Action | Revisions to comply with the “Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004” and its federal implementing regulations. |
Stage | Proposed |
Comment Period | Ended on 6/30/2008 |
Special Education Regulations Revision Process
Office of Dispute Resolution and Administrative Services
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing to submit my comments regarding your office’s proposed revisions to the Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia.
In particular, I recommend the retention of the current definition of “Impartial Hearing Officer” in the
In my view, the VDOE’s proposal to shift control of selected hearing officers from the Virginia Supreme Court to the VDOE is inappropriate and, at a minimum, presents a clear conflict of interest. Total control of the hearing officer process by the VDOE allows for the possibility of “tainted” hearing officers rather than truly impartial hearing officers under the ultimate control of the Virginia Supreme Court. Because there may be times that the VDOE is a party in a due-process dispute or state complaint, it is essential that the hearing officers be completely independent and free of any potential or perceived conflicts of interest, which surely would arise should the proposed revisions be implemented.
Sincerely,
Jackie Simchick