2 comments
Healthcare facilities and providers in Virginia are subject to dueling regulations - one set for state licensure and another for Medicare/ Medicaid certification. Virginia’s regulations in these cases are not just a waste of time on the government side, the administrative burden on healthcare providers is very heavy and entirely unnecessary and the regulations violate both Virginia law and the Governor’s executive order on regulations.
Virginia regulations must be changed to conform to federal Medicare and Medicaid regulations for long-term care facilities to comply with the clear direction of Code of Virginia § 32.1-127. That law requires that Virginia regulations for hospitals and nursing homes “conform” to “health and safety standards established under provisions of Title XVIII (Medicare) and Title XIX (Medicaid) of the Social Security Act.”For example, virtually all of Virginia’s hospitals and hospices and 95% of Virginia’s nursing facilities are certified providers of Medicare or Medicaid or both. It is expensive, counterproductive and in some cases illegal under Virginia law for Virginia to have different regulations for the same facilities, yet we do.
Compliance with that Executive Order that sets out procedures and requirements to ensure the efficiency and quality of Virginia’s regulatory process demands changes in Virginia’s current healthcare regulations.
Code of Federal Regulations Title 42 – Public Health, Chapter IV Subchapter G – Standards and Certification, contain Medicare and Medicaid regulations for every type of healthcare facility and provider. Examplesinclude Parts
42 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 483 – Requirements for States and Long Term Care Facilities regulates Medicare and Medicaid certification pursuant to Title XVIII and Title XIX requirements.12 VAC 5-371, Rules and Regulations for the Licensure of Nursing Facilities contains Virginia licensure regulations for the same facilities.The Virginia licensure regulations not only do not conform to their federal certification counterparts, but are weaker across the board.Ninety-Five percent of Virginia NFs and SNF’s seek certification for Medicare and/or Medicaid and thus must comply with the more stringent federal regulations.There is no reason that Virginia regulations for licensing the other 5% should be different, and by Virginia law they may not be.
July 27, 2020
Erik Bodin
Director, Office of Licensure and Certification
Virginia Department of Health
9960 Mayland Drive, Suite 401
Henrico, Virginia 23233
RE: Public Comment for Periodic Review of 12 VAC 5-410
Dear Mr. Bodin,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Virginia Board of Health periodic review and small business impact review of 12 VAC 5-410, Regulations for the Licensure of Hospitals in Virginia (the “Hospital Licensure Regulations” or “Hospital Licensure Regulations”). As discussed in greater detail below, the Virginia Hospital & Healthcare Association (VHHA) submits that this regulation should be retained and has provided suggestions for how the regulation could be further improved.
The Hospital Licensure Regulations adopted by the Virginia Department of Health establish the baseline from which hospitals must operate their facilities in order to legally operate within the Commonwealth. Promulgated under Va. Code §§ 32.1-12 and 127, the Hospital Licensure Regulations are enacted to ensure “substantial conformity to the standards of health, hygiene, sanitation, construction and safety as established and recognized by medical and health care professionals and by specialists in matters of public health and safety…” Such regulations include: (i) construction and maintenance of hospitals to ensure the environmental protection and the life safety of its patients, employees, and the public; (ii) the operation, staffing and equipping of hospitals; (iii) qualifications and training of staff of hospitals, except those professionals licensed or certified by the Department of Health Professions; (iv) conditions under which a hospital may provide medical and nursing services to patients in their places of residence; and (v) policies related to infection prevention, disaster preparedness, and facility security of hospitals. The Hospital Licensure Regulations are critical to public health, safety, and welfare and for the economic performance of important governmental functions as outlined below.
The Hospital Licensure Regulations are necessary for the economical performance of important governmental functions and to protect the public health and safety in several ways, such as:
In the absence of the Hospital Licensure Regulations to establish the minimum safety standards for hospitals, it is possible services could be offered at generally unsafe facilities, facilities with varying standards of quality that could be detrimental to patient outcomes, or facilities that are ill-equipped to deal with emergency situations.
Today’s hospitals aspire to the highest safety and quality standards in order to continue their work healing all the Virginians. The Hospital Licensure Regulations support these efforts by setting performance standards and expectations for patient care. Patients that enter licensed facilities in Virginia can feel reassured that the facility the patient is entering has been licensed by the Commonwealth of Virginia to adhere to at least a minimum standard of care that is widely accepted by medical professionals. This level of trust in our institutions is essential and is demonstrated, in part, through adhering to the Hospital Licensure Regulations and surpassing them in every manner possible.
However, one area of potential improvement could be streamlining 12 VAC 5 410-443. This section establishes the hospital’s newborn service levels from level 1 to 4 with 4 being the most highly specialized and complex care. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in their Guidelines for Perinatal Care has published criteria for defining similar newborn service levels that differ from what the Commonwealth has adopted. In the interest of maintaining the latest standard of clinical care for infants, we recommend that Office of Licensure and Certification review the latest research and guidelines adopted by the AAP to determine if there could be a public health benefit to conforming to these national standards.
In short, the Hospital Licensure Regulations play an important role in ensuring patient care remains paramount to all stakeholders in the Commonwealth. Maintenance of the existing Hospital Licensure Regulations is essential absent any compelling advancements in safety or quality that warrant statewide compliance due to the standards representing a significant leap in existing practices such as those that may be offered by the AAP Guidelines for Perinatal Care. VHHA and its member hospitals and hospital systems will continue to pursue these new practices and will advocate for their inclusion in future regulations.
The objective of the Hospital Licensure Regulations, as outlined in Section I, have been implemented in the most efficient, cost effective manner by the current set of regulations. Aside from the benefits noted elsewhere in this comment, the Hospital Licensure Regulations are no more broad or narrow than required to fulfill their intended purpose. The regulations have also been promulgated with the continuous input of stakeholders with expertise in the subject matter and requisite credentials to provide informed input on any proposed changes. The Hospital Licensure Regulations have been continuously updated in an efficient manner by the Board of Health and are widely accepted by those in the industry. As a result of the foregoing, the Hospital Licensure Regulations achieve their intended objective in the most efficient, cost effective manner possible.
Generally speaking, the Hospital Licensure Regulations are concise, clearly written and easily understandable. The licensure process is fairly complex and detail-oriented, yet the standards and criteria contained in the Hospital Licensure Regulations are based on objective and well-establish standards of safety and quality that are widely accepted in our Commonwealth and many other parts of the country. The criteria are also current – thanks to routine reviews such as this one.
Nevertheless, we have identified areas of the Hospital Licensure Regulations that could benefit from greater specificity or clarity. Specifically, we would like to provide the following suggestions or observations:
Thank you again for this opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
R. Brent Rawlings
Senior Vice President & General Counsel