correctly. Fewer training hours could translate to a less thorough understanding of proper technique, product knowledge, and potential risks.  

  • Skill Development: Cosmetology is a skilled trade. Mastering cutting techniques, coloring processes, and hairstyling takes time and practice. Reducing training hours could limit a new cosmetologist's ability to provide high-quality services, potentially leading to dissatisfied clients and damage to the profession's reputation.

  • Salon Standards: Salons rely on cosmetologists who possess a strong foundation in all aspects of the field. This includes not just technical skills, but also sanitation practices, business knowledge, and effective communication with clients. Fewer training hours could lead to new graduates who are unprepared for the demands of a professional salon environment.

  • Devaluing the Profession: Reducing training requirements could be seen as diminishing the value of a cosmetology license. A strong educational foundation helps to ensure that cosmetologists are taken seriously as professionals and can command competitive wages.

  • Focus on Quality, Not Quantity: The emphasis should be on ensuring graduates have a comprehensive understanding of the field, rather than simply completing a set number of hours. Current training programs may benefit from revisions to optimize efficiency, but reducing the total time without addressing the curriculum could be detrimental.  Especially when salon owners are often focused on running the business as a whole, vs. having time to essentially train an apprentice to become proficient enough to make a living. 

In conclusion, maintaining current cosmetology training standards protects both the public and the profession. While streamlining the process might have some appeal to those who don’t understand the ins and outs of this industry, suffice to say - it's important to prioritize safety, skill development, and ensuring new cosmetologists are well-equipped for success.

 

CommentID: 226099