Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Counseling
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Professional Counseling [18 VAC 115 ‑ 20]
Action Requirement for CACREP accreditation for educational programs
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 7/14/2017
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
5/26/17  3:37 pm
Commenter: Martha Kruger, Graduate Student

I Oppose CACREP-Only
 

As a graduate student at George Mason University, I have had the privilege to learn and grow from several incredible educators.  Each has a unique background which further enhances my learning experience and which I ultimately believe will benefit my future clients.  Professional counseling has a set of Professional Standards and Competencies, which are the driving forces in the training accomplished at George Mason University.  The faculty at George Mason fully embody those competencies, whether they were trained initially as psychologists, counselors, or social workers.  Furthermore, they bring the necessary expertise in multicultural and social justice counseling.  Neither of these are key focuses of CACREP, which is a detriment to the diverse population of the Commonwealth.

There is a dearth of empirical evidence demonstrating the value of CACREP.  Universities like George Mason would be hindered from education students to serve the populations most in need of effective counseling that matches their cultures, values, and experiences.  As such, I strongly oppose the CACREP-only accreditation movement. 

CommentID: 59543