Looks like everyone making a comment is in agreement.  Put me with that group.  It's hard to believe anyone ever really thought something this broad was a good idea.  Perhaps require a retake of the exam if you are found not in accordance with the Board.  If someone is a repeat offender within a certain time frame then maybe they, and only they, should be required to take an exam every three years.  It seems that this is the bulk of the offenders.  Thanks for the opportunity to chime in.