Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Medical Assistance Services
 
Board
Board of Medical Assistance Services
 
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
9/6/24  8:20 pm
Commenter: Anonymous

Persistent and unjust requirement to justify eligibility as paid caregivers
 


Legally Responsible Individuals (LRIs) who provide care for their disabled children under Consumer Directed Services face a persistent and unjust requirement to justify their eligibility as paid caregivers. The proposed amendments, though well-intentioned, introduce unnecessary documentation stipulations that undermine the dignity and contributions of these caregivers.


The requirement to submit an “advertisement” and “interview notes,” along with a job description for a caregiving role that offers no benefits, places an undue burden on LRIs. These stipulations fail to acknowledge the specialized, intensive care provided by family members and introduce barriers that exacerbate an already complex process.


We have taken a firm position against these excessive documentation requirements, emphasizing that such stipulations are not only unnecessary but also unreasonable. We have communicated our objection to the Department of Medical Assistance Services (DMAS), urging them to reconsider this approach, which we believe stems from a condescending attitude toward family caregivers.


By challenging these documentation mandates, we seek to highlight the inefficiencies and burdens imposed on caregivers, and we are fervently advocating for a more respectful and streamlined process. We aim to ensure that LRIs are treated with the dignity they deserve without imposing unnecessary and counterproductive administrative hurdles.

CommentID: 227713