Scenario 1. of this proposed guidance memo cites and example of a builder with 3 lots "immediately adjacent to each other". I understand the relevance of "immediately adjacent to each other" and agree with the outcome however what would be the outcome of this scenario if the same builder was constructing on 3 lots, collectively disturbing greater than 1ace that were not immediately adjacent to each other? Would CGP coverage no longer be required? A singular builder constructing multiple lots at the same time is a very real scenario, and should not be treated as proposed scenario 2. Additional clarification to scenario 1 would be appreciated.