We, the People who choose to exercise our God-Given right to self-autonomy, take pen to paper this day to register our unyielding and vehement opposition to the Siren Song of any type of mandated (aka coerced) medical treatment. This unethical and unlawful form of coercion is being leveraged in the form of a petition advanced by a Ms. Kristen M. Calleja within the Commonwealth of Virginia designed to create political action that would require all school-age children to receive an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) experimental mRNA gene therapy as a condition for their continuing attendance and education in a classroom environment.   

The fact that Ms. Calleja could even entertain the idea that any citizen’s right to personal, medical autonomy could be revoked by a simple petition to some government bureaucrat in the Virginia Department of Social Services speaks to a potentially serious defect in her understand of the primary function of a just government. The primary function of any just government is “the protection of INDIVIDUAL” liberties. Ms. Calleja would by-pass the entire legal process of the representative Republic of the Commonwealth of Virginia and cede the power to create a modern, medical Bill of Attainder to the executive branch of that government.  The abdication of personal medical autonomy and the awful power that that action would represent should terrify even the least knowledgeable among us. In the hand of flawed, mortal men with the authority to govern, the very concept of ceding the power to violate personal autonomy whenever the “government” deems it beneficial or necessary, must be eradicated with extreme prejudice NOW!  

The first and fundamental flaw in Ms. Calleja appeal for your acquiescence to this petition lies in the fact that she provides no logical, scientific data-bases evidence to support the need for the administration of these EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies to any child for any reason. (See Note: 1) The second and perhaps more telling flaw in Ms. Calleja appeal for acquiescence is the reliance on fallacious arguments to support and advance her proposal. I have identified numerous logic fallacies in her missive which she obviously believes will advance her cause. But as the most junior member of a high school debating team knows, fallacious arguments are those arguments based on false or invalid inferences. They are the tools of those who do not have the facts to successfully argue their point. Such is the case here.

The first and most obvious fallacious argument found in this petition is also the basis for the entire mandatory “vaccine” controversy and an obvious Non-Sequitur. (‘That does not follow’)

• Ms. Calleja has indicated that the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapy (aka vaccine) is safe and effective.
• Ms. Calleja and her daughter have received this ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapy.
• Therefore, Ms. Calleja surmises (or has been told by government official) that those individuals who have not received the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapy are a danger to those who have received the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapy. What research data has you, Ms. Callja, had access to that provides evidence of such a threat? Could you please provide it Ms. Calleja?
• If the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies currently available are safe and effective, the individuals who have chosen to receive one of the available ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies would have no need to fear the presence of those who have chosen not to partake in these ‘safe and effective’  EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies at this time because the recipients of the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies would be protected from the SARs- CoV-2 virus. Yes?
• So Ms. Calleja and her daughter have received the one of the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies.
• So according to Ms. Calleja’s reasoning, we must receive the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapy to protect her from a pathogen she has already been “inoculated” for because the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies are safe and effective.
•  But if the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies were effective, Ms. Calleja would be in no danger from a non-inoculated person right?
• So if Ms. Calleja and her daughter remain in danger of infection by a non-inoculated person, even after receiving one of the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies, what benefit has she derived from it?
• According to the Director for the Center for Disease Control, Dr. Walensky, “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well, they continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness and death-they prevent it. But what they can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.” (See Note: 2)
• So in the end, those who have received the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies can still catch the disease, spread the disease, get sick from the disease, be hospitalized because of the disease and die from the disease. (multiple sources of data are showing SARs- CoV-2 virus fatalities among the inoculated world-wide) Ms. Callja, what benefit are we supposed to get from these ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies again? The world wonders...

Does everyone here see the convoluted and circular nature of this fallacious argument? From this Non-Sequitur fallacy, Ms. Callja followed with the inevitable ad hominem attack (the irrational minority…), the appeal to emotions/pity fallacy (my poor daughter and other student…), the ad populum fallacy (vaccines are required for other state employees…) and an underlining although indirect appeal to authority fallacy I discerned through the entire body of the petition. Again, fallacious arguments are those arguments placed forward when one has either no facts to bolster their position or the facts stand against their stated positions. Ms. Callja cites no study, no science-based data to buttress her argument. Perhaps she believes that the case has already been made and we who oppose coerced medicine are being merely obstinate or obtuse. This is where we are now.  

From the masks to the social distancing to the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies, where is the science-based data we keep hearing so much about but can never find or see? I have spent voluminous hours reading data from multiple source and continue to be amazed at the lack of science-based data provided by our various government institutions. What is even more telling and suspicious is the unrelenting attempt to censor any contravening scientific data that is not emanating from the Federal Government or threatens the “vaccinate everyone” narrative being imposed unlawfully and unconstitutionally by the Federal Government. This is the exact opposite of the established scientific principles so heavily relied upon to justify the curtailment of so many civil liberties over the past twenty months. A good scientist does not operate by conjecture and that is exactly what the CDC, NIH, NIAID and the FDA have been doing. In attempting to attenuate information from frontline medical and research doctors such as; Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Harvey A. Rische, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr./LTC Theresa Long, US Army, Dr./CDR Jay Furman, US Navy and Dr. Peter McCullough to name a few, the Federal Government has surrendered any claim to any legitimate concern for the well-being of its citizens. A pathogen as “deadly” as SARs- CoV-2 virus would require the immediate exploration of any medical therapy that might help halt its lethal march through our population. This has not happen. Ms. Callja, does the data you are obviously reviewing with such enormous intensity that it seems to empower you to petition government to take over our own personal health choices include data derived from the actual use of the SARs- CoV-2 virus in the testing? We would like to see what you have read on this. Where are the answers to the simple questions about the virus? How big is it? How long does it live outside the human host? How long does it survive in sunlight? Indoors? Is it spread by aerosol or droplet? What is the actual lethal pathology of the virus? (aka how does it kill us?) If it is a cytokine storm that is the lethal component of the pathology of this disease, why are we not concentrating on fighting the effects of an overly stimulated immunological response until it is too late? Why are the incidence of SARs- CoV-2 virus so much less in Scandinavian countries? Africa? South America? Why is the Federal Government ignoring real-time data from front-line Doctors all over the United States and the World (particularly India) in violation of the 2016 21^st Century Care Act? Why are you, Ms. Callja advocating for the violation of 45 CFR Section 46.116, 21 USC 301; CFR 21, Chapter One, Subchapter A, Part 50; Department of Defense Instruction 6200.02; 50 USC 1520a?

These are basic questions that you Ms. Callja, along with the Federal Government seem either unwilling or unable to answer.  This constitutes a huge dilemma for while you cannot answer the aforementioned, basic questions about the disease, you are determined to set the lot of us on a course of “treatment” you cannot even prove is safe or effective. The Federal Government is failing to protect its citizens in accordance with the aforementioned laws. You, Ms. Callja are advocating for the government of the Commonwealth of Virginia to do the same utilizing the same, deficient data. We cannot even trust the data on deaths and injuries from the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies because of the Federal Governments continuing and deliberate failure to abide in the aforementioned laws. A logical person would ask “why” before proceeding any further.

In formulating an argument, one must strive for accuracy in the language one uses. In refusing to call the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies “vaccines,” we are accurately describing the nature of the pharmaceutical agent being administered under the guise of providing individuals with some form of “immunity” to the SARs- CoV-2 virus. But the fact of the matter is that the available ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies do not function as vaccines producing antibodies to a particular pathogen. The ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies alter one’s DNA in an attempt to invoke an immune response. So profound are the differences between the vaccines of the past and the experimental mRNA gene therapies of today that the CDC, in what can only be described as a gross application of Orwellian Newspeak, was compelled to alter the definition of vaccine (which had remained unchanged for over 20 years) to accommodate the outcome caused by the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies.  

A detailed and extensive list of definitions for vaccines is available online. The consistency of the definition over not only a broad spectrum of pathogens, but also a broad number of different medical dictionaries published in these United States does not bolster the case for the CDC’s recent redefining of the term. For the CDC to alter the definition now smacks of expediency and does little to reinforce or restore the Federal Governments eroded credibility on the subject at hand. Ms. Callja offered no information as to how the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies are equivalent to previous vaccines nor shared any insight on how ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies have been proven to be a safe alternative to available medical therapies to combat viral infections. Ms.Callja cannot even provide evidence that the laws governing the development and certification of these ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies have been complied with.

In the end Ms. Callja, may we recommend you stop insulting those of us who have serious questions and concerns about this issue and reason with us. Provide us the facts that have obviously convinced you that acquiring the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies is beneficial and safe for all of us. Provide us with the same human dignity and liberty we afforded you when you decided to take the ‘safe and effective’ EUA experimental mRNA gene therapies. Let us judge the veracity of the data. Until such time as we are convinced of the safety and efficacy of any medical procedures offered to combat any medical condition, we retain our GOD GIVEN right to not be reduced to government sponsored laboratory animals and will defend that right vigorously. Until such time, if ever, we will remain most vehement opposed to the Siren Song of any type of mandated (aka coerced) medical treatment.

In support of the aforementioned contentions, we offer the following references to support my opposition to any form of mandated (aka coerced) medical procedure:

The Constitution of these United States

The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Bill of Rights; Sections1, 11 and 16.

The Nuremburg Principles

The Nuremburg Code (As Codified in to Federal Law via 45 CFR Section 46.116, 21 USC 301; CFR 21, Chapter One, Subchapter A, Part 50; Department Of Defense Instruction 6200.02; 50 USC 1520a.)

The Belmont Report from the Department of Health and Human Services

The Right to Refuse Medical Treatment in the USA. By: Roland B. Standler.

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) (Limits Presidential Executive Orders power.)

The United Nations Declaration of Universal Human Rights.

A Guide to Informed Consent. (Issued by: Office of the Commissioner, Office of Clinical Policy and Programs, Office of Clinical Policy, Office of Good Clinical Practices.)

The History of Informed Consent Requirements in United States Federal Policy: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8852197

The Spartacus Letter. Institute for Coronavirus Emergence Nonprofit Intelligence

Article: Discrete SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer track with functional humoral stability.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21336-8

 Notes:

Note 1: The Comirnaty mRNA gene therapy, “approved” by the FDA is not available nor licensed in the United States for use. There are no FDA approved experimental mRNA gene therapies in the United States at this time.    

Note 2: Wolfe Blitz Interview with CDC Director Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky. Date: 5 August 2021, 7:14 PM EDT.