It seems the thought process still exists that this experimental vax prevents disease. It does not. It offers only the possiblity of lessened symptoms. In fact, those who've received the vax carry the same (or higher) viral load as the unvaccinated and still spread the virus. 

Title VII, Civil Liberties act of 1964 prevents discrimination based on race, color, RELIGION, sex, or national orgin. Not allowing exemptions due to religious beliefs is discrimination and in direct violation of Title VII. 

Per the FDA website, the "approved" vaccine is still covered under EUA. Therefore, enforcement of a vaccine mandate for any age is in direct violation of the Nuremberg Code which emphasizes that people cannot be forced to take experimental drugs without their full consent. Per the FDA website: "Will the emergency use authorization (EUA) for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine remain in effect after the approval?

The EUA will continue to cover adolescents 12 through 15 years of age and the administration of a third dose to certain immunocompromised individuals 12 years of age and older. Additionally, for logistical reasons, the EUA will continue to cover the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID 19 Vaccine in individuals 16 years of age and older; this use is also now approved."  https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/qa-comirnaty-covid-19-vaccine-mrna

Also, the FDA approved vax is manufactured under the name Comirnaty, which is not currently available in the US. So how can someone be forced to take a vax that is not even available here?  https://lc.org/newsroom/details/082721-fda-does-a-bait-and-switch-with-covid-shots