|Action||Promulgation of Charitable Gaming Regulations by Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, including electronic gaming provisions|
|Comment Period||Ends 11/23/2022|
I have three questions. First, how was it determined that 40% is the appropriate number? Why not 30 or 50% instead. Why 40%?
Secondly, did you know when you decided on that percentage that the charitable organizations already also give 50% to the gaming company? If you did, then adding 40% was done intentionally to close most of the charitable organizations.
This creates my 3rd question. Who or what organization wants us closed?
If 10% to charity is good enough for the Feds, than 10% should be good enough for the Commonwealth.