Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Department of Education
State Board of Education
Guidance Document Change: The guidance document "Model Policies Concerning Instructional Materials with Sexually Explicit Content" was developed in conjunction with stakeholders in order to comply with SB656 (2022).
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
8/3/22  4:14 pm
Commenter: Adrienne Buskard

Objections to VDOE's Proposal concerning "Sexually Explicit Material"

I have serious concerns about the VDOE’s model policies concerning instructional materials with “sexually explicit content,” a broadly vague term that could be applied to important works of literature like Beloved by Toni Morrison or Ulysses by James Joyce.  Further, this policy is not needed as parents already are able to review their child’s curriculum and serve on advisory boards for their public school system. 


The true intent and impact of Senate Bill 656 is classroom censorship. The term “sexually explicit content” is an extremely broad term that can be used by anyone, based on their personal opinion, to exclude information from a classroom.  This will impact all students in the class, not just the child whose parent objects to the information.  Censorship would deprive students in Virginia of their freedom of thought and expression, which is foundational in a free nation. For students to grow and learn they must be exposed to new ideas and various viewpoints, bettering their understanding of self and the world in which we live. 

If this policy goes into effect, the law could allow a scene or a paragraph from classic media or literary works to be taken out of context and used by some as a reason to label the work "sexually explicit," without considering the full context or the benefits students can receive from the work.  Labeling books as having “sexually explicit content” with no context or understanding of the materials severely limits a teachers' ability to present varied experiences and perspectives. This censorship can deprive Virginia’s students from benefiting from the history of humanity presented through art.

"Sexually explicit content”, as defined in the Virginia code, can include everything from teaching LGBTQ+ history to excluding the discussion of LGBTQ+ families in family life classes. This is absolutely unacceptable and is the same as Florida’s discriminatory bill restricting the mention of homosexuality. 

We all want the best for our children, including the best education. For the most effective education, students must be exposed to different people and cultures to broaden their perspective and better understand their community, country and the world in which they live. More, not less information is needed to encourage critical thinking and to help students develop the skills they need to lead good and meaningful lives, however they personally want to define it as they mature. If we are going to build a tolerant and inclusive society where diversity is embraced and all are included, we cannot censor teachers and librarians from using what is being labeled as “sexually explicit content.”  


Some might ask “shouldn’t parents have a choice in what their children are taught?”  There are already plenty of opportunities for parents in Virginia to know their child’s curriculum and to opt their child out of any lessons they desire.  We do not need a specific additional carve out for “sexually explicit material.”  

CommentID: 124865