Why would it be neccessary to lawfully carry handguns, either concealed with a concealed handgun permit or openly, in a state forest? There is no need considering the only dangers in the woods are certain animals and those carrying handguns. Handguns are not needed for hunting of animals. The employees of the DOF do not carry weapons as there is not a need at this time. I feel that if guns are allowed in state forest by citizens than all employees that enter state forest should be required to carry a handgun to defend themselves if the need arises. Why would there be a need to carry a handgun in the state forest unless you have ill intentions? Have there been so many unpublized attacks in our state forests to require a gun?   As a citizen I feel safe walking in the woods of the park system and state forest land however I would not feel safe if anyone was allowed to carry a firearm.  If I am not mistaken citizen handguns are not allowed in most government building therefore there should not be an exception to allow it on the commonwealth's land.

I feel that I have a RIGHT to enjoy the woods without the fear of walking upon someone carrying a handgun. I have a RIGHT to except my safety be a priority to those in charge of our state and federal land. If I passed someone carrying a rifile I would assume they are hunting however if I passed someone with a handgun I would fear for my safety. I do not agree with the The Virginia Citizens Defense League asking this of the Commonwealth. The purpose of this group isn't for the betterment of our communities but for their selfess need to carry a handgun everywhere. As posted on their website it is proudly stated: "Virginia Citizens Defense League . . . is on a mission to root out every nugget of gun control it can detect in Virginia. It has been behind campaigns to make sure concealed weapons are allowed in local government buildings, even civic centers, and fought to open up state and local parks to concealed weapons."
The Daily Press - Nov 27, 2006

This concept is absurd. The laws are designed to protect the population as a whole and not the need to statisfy a few individual who feel the need to carry a gun everywhere. There is a youtube video stating they are the good guys and here to protect those that can't protect themselves, but how am I suppose to know who the "good guys" are out in the middle of the woods. I would not feel "protected". I am for the right for people to bare arms but not in government buildings, government institutions, government land or in my home. For the record we have guns in our home and if I need to protect myself on my private property then I will do so.  

Please keep your employees and the people who enjoy the outdoors safe by not allowing anyone to carry guns except those that are considered law enforcement.