I've submitted two documents. The first is the letter detailing my comments and the second is the draft plan with sticky notes. I'd like to supplement those comments with the following:

The 30,000 foot view of the draft plan is that it’s a solid framework to proceed. However, engagement is missing and that is a significant gap in an outreach and engagement plan. It’s obvious that those writing the draft plan have little experience with or understanding effective engagement and those things that make it valuable, both from a self-serving perspective and from a good government perspective. These shortcomings will not be fixed with this outreach and engagement plan but it’s important to raise it with DCR at every available opportunity.

Perhaps the most expedient way to address the engagement shortcomings in the draft plan are to take advantage of the wealth of expertise in the community. This can be environmental organizations, legal services providers, the faith community, informal community groups, and library staff, among others. Working with effective others will enhance the credibility of the Department of Conservation and Recreation and will let DCR lean heavily on the skill and people they bring to the table.

But DCR should not be let off the hook. This agency among others should invest in in-house outreach and engagement teams. The staff should be well paid and be used across individual agencies to bring the work to the people and people to the work.