This amendment would definitely benefit the LVT's who have been home or out of the field for a period of time and wanting to transition back to coming in to a clinic.  Also, it would reduce the stress of the current LVT's by increasing numbers so clinics aren't so short on these necessary roles.  Of course, the credentials will still be in place, but make it easier for individuals looking to get back to work.  Allowing this change can only benefit Virginia's veterinary staff overall. 

The points made by the petitioner are valid--we need to recognize that licensed technicians can be exceptional at their work without having performed consistent clinical work for two out of the last four years. Given the impact that the pandemic has had on our workforce, this rule seems excessive and unnecessary. In addition, this rule makes it more difficult for mothers to take time off to be with their children and then return to the workforce without repercussion. 

It makes sense to maintain credential requirements but to allow people to transition in and out of employment depending on the various stages of their careers and lives.  This change is most likely to benefit working mothers and allow a smooth return to the workforce when they are ready and able to do so.

I admire the petitioners request. I am also open to hearing more if she can counter my question.

The question is: The animal sciences are constantly changing. In an order to keep animals safe, the provider should have been regularly engaged in the practice. How do you keep animals safe by removing this requirement?

I think the board should consider decreasing the requirement from 2 years to 6 months of the last 5 years.

I completely agree with statements previously made in support of the changes and do not have anything further to add at the moment.

-Dr. Lerkaram

I completely agree with statements previously made in support of the changes and do not have anything further to add at the moment.