I understand the concern with the ties to ASHA for the initial credentials/licensing. However, the board needs to consider the criteria that the initial license offers compared to the suggested 'requirement to hold a master's degree in speech-language pathology, communication disorders, speech and hearing science, or equivalent.'
Currently, initial license requirements include:
By requiring this component (ASHA CCCs) just for the initial license, the Board is protecting the clients served as well as the qualifications and readiness of the clinician.
As proposed, a master's degree in speech-language pathology, communication disorders, speech and hearing science, or equivalent could be provided by any college/university - it does not specify that it is an accredited program.
It should be noted that ASHA CCCs are not required for renewal of one's BASLP license.
Others have referenced OTs and PTs not needing such requirements. Based on what I have found, each of these professions have similar requirements tied to their national association/board in order to ensure the quality and completion of their program.