Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Board
Board for Professional and Occupational Regulation
 
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
9/27/20  4:22 pm
Commenter: Jensen Andersen

SUPPORT Continued Regulation of Interior Design in Virginia
 
My name is Jensen Andersen and I live in Virginia. I write this comment in STRONG support of the continued regulation of the interior design profession in Virginia.
 
I currently live in Arlington, Virginia, and practice interior design under an architecture firm that does work in the DMV region. The majority of my work includes multi-family residential design, while I also have experience in commercial design. I originally studied architecture, and became an interior designer through practice, finally completing my license in 2019. There is a difference between a certified interior designer and a designer that does interior design for fun. Interior designers with a license can be trusted by those person's hiring them that they have the best knowledge and consideration for any project they are under taking. Having a license elevates job security for many women who are a majority in the industry, who otherwise may not be taken seriously in the profession of the building industry. The building industry is male dominated, and being a woman in the profession whose knowledge is taken seriously per a licensing process is something that should not be revoked. Please consider every surface that surrounds you and know that an interior designer was involved in that decision. Buildings and interiors don't make themselves. If you eliminate the license you are eliminating the value women, who again make of the majority of the interior design industry, hold in the building industry. I worked very hard to become a licensed professional. I am able to relate to other building industry professionals through my knowledge and devaluing that is a disservice to the community and society at large.
 
– In order to hold a position on a corporate board for a “Professional Corporation,” the employee must be licensed or certified in their profession by the Commonwealth. Eliminating the interior design regulation would prevent interior designers from serving on the board of architectural-interior design and interior design-only firms.
 
– RFPs (Request for Proposals) and RFQs (Request for Qualifications) in the Commonwealth of Virginia and for Federal Government Projects that include Interior Design Services require that the Interior Designer providing these services be a Certified Interior Designer. Eliminating the regulation would bar Virginia interior designers from submitting for these proposals.
 
– Job postings for Interior Designers in the Commonwealth and for Federal departments typically require an Interior Designer to be a Certified Interior Designer. Eliminating the regulation would exclude Virginia interior designers from these opportunities.
 
In Virginia, of the 1,272 interior design establishments in the Commonwealth, 96% are small businesses of four or fewer employees. 83% of these small businesses are women or minority owned. Eliminating interior design regulation would crush these entrepreneurs and small businesses because of the reasons listed in this comment.
 
Eliminating the Interior Design statute would also harm the Commonwealth. Being a Certified Interior Designer in the Commonwealth provides the public with knowledge that a minimum set of requirements, including education, experience, and testing, has been met. Certified Interior Designers do complex design drafting work in large public and code-regulated spaces like hotels, hospitals, corporate offices, and multifamily housing where public life-safety is implicated. CIDs have a knowledge of building codes, standards, and other laws and regulations that are essential to the safe construction of public and other code-regulated buildings.
 
In light of the pandemic and as Virginians get back to their stores, businesses, and corporate offices, it is Certified Interior Designers who are redesigning and space planning these environments to mitigate COVID risk.
 
Our health is influenced by everything we touch in interior spaces. Disease-causing pathogens, like those that spread COVID-19, can be transferred from person to person, but also through everyday objects like office door handles, restroom grab bars, and schoolroom desks. It is critical to have interior environments that can protect our health by reducing pathogen transmission. Interior designers specify materials and finishes in 90% of residential and commercial construction and renovations and these professionals will be key in protecting the US against the virus.
 
Regulating interior design is a sensible practice. Washington D.C., Maryland, Georgia, Tennessee, and Kentucky, all have statutes in place for the regulation of the title and/or practice of Interior Design. In total, 27 states and two federal jurisdictions regulate interior design. No jurisdiction has ever deregulated the practice of interior design.
 
The interior design statute is not restrictive or protectionist. The title protection law—enacted during the 1990 Session of the General Assembly—does not restrict the scope of practice and serves as the framework for the voluntary certification program. While only certified interior designers may use the title “Certified,” any individual may contract with a client to render services as an interior designer, interior decorator, or similar practitioner if the client so chooses.
 
Eliminating the voluntary regulation of interior design in Virginia is bad public policy. Continued regulation is vital to the practice, profession, industry, consumers, and the public’s health, safety, and welfare. I ask you to not eliminate the regulation of this profession.
 
Thank you.
Jensen K. Andersen
CommentID: 86691