Concerns with 1 VAC 20-60-20, as amended, are as follows:

[1] In paragraph (B)(4), have the courts resolved the issue of being a legal resident of VIrginia in order to circulate petitions? I thought that they had decided that is not a constitutional requirement. Perhaps this is still up for appellate review.

[2] I have the same concerns about the voter printing his/her name as I discussed in the comments for proposed 1 VAC 20-50-20. I renew those same concerns with regard to 20-60-20, in particular, but not limited to, proposed paragraph (D)(4).

[3] With regard to paragraph (E), I have the same concern as I raised for proposed 20-50-20(E), namely that it should be reworked and placed with the other material omissions.