Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of General Services
 
Board
Department of General Services
 
chapter
Regulations Banning Concealed Firearms in Offices Occupied by Executive Branch Agencies [1 VAC 30 ‑ 105]
Action Promulgation of new regulation banning concealed firearms in executive branch agency offices
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 10/21/2016
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
9/8/16  2:02 pm
Commenter: Arturo de Hoyos

"Gun bans" deny citizens self-protetion, while they are taxed to protect elected officials
 

Disarming lawful individuals with a CHP not only places them at risk, but it creates and reinforces an "entitled" class of people (elected officials and lawmakers) who themselves benefit from armed protection paid for by the very citizens whose rights to self-protection are abrogated and/or denied.

There is no evidence that lawful concealed carriers are a threat. Studies have shown that citizens with a CHP are far less likely to commit *any* crime than those without. Gun-bans are merely a "feel good" tactic which does not benefit society. This is proved by noting that the most violent cities have the strongest gun regulations.

CommentID: 54063