Has anyone considered that the wording used in the bill could help state employees care for their older relatives who may be in need of affordable quality health care?

Sometimes we lose ourselves in silly homophobic rhetoric and fail to even read what is put before us.

By the way, to all who so righteously proclaim a concern for proper fiscal management, no one has been bold enough to outright suggest the privatization or elimination of any other services they enjoy, so please keep your irrational double standard to yourself.  Thank you.