Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Psychology
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Psychology [18 VAC 125 ‑ 20]

2 comments

All comments for this forum
Back to List of Comments
3/15/22  10:09 pm
Commenter: Basharat Shah

important suggestion from the petitioner
 

I am the petitioner of this petition. Thank you so much for publishing my petition for further action. I suggest that board reads the reviews that patients have left for all these court appointed adult and child psychologist on various MD review websites, including healthgrades.com, ratemds.com, sharecare.com and vitals.com. Each reviewer has a very distressing story to share. Clearly there is an abuse of the system going on on a large scale and this needs to be stopped ASAP. I believe that only Board has the capacity to put this ongoing abusive process to an end.

CommentID: 120773
 

3/19/22  11:00 pm
Commenter: Michael Moates, MA, QBA, LBA, QMHP-Trainee

Support of Professor Basharat Shah, MD Petition
 

Global Institute for Behavior Practitioners and Examiners

Hello, my name is Michael Moates I am a Licensed Behavior Analyst, Adjunct College Professor of Psychology, and non-profit leader. I am here representing my organization GIBPE which is a non-profit that recognizes the challenges of general specialties of mental health working with various populations.

As with many specialities in the behavioral and mental health realm, it is important to make sure that those who testify as expert witnesses are not general practitioners but rather specialized in this subject area. 

Psychologists who testify in the court system need to be able to address multiple areas including forensic assessment, Virginia law, clinical psychology (since Virginia licenses Applied Psychologists), etc.

A general psychologist may not be aware of the consequences of what they say in court and this is extremely important when evaluating cases because you have to way the values of one situation versus another.

I would take the petition a step further to:

Determine the qualifications of an expert witness, in this case a psychologist, and the requirements of practice.

Many states and organizations do this do this including:

American Board of Professional Psychology - https://www.dsh.ca.gov/Publications/docs/Regulations/2018_01_05/AB_1962_Education_and_Training_Draft_Regulations.pdf

American Psychological Association - https://www.apa.org/practice/guidelines/forensic-psychology

California - https://www.dsh.ca.gov/Publications/docs/Regulations/2018_01_05/AB_1962_Education_and_Training_Draft_Regulations.pdf

https://www.law.cornell.edu/regulations/california/Cal-Code-Regs-Tit-9-SS-4751

Texas - https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=21&ch=465&rl=18

Some psychologist finish their doctorate in 5 years and there is no way they have the ability to cover everything that is needed to testify in court. Making a wrong recommendation can have life altering consequences and the board should take that into consideration when making its decision.

Very Respectfully,

Michael Moates, MA, QBA, LBA, QMHP-Trainee

Executive Director, Global Institute for Behavior Practitioners and Examiners

CommentID: 120824