Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Elections
 
Board
State Board of Elections
 
chapter
Election Administration [1 VAC 20 ‑ 60]
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
4/8/15  5:32 pm
Commenter: Renee B. Andrews

Comments on DRE Study
 

The study seems to be a good beginning, but not a final conclusive one. The two problems verified are susceptibility of the WIN Vote's wireless capability and calibration issues affecting performance of two Accuvote TSX units. These findings point to the need for more study, but certainly not for decertification at this early time. 

As an interim measure, WIN Vote units in polling places with wireless networks should be used as individual units and have their wireless capability disabled. In addition, any other DRE units showing calibration issues severe enough to affect performance (as the two units in Virginia Beach showed) should be removed from service. These measures should still allow for proper administration of the primary elections in June. 

For the longer term, more study clearly is needed. The report concluded that all localities in question should "begin planning for the replacement of these systems." It is my understanding that all localities in Virginia are either in the process of replacing DREs or are planning for such replacement. It is unfortunate that the Governor's recommendation for state funding to offset the cost of new equipment was not enacted. Local governing bodies need to be made aware of the critical need for funding of equipment, and ELECT needs the proper funding to conduct the necessary studies and to support the localities in their acquisition and implementation of new equipment. 

I regret that I am unable to attend the meeting in person and appreciate having the opportunity to submit this written comment. 

CommentID: 39869