Virginia Regulatory Town Hall Show XML

Final Text

highlight

Action:

Amend Existing WQMP Regulation - nutrient allocations

Stage: Final

9VAC25-720-50 Potomac-Shenandoah River Basin

A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).

TMDL #	Stream Name	TMDL Title	City/County	WBID	Pollutant	WLA¹	Units
1.	Muddy Creek, Dry River, and tributaries to North River	Nitrate TMDL Development for Muddy Creek/Dry River, Virginia	Rockingham	B21R, B22R	Nitrate	49,389.00	LB/YR
2.	Blacks Run	Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County	Rockingham, City of Harrisonburg	B26R	Sediment	1,310,000	LB/YR
3.	Cooks Creek	Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County	Rockingham	B25R	Sediment	1,543,000	LB/YR
4.	Cooks Creek	Revision of the Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Developed for the Blacks Run and Cooks Creek Watershed Located in the City of Harrisonburg and Rockingham County	Rockingham	B25R	Phosphorus	2,060	LB/YR
5.	Muddy Creek	TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia	Rockingham	B22R	Sediment	286,939.00	LB/YR
6.	Muddy Creek	TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia	Rockingham	B22R	Phosphorus	38.00	LB/YR
7.	Holmans Creek	TMDL Development for Muddy Creek and Holmans Creek, Virginia	Rockingham, Shenandoah	B45R	Sediment	78,141.00	LB/YR
8.	Mill Creek	TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B29R	Sediment	276.00	LB/YR
9.	Mill Creek	TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B29R	Phosphorus	116.00	LB/YR
10.	Pleasant Run	TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B27R	Sediment	0.00	LB/YR
11.	Pleasant Run	TMDL Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B27R	Phosphorus	0.00	LB/YR
12.	Linville Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and Benthic Impairments	Rockingham	B46R	Sediment	5.50	TONS/YR
13.	Quail Run	Benthic TMDL for Quail Run	Rockingham	B35R	Ammonia	7,185.00	KG/YR
14.	Quail Run	Benthic TMDL for Quail Run	Rockingham	B35R	Chlorine	27.63	KG/YR
15.	Shenandoah River	Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (South Fork and Main Stem)	Warren, Clarke	B41R B55R B57R B58R	PCBs	179.38	G/YR
16.	Shenandoah River	Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (North Fork)	Warren, Clarke	B51R	PCBs	0.00	G/YR
17.	Shenandoah River	Development of Shenandoah River PCB TMDL (Main Stem)	Warren, Clarke	WV	PCBs	179.38	G/YR
18.	Cockran Spring	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Augusta	B10R	Organic solids	1,556.00	LB/YR
19.	Lacey Spring	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Rockingham	B47R	Organic solids	680.00	LB/YR
20.	Orndorff Spring	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Shenandoah	B52R	Organic solids	103.00	LB/YR
21.	Toms Brook	Benthic TMDL for Toms Brook in Shenandoah County, Virginia	Shenandoah	B50R	Sediment	8.1	T/YR
22.	Goose Creek	Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun, Fauquier	A08R	Sediment	1,587	T/YR
23.	Little River	Benthic TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun	A08R	Sediment	105	T/YR
24.	Christians Creek	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA	Augusta	B14R	Sediment	145	T/YR
25.	Moffett Creek	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA	Augusta	B13R	Sediment	0	T/YR
26.	Upper Middle River	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds, Augusta County, VA	Augusta	B10R	Sediment	1.355	T/YR
27.	Mossy Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments	Rockingham	B19R	Sediment	0.04	T/YR
28.	Smith Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Smith Creek	Rockingham, Shenandoah	B47R	Sediment	353,867	LB/YR
29.	Abrams Creek	Opequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia	Frederick	B09R	Sediment	478	T/YR
30.	Lower Opequon Creek	Opequon Watershed TMDLs for Benthic Impairments: Abrams Creek and Lower Opequon Creek, Frederick and Clarke counties, Virginia	Frederick, Clarke	B09R	Sediment	1,039	T/YR
31.	Mill Creek	Mill Creek Sediment TMDL for a Benthic Impairment, Shenandoah County, Virginia	Shenandoah	B48R	Sediment	0.9	T/YR
32.	South Run	Benthic TMDL Development for South Run, Virginia	Fauquier	A19R	Phosphorus	0.038	T/YR
33.	Lewis Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)	Augusta	B12R	Sediment	40	T/YR
34.	Lewis Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)	Augusta	B12R	Lead	0	KG/YR
35.	Lewis Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)	Augusta	B12R	PAHs	0	KG/YR
36.	Bull Run	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)	Loudoun, Fairfax, and Prince William Counties, and the Cities of Manassas and Manassas Park	A23R-01	Sediment	5,986.8	T/TR
37.	Popes Head Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, General Standard (Benthic)	Fairfax County and Fairfax City	A23R-02	Sediment	1,594.2	T/YR
38.	Accotink Bay	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A15R	PCBs	0.0992	G/YR
39.	Aquia Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Stafford	A28E	PCBs	6.34	G/YR
40.	Belmont Bay/ Occoquan Bay	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A25E	PCBs	0.409	G/YR
41.	Chopawamsic Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A26E	PCBs	1.35	G/YR
42.	Coan River	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Northumberland	A34E	PCBs	0	G/YR
43.	Dogue Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A14E	PCBs	20.2	G/YR
44.	Fourmile Run	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Arlington	A12E	PCBs	11	G/YR
45.	Gunston Cove	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A15E	PCBs	0.517	G/YR
46.	Hooff Run & Hunting Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A13E	PCBs	36.8	G/YR
47.	Little Hunting Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A14E	PCBs	10.1	G/YR
48.	Monroe Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A31E	PCBs	.0177	G/YR
49.	Neabsco Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A25E	PCBs	6.63	G/YR
50.	Occoquan River	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A25E	PCBs	2.86	G/YR
51.	Pohick Creek/Pohick Bay	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Fairfax	A16E	PCBs	13.5	G/YR
52.	Potomac Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Stafford	A29E	PCBs	0.556	G/YR
53.	Potomac River, Fairview Beach	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	King George	A29E	PCBs	0.0183	G/YR
54.	Powells Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A26R	PCBs	0.0675	G/YR
55.	Quantico Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	Prince William	A26R	PCBs	0.742	G/YR
56.	Upper Machodoc Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development in the tidal Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tidal tributaries	King George	A30E	PCBs	0.0883	G/YR
57.	Difficult Creek	Benthic TMDL Development for Difficult Run, Virginia	Fairfax	A11R	Sediment	3,663.2	T/YR
58.	(Reserved)
59.	(Reserved)
60.	South River	Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River	Augusta and Rockingham	B32R	Sediment	619.4	T/YR
61.	South River	Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River	Augusta and Rockingham	B32R	Phosphorus	6,929.9	KG/YR
62.	South River	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia	Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren	B32R	Mercury	112	G/YR
63.	South Fork Shenandoah River	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia	Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren	B32R, B33R	Mercury	112	G/YR
64.	Shenandoah River	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mercury in the South River, South Fork Shenandoah River, and Shenandoah River, Virginia	Augusta, Rockingham, Page, and Warren	B32R, B33R	Mercury	112	G/YR
65.	Spout Run	Total Maximum Daily Load Development to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed, Clarke County, Virginia	Clarke	B57R	Sediment	7.44	T/YR
66.	West Strait Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek	Highland	B02R	Sediment	0.02	T/D
67.	West Strait Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek	Highland	B02R	CBOD₅	11	KG/D
68.	West Strait Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek	Highland	B02R	Dry season (June – December) ammonia as N	1.6	KG/D
69.	West Strait Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek	Highland	B02R	Wet season (January – May) ammonia as N	2.9	KG/D
70.	Strait Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Strait Creek and West Strait Creek	Highland	B02R	Sediment	0.08	T/D
71.	Accotink Creek, lower	Bacteria TMDL for the Lower Accotink Creek Watershed	Fairfax	A15	E. coli	1.76E+12	cfu/year
72.	Accotink Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL for Accotink Creek	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Fecal coliform	1.30E+14	cfu/year
73.	Beaver Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Beaver Creek	Rockingham	B18	E. coli	1.22E+10	cfu/year
74.	Blacks Run	Fecal Coliform TMDL for Blacks Run	Harrisonburg	B26	Fecal coliform	5.52E+09	cfu/year
75.	North Fork Catoctin Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments	Loudoun	A02	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
76.	Lower South Fork Catoctin Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments	Loudoun	A02	Fecal coliform	1.60E+11	cfu/year
77.	Upper South Fork Catoctin Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments	Loudoun	A02	Fecal coliform	4.42E+11	cfu/year
78.	Catoctin Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Catoctin Creek Impairments	Loudoun	A02	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
79.	Licking Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run	Fauquier	A17	E. coli	2.61E+09	cfu/year
80.	Cedar Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Cedar Run and Licking Run	Prince William, Fauquier	A17, A18	E. coli	5.58E+11	cfu/year
81.	Christians Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL for Christians Creek	Augusta	B14	Fecal coliform	1.18E+13	cfu/year
82.	Coan River (145G)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
83.	Coan River, Headly Cove (145H)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
84.	Coan River, Killneck Creek (145E)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
85.	Coan River, Stevens Point (145F)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
86.	Mill Creek and the Coan River (145I)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
87.	The Glebe (145D)	Coan River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Six Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
88.	Bridgeman Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	7.70E+08	MPN/day
89.	Cod Creek, east	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	9.06E+08	MPN/day
90.	Rogers Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	9.83E+08	MPN/day
91.	Cod Creek, west	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	1.53E+09	MPN/day
92.	Presley Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	3.63E+09	MPN/day
93.	Hack Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	3.00E+09	MPN/day
94.	Cubitt Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	4.25E+09	MPN/day
95.	Hull Creek	Cod, Presley, Bridgeman, Hull, Rogers, Cubitt, and Hack Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Northumberland	A34	Fecal coliform	1.27E+10	MPN/day
96.	Cooks Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Cooks Creek	Rockingham, Harrisonburg	B25, B26	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
97.	Cub Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for Cub Run	Rockingham	B34	E. coli	1.74E+10	cfu/year
98.	Difficult Run	Bacteria TMDL for the Difficult Run Watershed	Fairfax	A11	E. coli	9.86E+12	cfu/year
99.	Dry River	Fecal Coliform TMDL for Dry River	Rockingham	B20, B21, B22	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
100.	Four Mile Run	Fecal Coliform TMDL (Total Maximum Daily Load) Development for Four Mile Run	Arlington, Alexandria	A12	Fecal coliform	2.04E+13	cfu/year
101.	Jackson Creek	Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Westmoreland	A33	Fecal coliform	1.44E+09	MPN/day
102.	Gardner Creek	Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Westmoreland	A33	Fecal coliform	1.96E+09	MPN/day
103.	Bonum Creek	Gardner, Jackson, and Bonum Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Westmoreland	A33	Fecal coliform	2.96E+09	MPN/day
104.	Little River	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Fauquier	A08	Fecal coliform	1.38E+10	cfu/year
105.	South Fork Sycolin Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun	A08	Fecal coliform	1.41E+10	cfu/year
106.	Sycolin Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun	A08	Fecal coliform	2.79E+10	cfu/year
107.	Cromwells Run	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Fauquier	A05	Fecal coliform	9.80E+10	cfu/year
108.	Beaverdam Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun	A07	Fecal coliform	1.21E+12	cfu/year
109.	North Fork Goose Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun	A06	Fecal coliform	3.11E+13	cfu/year
110.	Goose Creek and tributaries	Bacteria TMDLs for the Goose Creek Watershed	Loudoun, Fauquier	A04, A05, A06, A07, A08	Fecal coliform	3.88E+13	cfu/year
111.	Hawksbill Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hawksbill Creek	Page	B39	E. coli	3.13E+12	cfu/year
112.	Hogue Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment in Hogue Creek	Frederick	B06	E. coli	6.58E+11	cfu/year
113.	Holmans Creek	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Holmans Creek	Shenandoah	B45	Fecal coliform	3.20E+10	cfu/year
114.	Holmes Run	Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds	Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church	A13	E. coli	8.38E+13	cfu/year
115.	Cameron Run	Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds	Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church	A13	E. coli	1.33E+14	cfu/year
116.	Hunting Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for the Hunting Creek, Cameron Run, and Holmes Run Watersheds	Fairfax, Alexandria, Falls Church	A13	E. coli	3.24E+14	cfu/year
117.	Limestone Branch	Bacteria TMDL for Limestone Branch	Loudoun	A03	E. coli	5.83E+11	cfu/year
118.	Linville Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Linville Creek: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments	Rockingham	B46	E. coli	1.10E+11	cfu/year
119.	Bridge Creek (10-9X)	Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	E. coli	0	cfu/year
120.	Little Wicomico River (10-19)	Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	E. coli	0	cfu/year
121.	Little Wicomico River (10-20)	Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	E. coli	0	cfu/year
122.	Little Wicomico River, Cod Creek (10-13.5Z)	Little Wicomico River Watershed TMDL for Three Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Northumberland	A34	E. coli	0	cfu/year
123.	Branson Cove	Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	4.11E+08	MPN/day
124.	Cabin Point Creek	Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	1.93E+09	MPN/day
125.	Glebe and Ames Creeks	Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	2.13E+09	MPN/day
126.	Lower Machodoc Creek	Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	9.67E+09	MPN/day
127.	Weatherall Creek	Lower Machodoc Creek Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	9.95E+08	MPN/day
128.	Mattox Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek	Westmoreland, King George	A31	E. coli	2.20E+06	cfu/year
129.	Mattox Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek	Westmoreland, King George	A31	Enterococci	1.26E+10	cfu/year
130.	Mattox Creek tidal (shellfish)	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mattox Creek	Westmoreland, King George	A31	Fecal coliform	5.03E+09	cfu/year
131.	Moffett Creek	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Augusta	B13	E. coli	0	cfu/year
132.	Polecat Draft	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Augusta	B15	E. coli	0	cfu/year
133.	Lewis Creek	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Staunton	B12	E. coli	3.48E+09	cfu/year
134.	Upper Middle River	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Augusta	B10, B11	E. coli	8.53E+09	cfu/year
135.	Upper South River	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Augusta	B30	E. coli	1.06E+11	cfu/year
136.	Lower Middle River watershed	Fecal Bacteria and General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Impaired Streams in the Middle River and Upper South River Watersheds	Augusta, Staunton	B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15	E. coli	1.24E+13	cfu/year
137.	Mill Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development Mill Creek Bacteria (E. coli) Impairment	Page	B38	E. coli	0	cfu/year
138.	Mill Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for Mill Creek and Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B29	Total phosphorus	116	lbs/year
139.	Mill Creek and tributaries	Fecal coliform TMDL for Mill Creek Watershed	Rockingham	B29	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
140.	Mill Creek including unnamed tributary to Kissinger Millpond and Kissinger Millpond	Bacteria TMDL for (nontidal) Mill Creek including Un-named Tributary to Kissinger Millpond, and Kissinger Millpond	Northumberland	A33	E. coli	5.91E+10	cfu/year
141.	Monroe Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Monroe Bay: Monroe Creek	Westmoreland	A31	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
142.	Mossy Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments	Augusta	B19	E. coli	1.74E+09	cfu/year
143.	Long Glade Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mossy Creek and Long Glade Run: Bacteria and General Standard (Benthic) Impairments	Augusta	B24	E. coli	5.23E+09	cfu/year
144.	Muddy Creek	Fecal coliform TMDL for Muddy Creek	Rockingham	B22	Fecal coliform	3.04E+11	cfu/year
145.	Naked Creek	Fecal coliform TMDL for Naked Creek	Augusta	B28	Fecal coliform	5.54E+09	cfu/year
146.	Neabsco Creek	Bacteria TMDL for Neabsco Creek	Prince William	A25	E. coli	1.27E+12	cfu/day
147.	Barnes Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
148.	Buckner Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
149.	Cold Harbor Bay	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
150.	Currioman Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
151.	Nomini Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
152.	North Prong Buckner Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
153.	Pierce Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Nomini Creek	Westmoreland	A32	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
154.	Mill Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River	Shenandoah	B48	E. coli	8.80E+09	cfu/year
155.	Stony Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River	Shenandoah	B49	E. coli	4.42E+12	cfu/year
156.	North Fork Shenandoah River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek, Stony Creek, and the North Fork of the Shenandoah River	Frederick, Rockingham, Shenandoah	B42, B43, B44, B45, B46, B47, B48, B49, B50, B51, B52, B53, B54	E. coli	1.02E+13	cfu/year
157.	North River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North River	Augusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg	B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29	E. coli	5.32E+13	cfu/year
158.	Broad Run (3) (VAN-A19R-05)	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Prince William, Fauquier	A19	E. coli	2.35E+10	cfu/year
159.	Little Bull Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Prince William	A21	E. coli	3.29E+10	cfu/year
160.	Broad Run (2) (VAN-A19R-02)	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Fauquier	A19	E. coli	1.36E+11	cfu/year
161.	Occoquan River	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Manassas, Fauquier, Prince William	A17, A18, A19, A20	E. coli	2.29E+11	cfu/year
162.	South Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Fauquier	A19	E. coli	4.32E+11	cfu/year
163.	Broad Run (1) (VAN-A19R-01)	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Fauquier	A19	E. coli	5.84E+11	cfu/year
164.	Popes Head Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Fairfax	A23	E. coli	7.12E+11	cfu/year
165.	Kettle Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Prince William	A19	E. coli	8.30E+12	cfu/year
166.	Bull Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Popes Head Creek, Broad Run, Kettle Run, South Run, Little Bull Run, Bull Run and Occoquan River	Manassas Park, Prince William, Fairfax, Loudoun	A21, A22, A23	E. coli	1.11E+14	cfu/year
167.	Abrams Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek	Frederick, Winchester	B09	E. coli	3.10E+12	cfu/year
168.	Upper Opequon Creek watershed	Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek	Frederick	B08	E. coli	1.13E+13	cfu/year
169.	Lower Opequon Creek watershed and tributaries	Bacteria TMDLs for Abrams Creek and Upper and Lower Opequon Creek	Frederick, Clarke, Winchester	B08, B09	E. coli	2.13E+13	cfu/year
170.	Piney Run	Bacteria TMDL for Piney Run	Loudoun	A01	E. coli	3.48E+09	cfu/year
171.	Pleasant Run	Fecal coliform TMDL for Pleasant Run	Rockingham	B27	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
172.	Popes Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Potomac River: Mattox Creek to Currioman Bay	Westmoreland	A31	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
173.	Potomac Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Stafford	A29	E. coli	1.77E+11	cfu/year
174.	Potomac River, unnamed tributary	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Stafford	A26	E. coli	3.92E+11	cfu/year
175.	Chopawamsic Creek, North Branch	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Prince William	A26	E. coli	4.01E+11	cfu/year
176.	Potomac Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Stafford	A29	E. coli	7.35E+11	cfu/year
177.	Quantico Creek, South Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Prince William	A26	E. coli	1.09E+12	cfu/year
178.	Accokeek Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Stafford	A29	E. coli	3.18E+12	cfu/year
179.	Powells Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Prince William	A26	E. coli	3.18E+12	cfu/year
180.	Quantico Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Prince William	A26	E. coli	3.75E+12	cfu/year
181.	Austin Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Prince William and Stafford Counties	Stafford	A28	E. coli	3.14E+13	cfu/year
182.	Rosier Creek	Bacteria TMDL for Rosier Creek Watershed	King George	A31	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
183.	Smith Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Smith Creek	Shenandoah, Rockingham	B47	E. coli	8.53E+11	cfu/year
184.	South Fork Shenandoah River	Bacteria TMDL Development and Benthic Stressor Analysis for South Fork Shenandoah River	Augusta, Staunton, Rockingham, Harrisonburg, Page, Warren, Waynesboro	B10, B11, B12, B13, B14, B15, B16, B17, B18, B19, B20, B21, B22, B23, B24, B25, B26, B27, B28, B29, B30, B31, B32, B33, B34, B35, B36, B37, B38, B39, B40, B41	E. coli	1.43E+14	cfu/year
185.	South River	Bacteria and Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load Development for South River	Augusta, Waynesboro	B30, B31, B32	E. coli	1.13E+14	cfu/year
186.	Page Brook	Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed	Clarke	B57	E. coli	2.18E+11	cfu/year
187.	Roseville Run	Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed	Clarke	B57	E. coli	3.05E+11	cfu/year
188.	Spout Run	Total Maximum Daily Load Developments to Address Bacteria and Benthic Impairments in the Spout Run Watershed	Clarke	B57	E. coli	5.22E+11	cfu/year
189.	Mine Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run	Fairfax	A11	E. coli	1.22E+11	cfu/year
190.	Pimmit Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run	Arlington, Fairfax	A12	E. coli	1.17E+12	cfu/year
191.	Sugarland Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Tributaries to the Potomac River: Sugarland Run, Mine Run, and Pimmit Run	Fairfax	A10	E. coli	4.78E+12	cfu/year
192.	Tidal Four Mile Run	Bacteria TMDL for the Tidal Four Mile Run	Arlington, Alexandria	A12	E. coli	1.42E+14	cfu/year
193.	Deep Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek	King George	A30	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
194.	Upper Machodoc Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek	King George	A30	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
195.	Williams Creek, Upper Machodoc Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Upper Machodoc Creek	King George	A30	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
196.	Dungan Cove	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River	Northumberland	A33	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
197.	Hampton Hall Branch	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River	Westmoreland	A33	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
198.	Lodge Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River	Northumberland	A33	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
199.	Mill Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River	Northumberland	A33	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
200.	White Point Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Yeocomico River	Westmoreland	A33	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
201.	Crooked Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Frederick, Warren	B56R	E. coli	2.22E+12	cfu/year
202.	Borden Marsh Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Clarke, Warren	B55R	E.coli	2.81E+11	cfu/year
203.	Willow Brook	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Warren	B55R	E. coli	2.33E+11	cfu/year
204.	West Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Frederick, Warren	B56R	E. coli	5.80E+11	cfu/year
205.	Long Branch	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Clarke	B57R	E. coli	1.73E+11	cfu/year
206.	Stephens Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Frederick	B56R	E. coli	3.07E+11	cfu/year
207.	Manassas Run	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Warren	B55R	E. coli	3.24E+11	cfu/year
208.	Happy Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Warren	B41R	E. coli	4.27E+11	cfu/year
209.	Happy Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Crooked Run, Borden Marsh Run, Willow Brook, West Run, Long Branch, Stephens Run, Manassas Run, and Happy Creek Watersheds, and Sediment TMDL Development for Happy Creek Watershed	Warren	B41R	Sediment	29.05	tons/year
210.	Turley Creek	TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)	Rockingham	B45	Sediment	19.87	tons/year
211.	Long Meadow Run	TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)	Rockingham	B45	Sediment	27.92	tons/year
212.	Long Meadow Run	TMDLs for Turley Creek (sediment) and Long Meadow Run (sediment and nitrogen)	Rockingham	B45	Nitrogen	520.6	lbs/year
213.	Upper Accotink Creek	Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Sediment	2,338	tons/year
214.	Lower Accotink Creek	Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Sediment	3,073	tons/year
215.	Long Branch (central)	Sediment TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Sediment	936	tons/year
216.	Upper Accotink Creek	Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Chloride	5,444,279	lbs/year
217.	Lower Accotink Creek	Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Chloride	3,723,479	lbs/year
218.	Long Branch (central)	Chloride TMDLs for the Accotink Creek Watershed, Fairfax County, Virginia	Fairfax, Fairfax City	A15	Chloride	873,049	lbs/year
219.	North Fork Catoctin Creek	A TMDL and Watershed Management Plan to Address Sediment in North Fork Catoctin Creek Located in Loudoun County, Virginia	Loudoun	A02R	Sediment	99.1	tons/year
220.	Lewis Creek	PCB Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Lewis Creek, Staunton, Virginia	Staunton	B12R	PCBs	3,040	mg/yr
Notes: ¹The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that DEQ tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria. ²There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area.

B. Non-TMDL wasteload allocations.

Water Body	Permit No.	Facility Name	Outfall No.	Receiving Stream	River Mile	Parameter Description	WLA	Units WLA
VAV-B02R	VA0023281	Monterey STP	001	West Strait Creek	3.85	CBOD₅	11.4	KG/D
VAV-B08R	VA0065552	Opequon Water Reclamation Facility	001	Opequon Creek	32.66	BOD₅, JUN-NOV	207	KG/D
		AKA Winchester - Frederick Regional				CBOD₅, DEC-MAY	1514	KG/D
VAV-B14R	VA0025291	Fishersville Regional STP	001	Christians Creek	12.36	BOD₅	182	KG/D
VAV-B23R	VA0060640	North River WWTF AKA Harrisonburg - Rockingham Reg. Sewer Auth.	001	North River	15.01	CBOD₅, JAN-MAY	700	KG/D
						CBOD₅, JUN-DEC	800
						TKN, JUN-DEC	420
						TKN, JAN-MAY	850
VAV-B32R	VA0002160	INVISTA - Waynesboro Formerly Dupont - Waynesboro	001	South River	25.3	BOD₅	272	KG/D
VAV-B32R	VA0025151	Waynesboro STP	001	South River	23.54	CBOD₅	227	KG/D
VAV-B32R	VA0025151	Waynesboro STP	001	South River	23.54	CBOD₅, JUN-OCT	113.6	KG/D
VAV-B32R	VA0028037	Skyline Swannanoa STP	001	South River UT	2.96	BOD₅	8.5	KG/D
VAV-B35R	VA0024732	Massanutten Public Service STP	001	Quail Run	5.07	BOD₅	75.7	KG/D
VAV-B37R	VA0002178	Merck & Company	001	S.F. Shenandoah River	88.09	BOD₅	1570	KG/D
VAV-B37R	VA0002178	Merck & Company	001	S.F. Shenandoah River	88.09	AMMONIA, AS N	645.9	KG/D
VAV-B49R	VA0028380	Stoney Creek Sanitary District STP	001	Stoney Creek	19.87	BOD₅, JUN-NOV	29.5	KG/D
VAV-B53R	VA0020982	Middletown STP	001	Meadow Brook	2.19	CBOD₅	24.0	KG/D
VAV-B58R	VA0020532	Berryville STP	001	Shenandoah River	24.23	CBOD₅	42.6	KG/D

C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers. The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.

Virginia Waterbody ID	Discharger Name	VPDES Permit No.	Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)	Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)
B37R	~~Coors Brewing Company~~ Molson Coors - Shenandoah Brewery	VA0073245	54,820	4,112
B14R	ACSA - Fishersville Regional ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0025291	48,729	3,655
B32R	~~INVISTA - Waynesboro~~ The Lycra Company (Outfall 101)	VA0002160	78,941	1,009
B39R	Luray ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0062642	19,492	1,462
B35R	Massanutten ~~PSA~~ Public Service Corporation STP	VA0024732	18,273	1,371
B37R	Merck ~~- Stonewall WWTP~~ Sharp & Dohme Corp. - Elkton Plant (Outfall 101)¹	VA0002178	43,835	4,384
B12R	ACSA - Middle River Regional ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0064793	82,839 ^[¹^]	6,213 ^[²^]
B23R	North River WWTF^[³ ¹^]	VA0060640	~~253,391~~ 260,226^[¹^]	~~19,004~~ 19,574^{[ 2 ]}
B22R	~~VA Poultry Growers~~ VPGC, LLC - Hinton	VA0002313	27,410	1,371
B38R	~~Pilgrims Pride - Alma~~ Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly VA0001961	18,273	914
B31R	ACSA - Stuarts Draft WWTP	VA0066877	48,729	3,655
B32R	Waynesboro ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0025151	48,729 ^[¹^]	3,655 ^[²^]
B23R	ACSA - Weyers Cave ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0022349	6,091	457
B58R	Berryville ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0020532	8,528	640
B55R	Front Royal ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0062812	48,729 ^[¹^]	3,655 ^[²^]
B49R	Georges Chicken LLC	VA0077402	31,065	1,553
B48R	Mt. Jackson STP	VA0026441	8,528	640
B45R	Broadway Regional WWTF	VA0090263	29,481	2,211
B49R	Stoney Creek SD STP	VA0028380	7,309	548
B51R	Strasburg STP	VA0020311	11,939	895
B50R	Woodstock STP	VA0026468	24,364	1,827
A06R	Basham Simms WWTF	VA0022802	18,273	1,371
A09R	Broad Run WRF	VA0091383	134,005 ^[¹^]	3,350 ^[²^]
A08R	Leesburg WPCF	VA0092282	121,822 ^[¹^]	9,137 ^[²^]
A06R	Round Hill Town ~~WWTF~~ WWTP	VA0026212	9,137	685
A25R	~~DSC~~ VA American Water Prince William - Section 1 WWTF	VA0024724	42,029 ^[¹^]	2,522 ^[²^]
A25R	~~DSC~~ VA American Water Prince William - Section 8 WWTF	VA0024678	42,029 ^[¹^]	2,522 ^[²^]
A25E	H L Mooney WWTF	VA0025101	219,280 ^[¹^]	13,157 ^[²^]
A22R	UOSA - Centreville	VA0024988	1,315,682	16,446
A19R	Vint Hill ~~WWTF~~ WWTP	VA0020460	11,573	868
B08R	Opequon WRF²^[⁴ ² ^]	VA0065552	121,851 ^[¹^]	11,512 ^[²^]
B08R	Parkins ~~Mills STP~~ Mill WWTF	VA0075191	60,911 ^[¹^]	4,568 ^[²^]
A13E	Alexandria Renew Enterprises³ WWTP^[⁵ ³^]	VA0025160	493,381 ^[¹^]	29,603 ^[²^]
A12E	Arlington County Water PCF	VA0025143	365,467 ^[¹^]	21,928 ^[²^]
A16R	Noman M Cole Jr ~~PCF~~ PCP	VA0025364	612,158 ^[¹^]	36,729 ^[²^]
A12R	Blue Plains (VA Share)	DC0021199	581,458	26,166
A26R	USMC Quantico ~~WWTF~~ Mainside STP	VA0028363	20,101	1,206
A28R	Aquia ~~WWTF~~ WWTP	VA0060968	73,093 ^[¹^]	4,386 ^[²^]
A31E	Colonial Beach ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0026409	18,273	1,827
A30E	KGCSA - Dahlgren ~~WWTF~~ District WWTP	VA0026514	9,137	914
A29E	~~King George County Service Authority~~ KGCSA - Fairview Beach WWTP	VA0092134	1,827	183
A30E	~~US NSWC-Dahlgren WWTF~~ Naval Support Facility Dahlgren	VA0021067	6,578	658
A31R	KGCSA - Purkins Corner ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0070106	1,096	110
	~~Unallocated Reserve WLA~~ Nutrient Offset Fund		9,137	685
	TOTALS:		~~5,156,169~~ 5,214,628	~~246,635~~ 254,334
Notes: ¹Merck-Stonewall – (a) these wasteload allocations will be subject to further consideration, consistent with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL, as it may be amended, and possible reduction upon "full-scale" results showing the optimal treatment capability of the 4-stage Bardenpho technology at this facility consistent with the level of effort by other dischargers in the region. The "full scale" evaluation will be completed by December 31, 2011, and the results submitted to DEQ for review and subsequent board action; (b) in any year when credits are available after all other exchanges within the Shenandoah-Potomac River Basin are completed in accordance with § 62.1-44.19:18 of the Code of Virginia, Merck shall acquire credits for total nitrogen discharged in excess of 14,619 lbs/yr and total phosphorus discharged in excess of 1,096 lbs/yr; and (c) the allocations are not transferable and compliance credits are only generated if discharged loads are less than the loads identified in clause (b). [ ¹Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ²Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ] ^[ ³ ¹ ^] North River WWTF WLA includes 6,835 lbs/yr of TN and 570 lbs/yr of TP from the consolidation of the McGaheysville STP (VA0072931). ^{2 [}⁴ ^{2 ]}Opequan WRF: (a) the TN WLA is derived based on 3 mg/l of TN and 12.6 MGD; (b) the TN WLA includes an additional allocation for TN in the amount of 6,729 lbs/yr by means of a landfill leachate consolidation and treatment project; and (c) the TP WLA is derived based on 0.3 mg/l of TP and 12.6 MGD. ³ ^[ ⁵ ³^]Wasteload allocations for localities served by combined sewers are based on dry weather design flow capacity. During wet weather flow events the discharge shall achieve a TN concentration of 4.0 mg/l and TP concentration of 0.18 mg/l.

9VAC25-720-60 James River Basin

A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).

TMDL #	Stream Name	TMDL Title	City/County	WBID	Pollutant	WLA¹	Units
1.	Pheasanty Run	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Bath	I14R	Organic solids	1,231.00	LB/YR
2.	Wallace Mill Stream	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Augusta	I32R	Organic solids	2,814.00	LB/YR
3.	Montebello Sp. Branch	Benthic TMDL Reports for Six Impaired Stream Segments in the Potomac-Shenandoah and James River Basins	Nelson	H09R	Organic solids	37.00	LB/YR
4.	Unnamed tributary to Deep Creek	General Standard Total Maximum Daily Load for Unnamed Tributary to Deep Creek	Nottoway	J11R	Raw sewage	0	GAL/YR
5.	Unnamed tributary to Chickahominy River	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Unnamed Tributary to the Chickahominy River	Hanover	G05R	Total phosphorus	409.35	LB/YR
6.	Rivanna River	Benthic TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Watershed	Albemarle, Greene, Nelson, Orange	H27R, H28R	Sediment	10,229	Lbs/Day
7.	Jackson River	Benthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia	Alleghany, Bath, Highland	I04R, I09R	Total phosphorus	72,955	LB/GS²
8.	Jackson River	Benthic TMDL Development for the Jackson River, Virginia	Alleghany, Bath, Highland	I04R, I09R	Total nitrogen	220,134	LB/GS
9.	Little Calfpasture	Total Maximum Daily Load Development to Address a Benthic Impairment in the Little Calfpasture River, Rockbridge County, Virginia	Rockbridge	132R	Sediment	30.4	T/YR
10.	Phelps Branch	Phelps Branch Sediment TMDL Development Report for a Benthic Impairment in Appomattox County, Virginia	Appomattox	H06R	Sediment	115.7	T/YR
11.	Long Branch	Sediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia	Amherst	H11R	Sediment	16.2	T/YR
12.	Buffalo River	Sediment TMDL Development Report for Benthic Impairments in Long Branch and Buffalo River in Amherst County, Virginia	Amherst	H11R	Sediment	306.4	T/YR
13.	Chickahominy River	Benthic TMDL Development for Chickahominy River, Virginia	Hanover, Henrico	G05R	Sediment	294.03	T/YR
14.	Colliers Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River, and Cedar Creek and a Sediment TMDL Development for Colliers Creek	Rockbridge	138R	Sediment	103.4	T/YR
15.	Angola Creek (1) - VAC-J06R_ANG01A00	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Cumberland	J06	E. coli	0	cfu/year
16.	Angola Creek (2) - VAC-J06R_ANG02A00	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Cumberland	J06	E. coli	0	cfu/year
17.	Horsepen Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Cumberland	J06	E. coli	0	cfu/year
18.	Little Sandy Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J03	E. coli	0	cfu/year
19.	Saylers Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J06	E. coli	0	cfu/year
20.	Spring Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J02	E. coli	0	cfu/year
21.	West Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Amelia	J11	E. coli	0	cfu/year
22.	Briery Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J05	E. coli	3.50E+09	cfu/year
23.	Bush River (1) - VAC-J04R_BSR02A02	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J04, J05	E. coli	3.50E+09	cfu/year
24.	Bush River (2) - VAC-J03R_BSR03A02	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Prince Edward	J03, J04, J05	E. coli	3.50E+09	cfu/year
25.	Swift Creek (1) - VAP-J16R_SFT01A00	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Chesterfield	J16	E. coli	8.37E+09	cfu/year
26.	Swift Creek (2) - VAP-J17R_SFT01B98	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Chesterfield	J16, J17	E. coli	3.24E+11	cfu/year
27.	Swift Creek (3) - VAP-J17R_SFT01C98	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Chesterfield	J16, J17	E. coli	4.76E+11	cfu/year
28.	Flat Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Nottoway, Amelia	J08, J09	E. coli	5.24E+11	cfu/year
29.	Nibbs Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Amelia	J09	E. coli	5.24E+11	cfu/year
30.	Deep Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Nottoway	J11	E. coli	8.71E+11	cfu/year
31.	Appomattox River (1) - VAC-J01R_APP03A02, VAC-J01R_APP04A02, VAC-J01R_APP05A04, VAC-J06R_APP05A02, VAP-J07R_APP01A98, VAP-J10R_APP01A98	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Cumberland, Powhatan, Amelia, Prince Edward, Appomattox	J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07	E. coli	1.07E+13	cfu/year
32.	Appomattox River (2), lower - VAP-J15R_APP01A98	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Chesterfield, Cumberland, Powhatan, Nottoway, Amelia, Dinwiddie, Prince Edward, Appomattox	J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15	E. coli	1.66E+13	cfu/year
33.	Appomattox River and tributaries, lower tidal (3) - VAP-J15E_APP01A98, VAP-J15E_APP02A98, VAP-J15E_APP02B12	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Appomattox River Basin	Chesterfield, Cumberland, Nottoway, Petersburg, Amelia, Colonial Heights, Prince Edward, Appomattox	J01, J02, J03, J04, J05, J06, J07, J08, J09, J10, J11, J12, J13, J14, J15, J16, J17	E. coli	7.47E+13	cfu/year
34.	Bear Garden Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Bear Garden Creek Watershed	Buckingham	H20	E. coli	3.15E+08	cfu/day
35.	Stonewall Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek	Appomattox	H05	E. coli	9.28E+10	cfu/year
36.	Bent Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek	Appomattox	H07	E. coli	2.26E+11	cfu/year
37.	North Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek	Appomattox	H06	E. coli	2.96E+11	cfu/year
38.	Wreck Island Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek	Appomattox	H06	E. coli	8.76E+11	cfu/year
39.	Walkers Ford Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Bent Creek, North Creek, Stonewall Creek, Walkers Ford Creek, and Wreck Island Creek	Amherst	H05	E. coli	8.90E+11	cfu/year
40.	Bleakhorn Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments	Suffolk	G13	Fecal coliform	2.66E+09	MPN/day
41.	Knotts Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments	Suffolk	G13	Fecal coliform	1.07E+10	MPN/day
42.	Bennett Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Bleakhorn Creek, Bennett Creek, and Knotts Creek Bacterial Impairments	Suffolk	G13	Fecal coliform	6.37E+10	MPN/day
43.	Chickahominy River and tributaries	E. coli TMDL Development for Chickahominy River and Tributaries	New Kent, Henrico, Charles City, Hanover	G05, G06, G07	E. coli	2.41E+12	cfu/year
44.	Chuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Chuckatuck Creek and Brewers Creek Watershed	Isle of Wight	G11	Fecal coliform	4.79E+11	MPN/day
45.	Paradise Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed	Portsmouth	G15	Enterococci	5.04E+11	cfu/day
46.	Lafayette River, upper	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed	Norfolk	G15	Enterococci	1.05E+13	cfu/day
47.	Lower and Upper Western Branch, Elizabeth River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed	Chesapeake, Portsmouth	G15	Enterococci	2.00E+13	cfu/day
48.	Upper Mainstem, Lower Southern Branch, Lower Eastern Branch Elizabeth River, Broad Creek, Indian River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Elizabeth River Watershed	Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Norfolk	G15, K39	Enterococci	5.78E+13	cfu/day
49.	Fourmile Creek	Bacteria TMDL for Fourmile Creek	Henrico	G02	E. coli	3.99E+10	cfu/year
50.	Hardware River, North Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River	Albemarle	H18	E. coli	0.06E+12	cfu/year
51.	Hardware River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for North Fork Hardware River and Hardware River	Fluvanna, Albemarle	H18, H19	E. coli	0.02E+13	cfu/year
52.	Walker Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek	Rockbridge	I34	E. coli	6.00E+10	cfu/year
53.	Otts Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek	Augusta	I34	E. coli	9.00E+10	cfu/year
54.	Hays Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hays Creek, Moffatts Creek, Walker Creek, and Otts Creek	Rockbridge	I34	E. coli	2.00E+11	cfu/year
55.	Hoffler Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Hoffler Creek Watershed	Portsmouth	G15	Enterococci	5.39E+11	cfu/day
56.	Powell Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover	Prince George	G03	E. coli	6.12E+10	cfu/year
57.	Bailey Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover	Prince George	G03	E. coli	1.62E+11	cfu/year
58.	Bailey Bay, Bailey Creek, Cattail Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover	Prince George, Hopewell	G03	E. coli	8.47E+12	cfu/year
59.	James River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River - Hopewell to Westover	Prince George, Charles City, Hopewell	G03	E. coli	8.67E+14	cfu/year
60.	Austin Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21	E. coli	1.62E+10	cfu/year
61.	Fisby Branch	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21	E. coli	2.15E+10	cfu/year
62.	Rock Island Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H17	E. coli	3.38E+10	cfu/year
63.	Slate River, upper	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21	E. coli	4.22E+10	cfu/year
64.	Troublesome Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21	E. coli	5.23E+10	cfu/year
65.	North River	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21	E. coli	5.52E+10	cfu/year
66.	Ballinger Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Albemarle	H17	E. coli	5.75E+10	cfu/year
67.	Totier Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Albemarle	H17	E. coli	1.62E+11	cfu/year
68.	Slate River, lower	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River Basin	Buckingham	H21, H22	E. coli	3.19E+12	cfu/year
69.	Fine Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Powhatan	H38	E. coli	3.66E+10	cfu/year
70.	Big Lickinghole Creek, Little Lickinghole Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Goochland	H37	E. coli	7.94E+10	cfu/year
71.	Byrd Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Goochland, Fluvanna	H34	E. coli	1.08E+11	cfu/year
72.	Upper James River	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Cumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland	H33, H34, H37	E. coli	3.50E+11	cfu/year
73.	Beaverdam Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Goochland	H38	E. coli	1.60E+12	cfu/year
74.	James River, lower	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - Lower Piedmont Region	Cumberland, Fluvanna, Powhatan, Goochland	H33, H34, H37, H38	E. coli	8.20E+12	cfu/year
75.	No Name Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Chesterfield	G01	E. coli	4.66E+11	cfu/year
76.	Bernards Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Powhatan	H39	E. coli	1.67E+12	cfu/year
77.	Goode Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Richmond City	G01	E. coli	2.52E+12	cfu/year
78.	Gillies Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Henrico, Richmond City	G01	E. coli	2.93E+12	cfu/year
79.	Powhite Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Chesterfield	H39	E. coli	3.34E+12	cfu/year
80.	Almond Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Henrico	G01	E. coli	4.39E+12	cfu/year
81.	Falling Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Chesterfield, Richmond City	G01	E. coli	1.64E+13	cfu/year
82.	Reedy Creek	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Richmond City	H39	E. coli	8.23E+13	cfu/year
83.	James River, tidal	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Henrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield	G01, G02, H39	E. coli	3.76E+14	cfu/year
84.	James River, lower	Bacterial Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the James River and Tributaries - City of Richmond	Henrico, Richmond City, Goochland, Powhatan, Chesterfield	H39	E. coli	3.06E+15	cfu/year
85.	Ivy Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Lynchburg, Bedford	H03	E. coli	4.07E+12	cfu/year
86.	Burton Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Lynchburg, Campbell	H03	E. coli	3.47E+12	cfu/year
87.	Judith Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Lynchburg, Bedford	H03	E. coli	3.26E+11	cfu/year
88.	Tomahawk Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Bedford, Campbell, Lynchburg	H03	E. coli	1.01E+12	cfu/year
89.	Fishing Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Lynchburg	H03	E. coli	3.76E+13	cfu/year
90.	Blackwater Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Lynchburg	H03	E. coli	3.61E+14	cfu/year
91.	James River, lower	E.coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Amherst, Bedford, Campbell, Lynchburg	H03, H05	E. coli	1.33E+15	cfu/year
92.	Baptist Run	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River	York	G11	E. coli	3.89E+09	cfu/year
93.	Deep Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River	Newport News	G11, C07	Enterococci	5.59E+12	cfu/year
94.	Skiffes Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River	James City	G11	Fecal coliform	2.46E+12	cfu/year
95.	James River, Warwick River	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Warwick River	Newport News, York	G11	Fecal coliform	3.04E+12	cfu/year
96.	Kings Creek and Bay	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds	Isle of Wight	G11	Fecal coliform	1.23E+09	counts/day
97.	Ballard Creek and Bay	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development Kings Creek and Bay and Ballard Creek and Bay Watersheds	Isle of Wight	G11	Fecal coliform	1.64E+09	counts/day
98.	Lawnes Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Lawnes Creek Bacterial Impairment	Surry	G11	Fecal coliform	5.94E+08	MPN/day
99.	Looney Creek	Bacteria TMDL for Looney Creek	Botetourt	I26	E. coli	1.84E+10	cfu/year
100.	Buffalo Creek, South Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Botetourt, Rockbridge	I38	E. coli	2.01E+11	cfu/year
101.	Colliers Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Rockbridge	I38	E. coli	4.75E+11	cfu/year
102.	Cedar Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Rockbridge	I28	E. coli	5.01E+11	cfu/year
103.	Buffalo Creek, North Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Rockbridge	I38	E. coli	6.52E+11	cfu/year
104.	Buffalo Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Rockbridge	I38	E. coli	1.91E+12	cfu/year
105.	Maury River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek, North Fork Buffalo Creek, South Fork Buffalo Creek, Buffalo Creek, Maury River and Cedar Creek and a Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Colliers Creek	Buena Vista, Rockbridge	I37, I38	E. coli	2.98E+13	cfu/year
106.	Powhatan Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek	James City	G10	E. coli	1.78E+13	cfu/year
107.	Mill Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek	James City	G10	Enterococci	3.63E+12	cfu/year
108.	Powhatan Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Mill Creek and Powhatan Creek	James City	G10	Enterococci	7.24E+12	cfu/year
109.	Moores Creek	Development of the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Fecal Coliform Bacteria in Moore's Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia	Charlottesville, Albemarle	H28	Fecal coliform	3.30E+13	cfu/year
110.	Morris Creek	Morris Creek (tidal), Charles City County Total Maximum Daily Load for Bacteria Contamination Impaired for Recreational Use	Charles City	G08	Enterococci	2.92E+10	cfu/day
111.	Shingle Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River	Suffolk	G13, K39	Fecal coliform	2.78E+09	cfu/year
112.	Nansemond River, upper and middle	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River	Isle of Wight, Suffolk	G12, G13, G14	Fecal coliform	3.89E+10	cfu/year
113.	Shingle Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River	Suffolk	G13, K39	Enterococci	2.19E+10	cfu/year
114.	Nansemond River, upper	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River	Isle of Wight, Suffolk	G12, G13, G14	Enterococci	9.99E+10	cfu/year
115.	Nansemond River (Lake Meade)	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load for the Nansemond River	Suffolk	G12, G13	Enterococci	9.99E+10	cfu/year
116.	Pagan River, middle and upper	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River	Isle of Wight	G11	Enterococci	3.01E+12	cfu/year
117.	Pagan River and Jones Creek	Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Pagan River	Isle of Wight	G11	Fecal coliform	2.15E+12	cfu/year
118.	Reed Creek, lower	Bacteria TMDL for Reed Creek	Bedford	H01	E. coli	0	cfu/year
119.	Beaver Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Albemarle	H23	E. coli	3.29E+10	cfu/year
120.	Mechums River	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Albemarle	H23	E. coli	3.31E+10	cfu/year
121.	Preddy Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Greene, Albemarle	H27	E. coli	2.43E+11	cfu/year
122.	Rivanna River, North Fork	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Greene, Albemarle	H27	E. coli	2.15E+12	cfu/year
123.	Meadow Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Charlottesville	H28	E. coli	3.89E+12	cfu/year
124.	Rivanna River	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Rivanna River Mainstem, North Fork Rivanna River, Preddy Creek and Tributaries, Meadow Creek, Mechums River, and Beaver Creek Watersheds	Charlottesville, Albemarle, Greene	H23, H24, H25, H26, H27, H28	E. coli	4.93E+12	cfu/year
125.	Rockfish River, North Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River	Nelson	H15	E. coli	8.44E+11	cfu/year
126.	Rockfish River, South Fork	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River	Nelson	H15	E. coli	4.40E+12	cfu/year
127.	Rockfish River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Rockfish River, North Fork Rockfish River, and South Fork Rockfish River	Nelson	H15, H16	E. coli	5.76E+12	cfu/year
128.	Tuckahoe Creek and tributaries	Bacteria TMDL for Tuckahoe Creek, Little Tuckahoe Creek, Anderson, Broad, Georges and Readers Branches, and Deep Run	Henrico, Goochland	H39	E. coli	1.05E+13	cfu/year
129.	Turner Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst	H12	E. coli	1.57E+11	cfu/year
130.	Mill Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst	H11	E. coli	2.08E+11	cfu/year
131.	Hat Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Nelson	H09	E. coli	6.02E+11	cfu/year
132.	Rutledge Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst	H12	E. coli	1.15E+12	cfu/year
133.	Rucker Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Nelson	H13	E. coli	1.32E+12	cfu/year
134.	Piney River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst, Nelson	H10	E. coli	2.44E+12	cfu/year
135.	Buffalo River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst	H11, H12	E. coli	2.54E+12	cfu/year
136.	Tye River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Hat Creek, Piney River, Rucker Run, Mill Creek, Rutledge Creek, Turner Creek, Buffalo River and Tye River	Amherst, Nelson	H09, H10, H11, H12, H13	E. coli	1.33E+13	cfu/year
137.	Upham Brook and tributaries	Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upham Brook Watershed	Henrico, Richmond City	G05	E. coli	8.04E+10	cfu/year
138.	White Oak Swamp	Bacteria TMDL for White Oak Swamp	Henrico	G06	E. coli	1.58E+12	cfu/year
139.	Willis River and tributaries	Fecal coliform TMDL Development for Willis River	Cumberland, Buckingham	H35, H36	Fecal coliform	3.15E+11	cfu/year
140.	North Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed	Fluvanna	H20R	Sediment	7.29	tons/yr
141.	North Creek	Benthic Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the North Creek Watershed	Fluvanna	H20R	Total phosphorus	187.3	lbs/yr
142.	Turkey Island Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed	Henrico, Charles City	G02R	E. coli	4.31E+11	cfu/year
143.	James River from Westover to Chippokes Point	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed	Charles City, Prince George	G02R, G04R	E. coli	4.25E+13	cfu/year
144.	James River from Chippokes Point to Claremont	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Turkey Island Creek and James River Westover to Claremont Watershed	Prince George, Surry	G04E, G04R	E. coli	4.99E+13	cfu/year
145.	Moores Creek	Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch	Albemarle, City of Charlottesville	H28	Sediment	809.48	tons/yr
146.	Lodge Creek	Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch	Albemarle, City of Charlottesville	H28	Sediment	46.25	tons/yr
147.	Meadow Creek	Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch	Albemarle, City of Charlottesville	H28	Sediment	452.33	tons/yr
148.	Schenks Branch	Sediment TMDLs for Moores Creek, Lodge Creek, Meadow Creek, and Schenks Branch	City of Charlottesville	H28	Sediment	134.52	tons/yr
149.	James River, upper	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Amherst, Bedford	H01R, I28R	E. coli	2.27E+11	cfu/year
150.	Beaver Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Campbell	H05R	E. coli	3.26E+11	cfu/year
151.	Pedlar River	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Amherst	H02R	E. coli	7.86E+11	cfu/year
152.	Harris Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for the James River and Tributaries near Lynchburg, VA	Amherst	H04R	E. coli	1.02E+13	cfu/year
153.	Diascund Creek, nontidal	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	New Kent	G09R	E. coli	2.51E+11	cfu/year
154.	Beaverdam Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	New Kent	G09R	E. coli	1.27E+11	cfu/year
155.	Unnamed tributary to Beaverdam Creek (SAH)	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	New Kent	G09R	E. coli	4.52E+10	cfu/year
156.	Barrows Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	Charles City	G08R	E. coli	6.90E+10	cfu/year
157.	Mill Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	James City	G08R	E. coli	9.90E+11	cfu/year
158.	Diascund Creek, tidal	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	New Kent, James City	G08E	Enterococci	7.12E+12	cfu/year
159.	Chickahominy River	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	New Kent, James City, Charles City	G08E	Enterococci	9.57E+13	cfu/year
160.	Gordon Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development for Lower Chickahominy River Watershed Located in Charles City, James City, and New Kent Counties, VA	James City	G08E	Enterococci	6.15E+12	cfu/year
161.	Woods Creek	Bacteria TMDL Development and a Proactive Approach to Address the Benthic Impairment for Woods Creek, Rockbridge County and City of Lexington, Virginia	Rockbridge, City of Lexington	I35R	E.coli	3.97E+11	cfu/year
162.	Sinking Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I18R	E. coli	1.17E+9	counts/year
163.	Barbours Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Craig	I22R	E. coli	2.36E+9	counts/year
164.	Lapsley Run	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I24R	E. coli	2.45E+8	counts/year
165.	Little Patterson Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I22R	E. coli	5.38E+8	counts/year
166.	Upper Craig Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Craig	I19R	E. coli	3.93E+9	counts/year
167.	Middle Craig Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Craig	I22R	E. coli	1.54E+10	counts/year
168.	Lower Craig Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I22R	E. coli	2.07E+10	counts/year
169.	Catawba Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I25R	E. coli	3.00E+9	counts/year
170.	James River	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I18R	E. coli	4.19E+10	counts/year
171.	Catawba Creek	Bacteria and Sediment Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the James River and Tributaries Located in Botetourt and Craig Counties Virginia	Botetourt	I25R	Sediment	29.44	tons/year
172.	Bullpasture River	Bacteria TMDL Development for the Bullpasture River in Highland County, Virginia	Highland	I13R	E. coli	2.63E+12	counts/year
173.	Blue Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	20,750	lbs/year
174.	Marsh Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	5,210	lbs/year
175.	Preddy Creek	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	105,600	lbs/year
176.	Preddy Creek North Branch	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	47,940	lbs/year
177.	Quarter Creek	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	11,020	lbs/year
178.	Standardsville Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	6,105	lbs/year
179.	Swift Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	89,130	lbs/year
180.	Unnamed tributary to Flat Branch	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Sediment	27,890	lbs/year
181.	Blue Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Total Phosphorus	21.8	lbs/year
182.	Standardsville Run	Benthic TMDL Development for the North Fork Rivanna River Watershed and Tributaries Located in Albemarle, Greene, and Orange Counties	Albemarle, Greene, Orange	H27R	Total Phosphorus	4.6	lbs/year
Notes: ¹The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that the Department of Environmental Quality tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria. ²GS means growing season.

B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.

TABLE B1 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN RECOMMENDED SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION
Stream Name	Segment No.	Mile to Mile	Classification	Comments
Maury River	2-4	80.3-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries
James River	2-5	271.5-266.0	W.Q.	Main only
James River	2-6	266.0-115.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries except Tye & Rivanna River
Tye River	2-7	41.7-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries except Rutledge Creek
Rutledge Creek	2-8	3.0-0.0	W.Q.	Main only
Piney River	2-9	20.6-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries
Rivanna River	2-10	20.0-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries
Rivanna River	2-11	38.1-20.0	W.Q.	Main only
Rivanna River	2-12	76.7-38.1	E.L.	Main & tributaries
S.F. Rivanna River	2-13	12.2-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries
Mechums River	2-14	23.1-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries
N.F. Rivanna River	2-15	17.0-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries except Standardsville Run
Standardsville Run	2-16	1.2-0.0	W.Q.	Main only
Appomattox River	2-17	156.2-27.7	E.L.	Main & tributaries except Buffalo Creek, Courthouse Branch, and Deep Creek
Buffalo Creek	2-18	20.9-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 9.3
Unnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek @ R.M. 9.3	2-19	1.3-0.0	W.Q.	Main only
Courthouse Branch	2-20	0.6-0.0	W.Q.	Main only
Deep Creek	2-21	29.5-0.0	E.L.	Main & tributaries except unnamed tributary @ R.M. 25.0
Unnamed tributary of Deep Creek @ R.M. 25.0	2-22	2.2-0.0	W.Q.	Main only

TABLE B2 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN LOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT⁷
Stream Name	Segment Number	Classification	Mile to Mile	Significant Discharges	Total Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD₅ lbs/day	Wasteload Allocation BOD₅ lbs/day²	Reserve BOD₅ lbs/day⁵
Cedar Creek	2-3	E.L.	1.9-0.0	Natural Bridge, Inc. STP	35.0	28.0	7.0 (20%)
Elk Creek	2-3	E.L.	2.8-0.0	Natural Bridge Camp for Boys STP	7.0	3.3	3.7 (53%)
Little Calfpasture River	2-4	E.L.	10.9-4.0	Craigsville	12.0	9.6	2.4 (20%)
Cabin River	2-4	E.L.	1.7-0.0	Millboro	Self -sustaining	None	None
Maury River	2-4	E.L.	19.6-12.2	Lexington STP	380.0	380.0	None
Maury River	2-4	E.L.	12.2-1.2	Georgia Bonded Fibers	760.0	102.0³	238.0 (31%)
				Buena Vista STP		420.0
Maury River	2-4	E.L.	1.2-0.0	Lees Carpets	790.0	425.0³	290.0 (37%)
				Glasgow STP		75.0
James River	2-5	W.Q.	271.5-266.0	Owens-Illinois	4,640.0	4,640.0³	None
James River	2-6	E.L.	257.5-231.0	Lynchburg STP	10,100.0	8,000.0	2,060.0 (20%)
				Babcock & Wilcox-NNFD		40.0³
James River	2-6	E.L.	231.0-202.0	Virginia Fibre	3,500.0	3,500.0	None
Rutledge Creek	2-8	W.Q.	3.0-0.0	Amherst STP	46.0	37.0	9.0 (20%)
Town Creek	2-7	E.L.	2.1-0.0	Lovingston STP	26.0	21.0	5.0 (20%)
Ivy Creek	2-6	E.L.	0.1-0.0	Schuyler	13.8	11.0	2.8 (20%)
James River	2-6	E.L.	186.0-179.0	Uniroyal, Inc.	1,400.0	19.3⁶	1,336.0 (95%)
				Scottsville STP		45.0
North Creek	2-6	E.L.	3.1-0.0	Fork Union STP	31.0	25.0	6.0 (20%)
Howells Branch and Lickinghole Creek	2-14	E.L.	0.7-0.0	Morton Frozen Foods	20.0	20.0³	None
Standardsville Run	2-16	W.Q.	1.2-0.0	Standardsville STP	17.9	14.3	3.6 (20%)
Rivanna River	2-11	W.Q.	23.5-20.0	Lake Monticello STP	480.0	380.0	100.0 (20%)
Rivanna River	2-10	E.L.	15.0-0.0	Palmyra	250.0	4.0	158.0 (63%)
				Schwarzenbach Huber		88.0³
Unnamed tributary of Whispering Creek	2-6	E.L.	1.2-0.0	Dillwyn STP	38.0	30.0	8.0 (21%)
South Fork Appomattox River	2-17	E.L.	5.5-0.0	Appomattox Lagoon	18.8	15.0	3.8 (20%)
Unnamed tributary of Buffalo Creek	2-19	W.Q.	1.3-0.0	Hampden-Sydney Coll. STP	10.0	8.0	2.0 (20%)
Appomattox River	2-17	E.L.	106.1-88.0	Farmville STP	280.0	220.0	60.0 (21%)
Unnamed tributary of Little Guinea Creek	2-17	E.L.	2.5-1.3	Cumberland H.S. Lagoon	0.6	0.5	0.1 (20%)
Unnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek	2-17	E.L.	0.68-0.0	Cumberland Courthouse	8.8	7.0	1.8 (20%)
Courthouse Branch	2-22	W.Q.	2.2-0.0	Amelia STP	21.0	17.0	4.0 (20%)
Unnamed tributary of Deep Creek	2-22	W.Q.	2.2-0.0	Crewe STP	50.3^11,12	50.1^{11, 12}	0.2 (0.4%)^11,12,13
Notes: ¹Recommended classification. ²Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%. ³Load allocation based on published NPDES permits. ⁴This assimilative capacity is based upon an ammonia loading no greater than 125.1 lbs/day. ⁵Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted. ⁶No NPDES Permits published (BPT not established) allocation base on maximum value monitored. ⁷This table is for the existing discharge point. The recommended plan may involve relocation or elimination of stream discharge. ⁸Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc. ⁹Discharges into Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River. ¹⁰Discharges into Wilson Creek, near its confluence with Jackson River. ¹¹Five-day Carbonaceous Biological Oxygen Demand (cBOD₅). ¹²Revision supersedes all subsequent Crewe STP stream capacity, allocation, and reserve references. ¹³0.4% reserve: determined by SWCB Piedmont Regional Office. Source: Wiley & Wilson, Inc.

TABLE B3 - UPPER JAMES RIVER BASIN ADDITIONAL LOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON RECOMMENDED DISCHARGE POINT
Stream Name	Segment Number	Classification¹		Significant Discharges	Total Assimilative Capacity of Stream BOD₅ lbs/day	Wasteload² Allocation BOD₅ lbs/day	Reserve⁴ BOD₅ lbs/day⁵
Mill Creek	2-4	E.L.	5.5-0.0	Millboro	30.0	7.3	22.7 (76%)
Calfpasture River	2-4	E.L.	4.9-0.0	Goshen	65.0	12.0	53.0 (82%)
Maury River	2-4	E.L.	1.2-0.0	Lees Carpet	790.0	425.0³	235.0 (30%)
				Glasgow Regional STP		130.0
Buffalo River	2-7	E.L.	9.6-0.0	Amherst STP	150.0	120.0	30.0 (20%)
Rockfish River	2-6	E.L.	9.5-0.0	Schuyler STP	110.0	25.0	85.0 (77%)
Standardsville Run		E.L.		Standardsville	Land Application Recommended
South Fork Appomattox River		E.L.		Appomattox Lagoon	Connect to Recommended Facility in Roanoke River Basin
Buffalo Creek	2-17	E.L.	9.3-7.7	Hampden-Sydney College	46.0	23.0	23.0 (50%)
Unnamed tributary of Tear Wallet Creek		E.L.		Cumberland Courthouse	Land Application Recommended
Courthouse Branch		E.L.		Amelia	Land Application Recommended
Deep Creek	2-17	E.L.	25.0-12.8	Crewe STP	69.0	55.0	14.0 (20%)
Notes: ¹Recommended classification. ²Based on 2020 loads or stream assimilative capacity less 20%. ³Load allocation based on published NPDES permit. ⁴Percentages refer to reserve as percent of total assimilative capacity. Minimum reserve for future growth and modeling accuracy is 20% unless otherwise noted. ⁵Assimilative capacity will be determined upon completion of the ongoing study by Hydroscience, Inc. Source: Wiley & Wilson, Inc.

TABLE B4 - SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA
Stream Name	Segment Number	Mile to Mile	Stream Classification	Comments
Back Creek	2-1	16.06-8.46	W.Q.	Main Only
Jackson River	2-1	95.70-24.90	E.L.	Main and Tributaries
Jackson River	2-2	24.90-0.00	W.Q.	Main Only
Jackson River	2-2	24.90-0.00	E.L.	Tributaries Only
James River	2-3	349.50-308.50	E.L.	Main and Tributaries
James River	2-3	308.50-279.41	E.L.	Main and Tributaries

TABLE B5 - UPPER JAMES-JACKSON RIVER SUBAREA WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS BASED ON EXISTING DISCHARGE POINT¹
MAP LOCATION	STREAM NAME	SEGMENT NUMBER	SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION STANDARDS	MILE to² MILE	DISCHARGER	VPDES PERMIT NUMBER	VPDES PERMIT LIMITS BOD₅ kg/day	303(e)³ WASTELOAD ALLOCATION BOD₅ kg/day
1	Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	93.05-	Virginia Trout	VA0071722	N/A	Secondary
B	Warm Springs Run	2-1	E.L.	3.62-0.00	Warm Springs STP	VA0028233	9.10	Secondary
3	Back Creek	2-1	W.Q.	16.06-8.46	VEPCO	VA0053317	11.50	11.50
C	X-trib to Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	0.40-0.0	Bacova	VA0024091	9.10	Secondary
D	Hot Springs Run	2-1	E.L.	5.30-0.00	Hot Springs Reg. STP	VA0066303	51.10	Secondary
E	X-trib to Cascades Creek	2-1	E.L.	3.00-0.00	Ashwood-Healing Springs STP	VA0023726	11.30	Secondary
F	Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	50.36-	U.S. Forest Service Bolar Mountain	VA0032123	1.98	Secondary
G	Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	43.55	U.S. Army COE Morris Hill Complex	VA0032115	1.70	Secondary
H	Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	29.84-	Alleghany County Clearwater Park	VA0027955	5.70	Secondary
4	Jackson River	2-1	E.L.	25.99	Covington City Water Treatment Plant	VA0058491	N/A	Secondary
5	Jackson River	2-2	W.Q.	24.64-19.03	Westvaco	VA0003646	4,195.00	4,195.00⁴
6					Covington City⁵Asphalt Plant	VA0054411	N/A	N/A
7					Hercules, Inc⁶	VA0003450	94.00	94.00
J	Jackson River	2-2	W.Q.	19.03-10.5	Covington STP	VA0025542	341.00	341.00
K	Jackson River			10.5-0.0	Low Moor STP⁷	VA0027979	22.70	22.70
M					D.S. Lancaster CC⁸	VA0028509	3.60	3.60
L					Selma STP⁹	VA0028002	59.00	59.00
10					The Chessie System¹⁰	VA0003344	N/A	N/A
N					Clifton Forge STP¹¹	VA0002984	227.00	227.00
11					Lydall¹²	VA0002984	6.00	6.00
P					Iron Gate STP¹³	VA0020541	60.00	60.00
8	Paint Bank Branch	2-2	E.L.	1.52	VDGIF Paint Bank Hatchery	VA0098432	N/A	Secondary
I	Jerrys Run	2-2	E.L.	6.72-	VDOT 1-64 Rest Area	VA0023159	0.54	Secondary
AA	East Branch (Sulfer Spring)	2-2	E.L.	2.16	Norman F. Nicholas	VA0078403	0.05	Secondary
BB	East Branch (Sulfer Spring)	2-2	E.L.	1.91-	Daryl C. Clark	VA0067890	0.068	Secondary
9	Smith Creek	2-2	E.L.	3.44-	Clifton Forge Water Treatment Plant	VA0006076	N/A	Secondary
O	Wilson Creek	2-2	E.L.	0.20-0.0	Cliftondale¹⁴Park STP	VA0027987	24.00	Secondary
2	Pheasanty Run	2-3	E.L.	0.01-	Coursey Springs	VA0006491	434.90	Secondary
Q	Grannys Creek	2-3	E.L.	1.20-	Craig Spring Conference Grounds	VA0027952	3.40	Secondary
CC	X-trib to Big Creek	2-3	E.L.	1.10-	Homer Kelly Residence	VA0074926	0.05	Secondary
12	Mill Creek	2-3	E.L.	0.16-	Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.	VA0004839	N/A	Secondary
R	John Creek	2-3	E.L.	0.20-	New Castle STP (old)	VA0024139	21.00	Secondary
S	Craig Creek	2-3	E.L.	48.45-36.0	New Castle STP (new)	VA0064599	19.90	Secondary
T	Craig Creek	2-3	E.L.	46.98-	Craig County Schools McCleary E.S.	VA0027758	0.57	Secondary
DD	Eagle Rock Creek	2-3	E.L.	0.08-	Eagle Rock STP^{15 (Proposed)}	VA0076350	2.30	Secondary
U	X-trib to Catawba Creek	2-3	E.L.	0.16	VDBHDS Catawba Hospital	VA0029475	13.60	Secondary
14	Catawba Creek	2-3	E.L.	23.84	Tarmac-Lonestar	VA0078393	0.80	Secondary
FF	Borden Creek	2-3	E.L.	2.00-	Shenandoah Baptist Church Camp	VA0075451	0.88	Secondary
EE	X-trib to Borden Creek	2-3	E.L.	0.36	David B. Pope	VA0076031	0.07	Secondary
V	X-trib to Catawba Creek	2-3	E.L.	3.21-	U.S. FHA Flatwood Acres	VA0068233	0.03	Secondary
W	Catawba Creek	2-3	E.L.	11.54-	Fincastle STP	VA0060364	8.50	Secondary
X	Looney Mill Creek	2-3	E.L.	1.83-	VDOT I-81 Rest Area	VA0023141	0.91	Secondary
Y	X-trib to Stoney	2-3	E.L.	0.57	VDOC Field Unit No. 25 Battle Creek	VA0023523	1.10	Secondary
Z	James River	2-3	E.L.	308.5-286.0	Buchanan STP	VA0022225	27.00	Secondary
Notes: N/A Currently No BOD₅ limits or wasteload have been imposed by the VPDES permit. Should BOD₅ limits (wasteload) be imposed a WQMP amendment would be required for water quality limited segments only. ¹Secondary treatment levels are required in effluent limiting (E.L.) segments. In water quality limiting (W.Q.) segments quantities listed represent wasteload allocations. ²Ending river miles have not been determined for some effluent limited segments. ³These allocations represent current and original (1977 WQMP) modeling. Future revisions may be necessary based on Virginia State Water Control Board modeling. ⁴The total assimilative capacity at critical stream flow for this portion of Segment 2-2 has been modeled and verified by Hydroscience, Inc. (March 1977) to be 4,914 kg/day BOD₅. ⁵The discharge is to an unnamed tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 22.93. ⁶The discharge is at Jackson River mile 19.22. ⁷The discharge is to the mouth of Karnes Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 5.44. ⁸The discharge is at Jackson River mile 6.67. ⁹The discharge is at Jackson River mile 5.14. ¹⁰The discharge is at Jackson River mile 4.72. ¹¹The discharge is at Jackson River mile 3.46. ¹²The discharge is at Jackson River mile 1.17. ¹³The discharge is at Jackson River mile 0.76. ¹⁴The discharge is to the mouth of Wilson Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 2.44. ¹⁵The discharge is to the mouth of Eagle Rock Creek, a tributary to the Jackson River at Jackson River mile 330.35.

TABLE B6 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN STREAM CLASSIFICATIONS - JAMES RIVER BASIN
SEGMENT	SEGMENT NUMBER	MILE TO MILE	CLASSIFICATION
USGS HUC02080206 James River	2-19	115.0-60.5	W.Q.
USGS HUC02080207 Appomattox	2-23	30.1-0.0	W.Q.
Notes: A new stream segment classification for the Upper James River Basin was adopted in 1981. The SWCB will renumber or realign these segments in the future to reflect these changes. This Plan covers only a portion of these segments.

TABLE B7 - RICHMOND CRATER INTERIM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN – CURRENT PERMITTED WASTELOADS (March 1988)

	SUMMER (June-October)						WINTER (November-May)
	FLOW (mgd)	BOD₅		NH₃-N¹		DO² (mg/l)	FLOW (mgd)	BOD₅		NH₃-N¹		DO² (mg/l)
	FLOW (mgd)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)	FLOW (mgd)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)
City of Richmond STP³	45.00	3002	8.0	-	-	-	45.00	5367	14.3	(lbs/d)	-	-
E.I. DuPont-Spruance	8.68	936	-	-	-	-	8.68	936	-	-	-	-
Falling Creek STP	9.00	1202	16.0	-	-	5.9	9.00	2253	30.0	-	-	5.9
Proctor's Creek STP	6.40	1601	30.0	-	-	5.9	11.80	2952	30.0	-	-	5.9
Reynolds Metals Company	0.39	138	-	7	-	-	0.39	138	-	-	-	-
Henrico STP	30.00	3005	12.0	-	-	5.9	30.00	7260	29.0	7	-	5.9
American Tobacco Company	1.94	715	-	-	-	-	1.94	716	-	-	-	-
ICI Americas, Inc.	0.20	152	-	-	-	-	0.20	152	-	-	-	-
Phillip Morris-Park 500	1.50	559	-	-	-	-	1.50	557	-	-	-	-
Allied (Chesterfield)	51.00	1207	-	-	-	-	51.00	1207		-	-	-
Allied (Hopewell)	150.00	2500	-	-	-	-	150.00	2500	-	-	-	-
Hopewell Regional WTF	34.08	12507	44.0	-	-	4.8	34.08	12507	44.0	-	-	4.8
Petersburg STP	15.00	2804	22.4	-	-	5.0	15.00	2804	22.4	-	-	5.0
TOTAL	353.19	30328					358.59	39349		-
Notes: ¹NH₃-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen. ²Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. ³Richmond STP's BOD₅ is permitted as CBOD₅

TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 1990
	SUMMER (June-October)						WINTER (November-May)
	FLOW (mgd)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N^1,3		DO² (mg/l)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N¹		DO² (mg/l)
	FLOW (mgd)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)
City of Richmond STP	45.00	3002	8.0	2403	6.4	5.6	5367	14.3	5707	15.2	5.6
E.I. DuPont-Spruance	11.05	948		590		4.4	948		756		2.9
Falling Creek STP	10.10	1348	16.0	539	6.4	5.9	2023	24.0	1281	15.2	5.9
Proctor's Creek STP	12.00	1602	16.0	961	9.6	5.9	2403	24.0	1402	14.0	5.9
Reynolds Metals Co.	0.49	172		8		6.5	172		8		6.5
Henrico STP	30.00	3002	12.0	2403	9.6	5.6	4756	19.0	3504	44.0	5.6
American Tobacco Co.	2.70	715		113		5.8	715		113		5.8
ICI Americas, Inc.	0.20	167		8		5.8	167		8		3.1
Phillip Morris-Park 500	2.20	819		92		4.6	819		92		4.6
Allied (Chesterfield)	53.00	1255		442		5.7	1255		442		5.7
Allied (Hopewell)	165.00	2750		10326		6.1	2750		10326		6.1
Hopewell Regional WTF	34.07	12502	44.0	12091	36.2	4.8	12502	44.0	10291	36.2	4.8
Petersburg STP	15.00	2802	22.4	801	6.4	5.0	2802	22.4	2028	16.2	5.0
TOTAL	380.81	31084		28978			36679	35958
Notes: ¹NH₃-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen. ²Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. ³Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit.

TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATION FOR THE YEAR 2000
	SUMMER (June-October)						WINTER (November-May)
	FLOW (mgd)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N^1,3		DO² (mg/l)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N¹		DO² (mg/l)
	FLOW (mgd)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)
City of Richmond STP	45.08	3002	8.0	2403	6.4	5.6	5367	14.3	5707	15.2	5.6
E.I. DuPont-Spruance	196.99	948		590		4.4	948		756		2.9
Falling Creek STP	10.10	1348	16.0	539	6.4	5.9	2023	24.0	1281	15.2	5.9
Proctor's Creek STP	16.80	1602	11.4	961	6.9	5.9	2403	17.1	1402	10.0	5.9
Reynolds Metals Co.	0.78	172		13		6.5	172		13		6.5
Henrico STP	32.80	3002	11.0	2403	8.8	5.6	4756	17.4	3504	12.8	5.6
American Tobacco Co.	3.00	715		113		5.8	715		113		5.8
ICI Americas, Inc.	0.20	167		8		5.8	167		8		3.1
Phillip Morris-Park 500	2.90	819		92		4.6	819		92		4.6
Allied (Chesterfield)	56.00	1255		442		5.7	1255		442		5.7
Allied (Hopewell)	170.00	2750		10326		6.1	2750		10326		6.1
Hopewell Regional WTF	36.78	12502	40.7	12091	33.5	4.8	12502	40.7	10291	33.5	4.8
Petersburg STP	15.00	2802	22.4	801	6.4	5.0	2802	22.4	2028	16.2	5.0
TOTAL	406.43	31084		28982			36679		35963
Notes: ¹NH₃-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen. ²Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. ³Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit.

TABLE B7 - WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS FOR THE YEAR 2010
	SUMMER (June-October)						WINTER (November-May)
	FLOW (mgd)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N^1,3		DO² (mg/l)	CBOD₅		NH₃-N¹		DO² (mg/l)
	FLOW (mgd)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	(lbs/d)	(mg/l)	DO² (mg/l)
City of Richmond STP	45.86	3002	7.8	2403	6.3	5.6	5367	14.0	5707	14.9	5.6
E.I. DuPont-Spruance	16.99	948		590		4.4	948		756		2.9
Falling Creek STP	10.10	1348	16.0	539	6.4	5.9	2023	24.0	1281	15.2	5.9
Proctor's Creek STP	24.00	1602	8.0	961	4.8	5.9	2403	12.0	1402	7.0	5.9
Reynolds Metals Co.	0.78	172		13		6.5	172		13		6.5
Henrico STP	38.07	3002	9.5	2403	7.6	5.6	4756	15.0	3504	11.0	5.6
American Tobacco Co.	3.00	715		113		5.8	715		113		5.8
ICI Americas, Inc.	0.20	167		8		5.8	167		8		3.1
Phillip Morris-Park 500	2.90	819		92		4.6	819		92		4.6
Allied (Chesterfield)	56.00	1255		442		5.7	1255		442		5.7
Allied (Hopewell)	180.00	2750		10326		6.1	2750		10326		6.1
Hopewell Regional WTF	39.61	12502	37.8	10291	31.1	4.8	12502	37.8	10291	31.1	4.8
Petersburg STP	15.00	2802	22.4	801	6.4	5.0	2802	22.4	2028	16.2	5.0
TOTAL	432.1	31084		28982			36679		35963
Notes: ¹NH₃-N values represent ammonia as nitrogen. ²Dissolved oxygen limits represent average minimum allowable levels. ³Allied (Hopewell) allocation may be redistributed to the Hopewell Regional WTF by VPDES permit.

C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers.

The following table presents nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations for the identified significant dischargers and the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the listed facilities.

Virginia Waterbody ID	Discharger Name	VPDES Permit No.	Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)	Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)
I37R	Buena Vista STP	VA0020991	41,115	~~3,426~~ 2,778
I09R	Covington STP	VA0025542	54,820	~~4,568~~ 3,705
H02R	Georgia Pacific	VA0003026	122,489	~~49,658~~ 40,273
I37R	~~Lees Carpets~~ Mohawk Industries, Inc.	VA0004677	30,456	~~12,182~~ 9,880
I35R	Lexington-Rockbridge WQCF	VA0088161	54,820	~~4,568~~ 3,705
I09R	Low Moor STP	VA0027979	9,137	~~761~~ 617
I09R	Lower Jackson River STP	VA0090671	~~63,957~~ 47,516	~~5,330~~ 3,211
I09R	Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly VA0090671	16,441	1,112
I04R	~~MeadWestvaco~~ WestRock Virginia LLC - Covington	VA0003646	394,400	~~159,892~~ 96,711
H12R	Amherst STP	VA0031321	10,964	~~914~~ 741
H05R	BWX Technologies Inc.	VA0003697	187,000	~~1,523~~ 1,235
H05R	Greif Inc.	VA0006408	73,246	~~29,694~~ 24,082
H31R	Lake Monticello ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0024945	~~18,182~~ 14,164	~~1,515~~ 957
H31R	Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly VA0024945	4,018	272
H05R	Lynchburg STP¹	VA0024970	536,019^[⁵^]	~~33,501~~ 27,169^[⁴^]
H28R	Moores Creek ~~Regional STP~~ Advanced WRRF^[⁶ ⁸^]	VA0025518	~~274,100~~ 282,994 ^[ ³^]	~~22,842~~ 19,637 ^[ ⁴^]
H38R	Powhatan CC STP	VA0020699	8,588	~~716~~ 581
J11R	Crewe WWTP	VA0020303	9,137	~~761~~ 617
J01R	Farmville WWTP	VA0083135	43,856	~~3,655~~ 2,964
G02E	~~The Sustainability Park, LLC~~ Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly VA0002780	25,583	~~1,919~~ 768
G01E	E I du Pont - Spruance	VA0004669	201,080	~~7,816~~ 6,339
G01E	Falling Creek WWTP	VA0024996	~~153,801~~ 182,738 ^[ ³^]	~~15,380~~ 6,153 ^[⁴^]
G01E	Henrico County WWTP	VA0063690	1,142,085 ^[³^]	~~114,209~~ 45,689 ^[⁴^]
G03E	~~Honeywell – Hopewell~~ AdvanSix Resins and Chemicals LLC	VA0005291	1,090,798	~~51,592~~ 40,541
G03R	Hopewell WWTP	VA0066630	1,827,336 ^[⁷^]	~~76,139~~ 30,459^[⁸^]
G15E	HRSD – Boat Harbor STP	VA0081256	~~740,000~~ ~~304,593³~~ 473,524^[³^] [ 304,593 ³ ]	~~76,139~~ ~~38,074³~~ ~~30,459⁴~~ ~~22,844⁵~~ 43,175^[⁴^] [ 38,074 ³ 30,459 ⁴ 22,844 ⁵ ]
G11E	HRSD – James River STP	VA0081272	~~1,250,000~~ ~~243,674³~~ 378,819^[³^] [ 243,674 ³ ]	~~60,911~~ ~~30,459³~~ ~~24,367⁴~~ ~~18,276⁵~~ 34,540^[⁴^] [ 30,459 ³ 24,367 ⁴ 18,276 ⁵ ]
G10E	HRSD – Williamsburg STP	VA0081302	~~800,000~~ ~~274,133³~~ 426,171^[³^] [ 274,133 ³ ]	~~68,525~~ ~~34,267³~~ ~~27,413⁴~~ ~~20,560⁵~~ 38,858^[⁴^] [ 34,267 ³ 27,413 ⁴ 20,560 ⁵ ]
G02E	Philip Morris – Park 500	VA0026557	139,724	~~2,650~~ 1,060
G01E	Proctors Creek WWTP	VA0060194	411,151 ^[³^]	~~41,115~~ 16,448^[⁴^]
G01E	Richmond WWTP¹	VA0063177	1,096,402 ^[⁵^]	~~68,525~~ 27,413^[⁴^]
G02E	Dominion-Chesterfield²	VA0004146	~~272,036~~ 243,099	~~210~~ 170
J15R	South Central WW Authority	VA0025437	350,239 ^[ ³^]	~~35,024~~ 14,011^[⁴^]
~~G07R~~	~~Chickahominy WWTP~~	~~VA0088480~~	~~6,167~~	~~123~~
G05R	Tyson Foods – Glen Allen	VA0004031	19,552	[ ~~409~~ 424 ]
G11E	HRSD – Nansemond STP	VA0081299	~~750,000~~ ~~365,511³~~ 568,228^[³^] [ 365,511 ³ ]	~~91,367~~ ~~45,689³~~ ~~36,551⁴~~ ~~27,413⁵~~ ~~27,413⁵~~ 51,811^[⁴^] [ 45,689 ³ 36,551 ⁴ 27,413 ⁵ ]
G15E	HRSD – Army Base STP	VA0081230	~~610,000~~ ~~219,307³~~ 340,937^[³^] [ 219,307 ³ ]	~~54,820~~ ~~27,413³~~ ~~21,931⁴~~ ~~16,448⁵~~ 31,086^[⁴^] [ 27,413 ³ 21,931 ⁴ 16,448 ⁵ ]
G15E	HRSD – VIP WWTP	VA0081281	~~750,000~~ ~~487,348³~~ 757,638^[³^] [ 487,348 ³ ]	~~121,822~~ ~~60,919³~~ ~~48,735⁴~~ ~~36,551⁵~~ 69,081^[⁴^] [ 60,919 ³ 48,735 ⁴ 36,551 ⁵ ]
G15E	HRSD – JH Miles [ ~~MS4⁹~~ ]	~~VA0003263~~ [ VA0003263 ]	153,500	17,437
C07E	HRSD – Ches.-Elizabeth STP ^[¹⁰^]	VA0081264	~~1,100,000~~ ~~454,596^{6, 7}~~ [ 1,100,000 ] 454,583 ^{[ 6, 7 ]}	~~41,450⁷~~ 41,448 ^[ ^{7 ]}
G01E	~~Tranlin/Vastly~~ Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly Tranlin/Vastly	80,000	0
	TOTALS		~~14,901,739~~ ~~14,256,335⁶~~ ~~11,250,901³~~ [ ~~12,256,851~~ 12,949,784 ]	~~1,283,088~~ ~~1,046,325³~~ ~~998,960⁴~~ ~~951,596⁵~~ [ ~~753,932~~ 756, 978 ]
Notes: ¹Wasteload allocations for localities served by combined sewers are based on dry weather design flow capacity. During wet weather flow events the discharge shall achieve a TN concentration of 8.0 mg/l and a TP concentration of 1.0 mg/l. ²~~Wasteload allocations are "net" loads, based on the portion of the nutrient discharge introduced by the facility's process waste streams, and not originating in raw water intake.~~ Dominion-Chesterfield wasteload allocations shall be transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund on January 1, following the retirement of the last coal fired generating unit. 82,240 lbs/yr of TN WLA shall be held in reserve and may be made available by the department for an expansion of the Proctor's Creek WWTP provided that the expanded facility provides treatment to achieve an annual average TN concentration of 3.0 mg/l or less and the Falling Creek WWTP is designed to meet its individual TN WLA. ³~~Effective January 1, 2026.~~ [ Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Effective January 1, 2026 ] ⁴~~Effective January 1, 2030.~~ [ Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Effective January 1, 2030 ] ⁵~~Effective January 1, 2032.~~ [ Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 8.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Effective January 1, 2032 ] ⁶~~Effective January 1, 2022.~~ [ ~~The Moores Creek Advanced WRRF WLA includes 8,894 lbs/yr of total nitrogen and 1,112 lbs/yr of total phosphorus from the consolidation of the Camelot WWTP (VA0025488).~~ Effective January 1, 2022 ] ⁷~~Effective January 1, 2026, the HRSD – Chesapeake-Elizabeth STP wasteload allocations for total nitrogen and total phosphorus are transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund.~~ [ Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the value listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 12.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Effective January 1, 2026, the HRSD – Chesapeake-Elizabeth STP wasteload allocations for total nitrogen and total phosphorus are transferred to the Nutrient Offset Fund. ] [ ⁸Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the value listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.50 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ⁹The former J. H. Miles wasteload allocations acquired by HRSD in accordance with an agreement dated December 21, 2015 may be used to fulfill HRSD commitments to provide nutrient credits to municipal separate storm sewer systems only. ~~¹⁰Effective January 1, 2023, the total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations for the HRSD Chesapeake-Elizabeth STP transfer to the Nutrient Offset Fund.~~ ] [ ⁸The Moores Creek Advanced WRRF WLA includes 8,894 lbs/yr of total nitrogen and 1,112 lbs/yr of Total Phosphorus from the consolidation of the Camelot WWTP (VA0025488). ]

9VAC25-720-70 Rappahannock River Basin

A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).

TMDL #	Stream Name	TMDL Title	City/County	WBID	Pollutant	WLA¹	Units
1.	Broad Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Broad and Jackson Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
2.	Central Branch Carter Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
3.	Eastern Branch Carter Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
4.	Western Branch Carter Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Carter Creek	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
5.	Carter Run	Bacteria TMDL for Carter Run	Fauquier	E02	E. coli	1.12E+12	cfu/year
6.	Bells Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
7.	Eastern Branch Corrotoman River	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
8.	Ewells Prong	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
9.	Hills Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
10.	Millenbeck Prong	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
11.	Myer Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
12.	Senior Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
13.	Taylor Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
14.	Western Branch Corrotoman River	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination - Corrotoman River	Lancaster	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
15.	Deep Run	Bacteria TMDL for Deep Run	Fauquier	E10	E. coli	0	cfu/year
16.	Farnham Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Farnham Creek	Richmond	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
17.	Great Run	Bacteria TMDL for Great Run	Fauquier	E02	E. coli	4.35E+12	cfu/year
18.	Greenvale Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Towles Point to Deep Creek	Lancaster	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
19.	Rappahannock River, Beach Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Towles Point to Deep Creek	Lancaster	E25, E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
20.	Hoskins Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Hoskins Creek Watershed	Essex	E23	Enterococci	7.56E+09	cfu/day
21.	Lagrange Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lagrange and Robinson Creeks	Middlesex	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
22.	Robinson Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lagrange and Robinson Creeks	Middlesex	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
23.	Deep Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks	Lancaster	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
24.	Lancaster Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks	Lancaster, Richmond	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
25.	Mulberry Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Lancaster, Deep, and Mulberry Creeks	Lancaster	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
26.	Locklies Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Locklies and Mill Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
27.	Mill Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Locklies and Mill Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
28.	Mountain Run	Fecal Coliform TMDL Mountain Run Watershed	Culpeper	E09	Fecal coliform	1.36E+13	cfu/year
29.	Mine Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Mountain Run and Mine Run	Orange	E17	E. coli	1.25E+11	cfu/year
30.	Mountain Run	Bacteria TMDLs for Mountain Run and Mine Run	Orange	E17	E. coli	2.26E+11	cfu/year
31.	Muddy Run, lower	Bacteria TMDL for Muddy Run	Culpeper	E07	E. coli	2.09E+10	cfu/year
32.	Muddy Run, upper	Bacteria TMDL for Muddy Run	Culpeper	E07	E. coli	0	cfu/year
33.	Farmers Hall Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for Occupacia Creek and Farmers Hall Creek	Essex	E22	E. coli	7.58E+08	cfu/day
34.	Occupacia Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for Occupacia Creek and Farmers Hall Creek	Essex	E22	E. coli	6.27E+09	cfu/day
35.	Mosquito Creek	Oyster and Mosquito Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Lancaster	E26, C01	Fecal coliform	9.32E+08	MPN/day
36.	Oyster Creek	Oyster and Mosquito Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Contamination	Lancaster	E26, C01	Fecal coliform	1.36E+09	MPN/day
37.	Unnamed tributary to the Rapidan River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Orange	E13	E. coli	6.99E+09	cfu/year
38.	Marsh Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Orange	E13	E. coli	6.72E+10	cfu/year
39.	Blue Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Orange	E13	E. coli	8.75E+10	cfu/year
40.	Cedar Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Culpeper	E16	E. coli	1.82E+12	cfu/year
41.	Rapidan River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Orange, Culpeper, Greene, Madison	E11, E12, E13, E14, E15, E16, E17, E18	E. coli	1.98E+13	cfu/year
42.	Rapidan River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rapidan River Basin	Madison, Greene, Orange	E11, E12, E13	E. coli	3.26E+13	cfu/year
43.	Parrotts Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Mud and Parrotts Creeks	Middlesex	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
44.	Weeks (Mud) Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Rappahannock River: Mud and Parrotts Creeks	Middlesex	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
45.	Robinson River, upper	Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River	Madison	E14	E. coli	5.07E+09	cfu/year
46.	Robinson River, lower	Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River	Madison	E14, E15	E. coli	5.03E+10	cfu/year
47.	Little Dark Run	Bacteria TMDL for Robinson River	Madison	E15	E. coli	1.39E+11	cfu/year
48.	Rappahannock River, Bush Park Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Bush Park and Sturgeon Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
49.	Rappahannock River, Sturgeon Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Bush Park and Sturgeon Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
50.	Thumb Run	Fecal Coliform TMDL Development for Thumb Run	Fauquier	E01	Fecal coliform	0	cfu/year
51.	Rappahannock River, tidal fresh	Bacteria TMDL for the Tidal Freshwater Rappahannock River Watershed	Caroline, King George, Fredericksburg, Spotsylvania, Stafford	E19, E20, E21	E. coli	1.14E+14	cfu/year
52.	Totuskey Creek	Totuskey and Richardson Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Richmond	E24	Enterococci	6.40E+08	cfu/day
53.	Totuskey Creek, Richardson Creek, Rappahannock River	Totuskey and Richardson Creeks Total Maximum Daily Load Report for Shellfish Condemnation Areas Listed Due to Bacteria Pollution	Richmond	E24	Fecal coliform	2.29E+09	MPN/day
54.	Hughes River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Madison	E03	E. coli	8.44E+09	cfu/year
55.	Craig Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Fauquier	E08	E. coli	2.72E+10	cfu/year
56.	Browns Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Fauquier	E08	E. coli	3.38E+10	cfu/year
57.	Rappahannock River (1) - VAN-E01R-03	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Rappahannock	E01	E. coli	1.79E+11	cfu/year
58.	Rush River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Rappahannock	E05	E. coli	5.22E+11	cfu/year
59.	Hazel River (2) - 60076	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock	E03, E04, E05, E06, E07	E. coli	7.48E+11	cfu/year
60.	Marsh Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Fauquier	E08	E. coli	8.76E+11	cfu/year
61.	Hazel River (1) - VAN-E04R-01	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock	E03, E04	E. coli	3.92E+12	cfu/year
62.	Rappahannock River (2) - VAN-E08R-04	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock, Fauquier	E01, E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07, E08	E. coli	1.85E+13	cfu/year
63.	Rappahannock River (3) - 60081	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Rappahannock River Basin	Madison, Culpeper, Rappahannock, Fauquier	E01, E02, E03, E04, E05, E06, E07, E08	E. coli	2.18E+13	cfu/year
64.	Rappahannock River, Mark Haven Beach	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina	Essex	E25	Fecal coliform	6.72E+08	counts/day
65.	Rappahannock River, Garrett's Marina	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina	Essex	E24	Fecal coliform	1.94E+09	counts/day
66.	Upper Rappahannock River	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina	Westmoreland, Essex, Richmond	E22, E23, E24	Fecal coliform	7.08E+10	counts/day
67.	Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina	Richmond	E23	Fecal coliform	1.01E+10	counts/day
68.	Piscataway Creek	Shellfish Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Upper Rappahannock Tidal River, Unsegmented Estuaries in E23, Little Carter Creek, Jugs Creek, Piscataway Creek, Mark Haven Beach and Garrett's Marina	Essex	E23	Fecal coliform	4.92E+10	counts/day
69.	Urbanna Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Urbanna Creek	Middlesex	E25	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
70.	Meachim Creek (179A)	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
71.	Meachim Creek (179B)	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
72.	Rappahannock River: Whiting Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Whiting and Meachim Creeks	Middlesex	E26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
73.	Mill Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Caroline	E21R	E. coli	1.19E+12	cfu/year
74.	Jetts Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	King George	E21R	E. coli	6.41E+10	cfu/year
75.	Portobago Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Caroline	E21R	E. coli	1.06E+11	cfu/year
76.	Stillwater Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Essex	E22R	E. coli	3.50E+10	cfu/year
77.	Baylors Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Essex	E22R	E. coli	4.72E+10	cfu/year
78.	Elmwood Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Essex	E22R	E. coli	5.14E+10	cfu/year
79.	Peedee Creek, non-tidal	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Westmoreland	E22R	E. coli	2.62E+10	cfu/year
80.	Unnamed tributary of Peedee Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Westmoreland	E22R	E. coli	1.30E+9	cfu/year
81.	Peedee Creek, tidal	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Westmoreland	E22E	Enterococci	2.07E+10	cfu/day
82.	Rappahannock River, tidal	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Rappahannock River and Tributaries Located in Caroline, Essex, King George, Richmond, and Westmoreland Counties Virginia	Richmond County, Essex	E22E	Enterococci	3.11E+12	cfu/day
Notes: ¹The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that the Department of Environmental Quality tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria. ²There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area.

B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.

9VAC25-720-70 Rappahannock Area Development Commission (RADCO) 208 Area Wide Waste Treatment Management Plan and Potomac-Shenandoah River Basin 303(e) Water Quality Management Plan is included in The Potomac River Basin section.

C. Nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations to restore the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal rivers.

Virginia Waterbody ID	Discharger Name	VPDES Permit No.	Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)	Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)
E09R	Culpeper WWTP	VA0061590	73,093 ^[¹^]	5,483 ^[²^]
E02R	Marshall WWTP	VA0031763	7,797	585
E13R	Orange STP	VA0021385	36,547	2,741
E11R	Rapidan ~~STP~~ WWTP	VA0090948	7,309	548
E02R	~~Fauquier County Water & Sewer Authority-~~ Remington WWTP	VA0076805	24,364	1,827
E02R	Clevengers Village WWTP	VA0080527	10,964	822
E02R	Warrenton Town STP	VA0021172	30,456	2,284
E18R	Wilderness WWTP	VA0083411	15,228	1,142
E20E	FMC WWTF	VA0068110	48,737 ^[¹^]	3,655 ^[²^]
E20E	Fredericksburg WWTF	VA0025127	54,820 ^[¹^]	4,112 ^[²^]
E21E	Haymount WWTF	VA0089125	7,066	530
E24E	Haynesville CC WWTP	VA0023469	2,802	210
E21E	KGCSA - Hopyard ~~Farms STP~~ Farm [ ~~WWTP~~ WWTF ]	VA0089338	6,091	457
E20E	Little Falls Run WWTF	VA0076392	97,458 ^[¹^]	7,309 ^[²^]
E20E	Massaponax WWTF	VA0025658	114,505 ^[¹^]	[ ~~8,405 ²~~ 8,588 ]
E23R	Montross Westmoreland WWTP	VA0072729	1,584	119
E21E	KGCSA - Oakland Park STP	VA0086789	1,706	128
E23E	Tappahannock WWTP	VA0071471	9,746	731
E26E	HRSD - Urbanna ~~WWTP~~ STP	VA0026263	1,218	91
E21R	US Army - Ft. A P Hill WWTP	VA0032034	6,457	484
E23E	Warsaw ~~Aerated Lagoons~~ WWTP	VA0026891	3,655	274
C01E	Omega Protein - Reedville	VA0003867	21,213	1,591
C01E	Reedville Sanitary District	VA0060712	2,436	183
C01E	Kilmarnock ~~WTP~~ WWTP	VA0020788	6,091	457
	~~Unallocated Reserve WLA~~ Nutrient Offset Fund		22,904	1,900
	TOTALS:		~~614,245~~ 614,247	[ ~~46,068~~ 46,251 ]
[ ¹Effective January 1, 2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TN WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ²Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ]

9VAC25-720-120 York River Basin

A. Total maximum daily loads (TMDLs).

TMDL #	Stream Name	TMDL Title	City/County	WBID	Pollutant	WLA¹	Units
1.	Lower Pamunkey River	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F13R, F13E, F14R, F14E	E. coli	5.38E+13	cfu/yr
2.	Middle Pamunkey River	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F12R	E. coli	2.36E+13	cfu/yr
3.	Taylors Creek (VAN-F03R-01)	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F03R	E. coli	3.66E+10	cfu/yr
4.	Northeast Creek	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F09R	E. coli	2.34E+12	cfu/yr
5.	Totopotomoy Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin	Hanover	F13	E. coli	2.62E+10	cfu/year
6.	Newfound River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Pamunkey River Basin	Hanover	F05	E. coli	2.89E+10	cfu/year
7.	South Anna River (VAN-F02R-01)	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent	F01R, F02R	E. coli	7.50E+12	cfu/yr
8.	South Anna River (VAN-F01R-01)	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent	F01R	E. coli	4.92E+12	cfu/yr
9.	South Anna River (VAP-F04R-01)	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent	F03R, F04R	E. coli	7.74E+12	cfu/yr
10.	South Anna River (VAP-F04R-02)	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, and New Kent	F04R	E. coli	6.02E+12	cfu/yr
11.	Adams Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek	Gloucester	F26	Fecal coliform	4.48E+08	MPN/day
12.	Poropotank River and Morris Bay	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Poropotank River and Adams Creek	Gloucester	F26	Fecal coliform	4.78E+09	MPN/day
13.	Felgates Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds	York	F27	Fecal coliform	3.70E+10	MPN/day
14.	King Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds	York	F27	Fecal coliform	4.37E+10	MPN/day
15.	Queen Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Queen Creek, King Creek, and Felgates Creek Watersheds	York, Williamsburg	F26	Fecal coliform	9.69E+11	MPN/day
16.	Perrin River, upper	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River	Gloucester	F27	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
17.	Sarah Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - Sarah Creek and Perrin River	Gloucester	F27	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
18.	Plentiful Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Spotsylvania	F07	E. coli	3.57E+09	cfu/year
19.	Mountain Run	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Orange	F06	E. coli	1.22E+10	cfu/year
20.	Beaver Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Orange	F06	E. coli	1.25E+10	cfu/year
21.	Terrys Run	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Orange	F07	E. coli	1.86E+10	cfu/year
22.	Pamunkey Creek and Tomahawk Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Orange	F07	E. coli	9.05E+10	cfu/year
23.	Goldmine Creek	Bacteria TMDLs for York River Basin	Louisa	F06	E. coli	1.09E+11	cfu/year
24.	Lower Pamunkey River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds	New Kent, King William	F14	Enterococci	1.34E+10	cfu/day
25.	Lower Mattaponi River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds	King and Queen, King William	F24, F25	Enterococci	1.42E+10	cfu/day
26.	Upper York River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds	New Kent, King William, King and Queen	F14, F24, F25, F26	Enterococci	2.76E+10	cfu/day
27.	Upper York River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load Development for the Upper York River, the Lower Pamunkey River, and the Lower Mattaponi River (Tidal) Watersheds	New Kent, King William, King and Queen	F14, F24, F25, F26	Fecal coliform	1.14E+12	counts/day
28.	Taskinas Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments	James City	F26	Fecal coliform	4.97E+08	MPN/day
29.	Skimino Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments	James City	F26	Fecal coliform	1.34E+09	MPN/day
30.	Ware Creek	TMDL Report for Chesapeake Bay Shellfish Waters: Ware Creek, Taskinas Creek, and Skimino Creek Bacterial Impairments	James City	F26	Fecal coliform	1.36E+09	MPN/day
31.	Aberdeen Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek	Gloucester	F26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
32.	Carter Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek	Gloucester	F27	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
33.	Cedarbush Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek	Gloucester	F27	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
34.	Jones Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek	Gloucester	F26	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
35.	Timberneck Creek	Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report for Shellfish Areas Listed Due to Bacterial Contamination - York River: Gloucester Point to Jones Creek	Gloucester	F27	Fecal coliform	N/A²	MPN/day
36.	Upper Little River	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F11R, F10R	E. coli	5.61E+12	cfu/yr
37.	Upper Pamunkey River and North Anna River	E. coli TMDL Development for The Pamunkey River and Tributaries, VA	Hanover, Louisa, King William, Caroline, Spotsylvania, New Kent	F12R, F09R	E. coli	3.25E+13	cfu/yr
38.	Brock Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Spotsylvania	F15	E. coli	3.09E+10	cfu/yr
39.	Chapel Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	King and Queen	F21	E. coli	1.25E+12	cfu/yr
40.	Doctors Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F22	E. coli	3.24E+11	cfu/yr
41.	Glady Run	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Spotsylvania	F16	E. coli	1.85E+11	cfu/yr
42.	Maracossic Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline, King and Queen	F22	E. coli	5.24E+12	cfu/yr
43.	Mat River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Spotsylvania	F18	E. coli	1.94E+11	cfu/yr
44.	Matta River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Spotsylvania, Caroline	F18	E. coli	2.14E+12	cfu/yr
45.	Mattaponi River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F17	E. coli	6.16E+12	cfu/yr
46.	Motto River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F19	E. coli	6.48E+10	cfu/yr
47.	Po River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Spotsylvania, Caroline	F16	E. coli	1.46E+12	cfu/yr
48.	Polecat Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F20	E. coli	1.56E+11	cfu/yr
49.	Poni River	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F17	E. coli	2.93E+12	cfu/yr
50.	Reedy Creek	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	Caroline	F21	E. coli	2.08E+11	cfu/yr
51.	Root Swamp	Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Development for the Mattaponi River Watershed	King and Queen	F22	E. coli	5.15E+11	cfu/yr
Notes: ¹The total WLA can be increased prior to modification provided that DEQ tracks these changes for bacteria TMDLs where the permit is consistent with water quality standards for bacteria. ²There were no point source dischargers in the modeled TMDL area.

B. Stream segment classifications, effluent limitations including water quality based effluent limitations, and wasteload allocations.

TABLE B1 -- RECOMMENDED STREAM SEGMENTS IN THE YORK RIVER BASIN
Segment Number	Classification	Name of River (Description)*
8–1	E.L.	North Anna River (main and tributaries except Goldmine Creek and Contrary Creek) R.M. 68.4–0.0
8–2	E.L.	Goldmine Creek
8–3	W.Q.	Contrary Creek (main only) R.M. 9.5–0.0
8–4	E.L.	South Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M. 101.2–97.1
8–5	E.L.	South Anna River (main only) R.M. 97.1–77.4
8–6	E.L.	South Anna River (main and tributaries) R.M.77.4–0.0
8–7	E.L.	Pamunkey River (main and tributaries) R.M. 90.7–12.2
8–8	W.Q.	Pamunkey River (main only) R.M. 12.2–0.0
8–9	E.L.	Mattaponi River (main and tributaries) R.M.102.2–10.2
8–10	E.L.	Mattaponi River (main only) R.M.10.2–0.0
8–11	W.Q.	York River (main only) R.M. 30.4–22.4
8–12	E.L.	York River (main and tributaries except King Creek and Carter Creek) R.M. 22.4–0.0
8–13	E.L.	Carter Creek (main and tributaries) R.M. 5.4–2.0
8–14	E.L.	Carter Creek (main only) R.M. 2.0–0.0
8–15	E.L.	King Creek (main only) R.M. 5.6–0.0
8–16	W.Q.	Condemned shellfish areas- Timberneck, Queens, and Sarah Creeks and portions of the main stream of the York River.
Notes: *R.M.= River Mile, measured from the river mouth Source: Roy F. Western

TABLE B2 -- WASTELOAD ALLOCATIONS (IN LBS PER DAY)
POINT SOURCE	1977 WASTELOAD²		MAXIMUM⁷ DAILY LOAD		RECOMMENDED ALLOCATION			RAW WASTELOAD AT 1995		REQUIRED & REMOVAL EFFICIENCY 1995
POINT SOURCE	CBOD₅	UBOD¹	CBOD₅	UBOD	CBOD₅	UBOD	PERCENT RESERVE	CBOD₅	UBOD	CBOD₅	UBOD
Gordonsville	145	398	150	412	150	412	0	1950	2730	92	85
Louisa-Mineral	50	108	55	118	55	118	0	850	1150	93	90
Doswell	52	110	862⁸	1407⁸	690⁸	1125⁸	20	1080	1444	85⁴	71
Thornburg	63	150	68	162	68	162	0	1240	1690	94	90
Bowling Green	27	64	29	68	29	68	0	680	926	96	93
Ashland	160	303	235	559	188	447	20	2250	3825	92	88
Hanover (Regional STP)	170	437	280	820	280	820	0	5730	7930	96	90
Chesapeake Corp.	6400	8000	10445⁵	15000⁵	10445⁵	15000⁵	N/A	51700	64630	90	90
West Point	105	380	281³	1020	225	814	20	1000	1600	85⁴	66
Notes: ¹BOD is Ultimate Biochemical Oxygen Demand. Its concentration is derived by the following: BOD₅/0.80+ 4.5(TKN)=(UBOD). NOTE: The amount of TKN utilized depends on the location in the basin. ²Projected for 1977 based on population projections. ³Recommended allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines applied to raw wasteloads at 2020. ⁴Minimum removal efficiency. ⁵Allocation based on BPCTCA effluent guidelines; amended by Minute 25, June 3-5, 1979 board meeting. ⁷Assimilative capacity. ⁸Amended by Minute 1, August 17, 1978, board meeting. Source: Roy F. Weston, Inc.

Virginia Waterbody ID	Discharger Name	VPDES Permit No.	Total Nitrogen (TN) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)	Total Phosphorus (TP) Wasteload Allocation (lbs/yr)
F20R	Caroline County ~~STP~~ Regional WWTP	VA0073504	9,137	609
F01R	Gordonsville STP	VA0021105	17,177	1,145
F04R	Ashland WWTP	VA0024899	36,547	2,436
F09R	Doswell WWTP	VA0029521	18,273	1,218
F09R	~~Bear Island Paper Company~~ 819 Virginia LLC	VA0029521	47,328	10,233
F27E	~~Plains Marketing L.P. - Yorktown~~ Nutrient Offset Fund	Formerly VA0003018	167,128	17,689
F27E	HRSD - York River STP	VA0081311	275,927^{[ 1 ]} ~~228,444¹~~ [ 228,444 ¹ ]	18,395^{[ 2 ]}
F14R	Parham Landing WWTP	VA0088331	36,547	2,436
F14E	~~RockTenn~~ WestRock CP LLC - West Point	VA0003115	259,177	56,038
F12E	Totopotomoy WWTP	VA0089915	182,734 ^[¹^]	12,182 ^[²^]
F25E	HRSD - West Point STP	VA0075434	10,964	731
	TOTALS:		1,060,939 ~~1,013,456¹~~	123,112
[ ~~Notes:~~ ] ¹Effective January 1, ~~2026.~~ [ ~~2026, the total nitrogen wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows:~~ 2026. ] [ ~~TNWLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 4.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ²Effective January 1, 2026, the total phosphorus wasteload allocation for any given calendar year is the lesser of (i) the values listed in this table and (ii) the floating wasteload allocation calculated as follows: ~~TP WLA (lbs/yr) = Annual average treated flow (MGD) x 0.30 mg/l x 8.345 x 365~~ Annual average treated flow is the sum of 12 monthly average treated flows divided by 12. Floating wasteload allocations shall be calculated to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. ]

9VAC25-820-40 Compliance plans

A. By [ ~~July~~ ~~1, 2022~~, February 1, 2023 ] every owner of a facility subject to reduced individual total nitrogen or total phosphorous wasteload allocations as identified in 9VAC25-820-80 shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit compliance plans to the department for approval.

1. [ For facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 A, compliance with reduced wasteload allocations established by the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Certainty Program shall be on the effective date of the reduced allocations as established in 9VAC25-720-60 and 9VAC25-720-120. For facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 B, compliance with chlorophyll-a based total phosphorus wasteload allocations shall be achieved as soon as possible, but no later than January 1, 2026. ] The compliance plans shall contain any capital projects and implementation schedules needed to achieve total nitrogen and phosphorus reductions sufficient to comply with the individual and combined wasteload allocations of all the permittees in the tributary [ ~~as soon as possible~~ ] . Permittees submitting individual plans are not required to account for other facilities' activities.

2. As part of the compliance plan development [ for facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 B ] , permittees shall either:

a. Demonstrate that the additional capital projects anticipated by subdivision 1 of this subsection are necessary to ensure continued compliance with these allocations by January 1, 2026, or

b. Request that their individual wasteload allocations become effective on January 1, [ ~~2022~~ 2023 ] .

3. The compliance plans may rely on the exchange of point source credits in accordance with this general permit, but not the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund (§ 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia), to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary.

B. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit annual compliance plan updates to the department for approval as required by Part I D of the general permit.

9VAC25-820-70 General permit

Any owner whose registration statement is accepted by the board will receive the following general permit and shall comply with the requirements of the general permit.

General Permit No.: VAN000000
Effective Date: January 1, 2022

Expiration Date: December 31, 2026

GENERAL PERMIT FOR TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGES AND NUTRIENT TRADING IN THE CHESAPEAKE WATERSHED IN VIRGINIA
AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW

In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended, and pursuant to the State Water Control Law and regulations adopted pursuant to it, owners of facilities holding a VPDES individual permit or owners of facilities that otherwise meet the definition of an existing facility, with total nitrogen or total phosphorus discharges, or both to the Chesapeake Bay or its tributaries, are authorized to discharge to surface waters and exchange credits for total nitrogen or total phosphorus, or both.

The authorized discharge shall be in accordance with the registration statement filed with DEQ, this cover page, Part I-Special Conditions Applicable to All Facilities, Part II-Special Conditions Applicable to New and Expanded Facilities, and Part III-Conditions Applicable to All VPDES Permits, as set forth herein.

[ ~~Part I~~

~~SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL FACILITIES~~

~~Any owner whose registration statement is accepted by the board will receive the following general permit and shall comply with the requirements of the general permit.~~

~~General Permit No.: VAN000000~~
~~Effective Date: January 1, 2022~~

~~Expiration Date: December 31, 2026~~

~~GENERAL PERMIT FOR TOTAL NITROGEN AND TOTAL PHOSPHORUS DISCHARGES AND NUTRIENT TRADING IN THE CHESAPEAKE WATERSHED IN VIRGINIA~~
~~AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE VIRGINIA POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AND THE VIRGINIA STATE WATER CONTROL LAW~~

PART I

SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL FACILITIES

A. Authorized activities.

1. Authorization to discharge for owners of facilities required to register.

a. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement to the department by November 1, 2021, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit, shall be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus subject to the requirements of this general permit upon the department's approval of the registration statement.

b. Any owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement with the department at the time he makes application with the department for a new discharge or expansion that is subject to an offset or technology-based requirement in Part II of this general permit, shall be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus subject to the requirements of this general permit upon the department's approval of the registration statement.

c. Upon the department's approval of the registration statement, a facility will be included in the registration list maintained by the department.

2. Authorization to discharge for owners of facilities not required to register. Any owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit and not required by this general permit to submit a registration statement shall be deemed to be authorized to discharge total nitrogen and total phosphorus under this general permit at the time it is issued. Owners of facilities that are deemed to be permitted under this subsection shall have no obligation under this general permit prior to submitting a registration statement and securing coverage under this general permit based upon such registration statement.

3. Continuation of permit coverage.

a. Any owner authorized to discharge under this general permit and who submits a complete registration statement for the reissued general permit by November 1, 2026, in accordance with Part III M or who is not required to register in accordance with Part I A 2 is authorized to continue to discharge under the terms of this general permit until such time as the board either:

(1) Issues coverage to the owner under the reissued general permit, or

(2) Notifies the owner that the discharge is not eligible for coverage under this general permit.

b. When the owner that was covered under the expiring or expired general permit has violated or is violating the conditions of that permit, the board may choose to do any or all of the following:

(1) Initiate enforcement action based upon the 2017 general permit,

(2) Issue a notice of intent to deny coverage under the reissued general permit. If the general permit coverage is denied, the owner would then be required to cease the discharges authorized by the administratively continued coverage under the terms of the 2017 general permit or be subject to enforcement action for operating without a permit, or

(3) Take other actions authorized by the State Water Control Law.

B. Wasteload allocations.

1. Wasteload allocations allocated to permitted facilities pursuant to 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, or applicable TMDLs, or wasteload allocations acquired by owners of new and expanding facilities to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion under Part II B of this general permit, and existing loads calculated from the permitted design capacity of expanding facilities not previously covered by this general permit, shall be incorporated into the registration list maintained by the department. The wasteload allocations contained in this list shall be enforceable as annual mass load limits in this general permit. Credits shall not be generated by facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005.

2. Except as described in subdivisions 2 c and 2 d of this subsection, an owner of two or more facilities covered by this general permit and discharging to the same tributary may apply for and receive an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total nitrogen and an aggregated mass load limit for delivered total phosphorus reflecting the total of the water quality-based total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations or permitted design capacities established for such facilities individually.

a. The permittee (and all of the individual facilities covered under a single registration) shall be deemed to be in compliance when the aggregate mass load discharged by the facilities is less than the aggregate load limit.

b. The permittee will be eligible to generate credits only if the aggregate mass load discharged by the facilities is less than the total of the wasteload allocations assigned to any of the affected facilities.

c. The aggregation of mass load limits shall not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations.

d. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, cannot be aggregated with other facilities under common ownership or operation.

e. Operation under an aggregated mass load limit in accordance with this section shall not be deemed credit acquisition as described in Part I J 2 of this general permit.

3. An owner that consolidates two or more facilities discharging to the same tributary into a single regional facility may apply for and receive an aggregated mass load limit for total nitrogen and an aggregated mass load limit for total phosphorus, subject to the following conditions:

a. Aggregate mass limits will be calculated accounting for delivery factors in effect at the time of the consolidation.

b. If all of the affected facilities have wasteload allocations in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding the wasteload allocations of the affected facilities. The regional facility shall be eligible to generate credits.

c. If any, but not all, of the affected facilities has a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding:

(1) Wasteload allocations of those facilities that have wasteload allocations in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation;

(2) Permitted design capacities assigned to affected industrial facilities; and

(3) Loads from affected sewage treatment works that do not have a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, defined as the lesser of a previously calculated permitted design capacity, or the values calculated by the following formulae:

Nitrogen Load (lbs/ year) = flow (MGD) x 8.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 days/year

Phosphorus Load (lbs/ year) = flow (MGD) x 1.0 mg/l x 8.345 x 365 days/year

Flows used in the preceding formulae shall be the design flow of the treatment works from which the affected facility currently discharges.

The regional facility shall be eligible to generate credits.

d. If none of the affected facilities have a wasteload allocation in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation, the aggregate mass load limit shall be calculated by adding the respective permitted design capacities for the affected facilities.

e. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a Virginia Pollution Abatement (VPA) permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, may be consolidated with other facilities under common ownership or operation, but their allocations cannot be transferred to the regional facility.

f. Facilities whose operations were previously authorized by a VPA permit that was issued before July 1, 2005, can become regional facilities, but they cannot receive additional allocations beyond those permitted in Part II B 1 d of this general permit.

4. Unless otherwise noted, the nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations assigned to permitted facilities are considered total loads, including nutrients present in the intake water from the river, as applicable. On a case-by-case basis, an industrial discharger may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that a portion of the nutrient load originates in its intake water. This demonstration shall be consistent with the assumptions and methods used to derive the allocations through the Chesapeake Bay models. In these cases, the board may limit the permitted discharge to the net nutrient load portion of the assigned wasteload allocation.

5. Bioavailability. Unless otherwise noted, the entire nitrogen and phosphorus wasteload allocations assigned to permitted facilities are considered to be bioavailable to organisms in the receiving stream. On a case-by-case basis, a discharger may demonstrate to the satisfaction of the board that a portion of the nutrient load is not bioavailable; this demonstration shall not be based on the ability of the nutrient to resist degradation at the wastewater treatment plant, but instead, on the ability of the nutrient to resist degradation within a natural environment for the amount of time that it is expected to remain in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. This demonstration shall also be consistent with the assumptions and methods used to derive the allocations through the Chesapeake Bay models. In these cases, the board may limit the permitted discharge to the bioavailable portion of the assigned wasteload allocation.

C. Schedule of compliance. ~~The significant dischargers in the James River Basin shall meet aggregate discharged wasteload allocations of 8,968,864 lbs/yr TN and 545,558 lbs/yr TP by January 1, 2023.~~

1. [ For facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 A, compliance with reduced wasteload allocations established by the Enhanced Nutrient Removal Certainty Program shall be on the effective date of the reduced allocations as established in 9VAC25-720-60 and 9VAC25-720-120. ] For facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 [ B ], compliance with chlorophyll-a based total phosphorus wasteload allocations shall be achieved as soon as possible but no later than January 1, 2026. [ ~~Compliance with floating wasteload allocations shall be no later than the January 1, 2026, effective date of the allocations.~~ ]

2. Following submission of compliance plans and compliance plan updates required by 9VAC25-820-40, the board shall reevaluate the schedule of compliance in subdivision 1 [ a ] of this subsection, taking into account the information in the compliance plans and the factors in § 62.1-44.19:14 C 2 of the Code of Virginia. When warranted based on such information and factors, the board shall adjust the schedule in subdivision 1 of this subsection as appropriate by modification or reissuance of this general permit.

3. The registration list shall contain individual dates for compliance with wasteload allocations for dischargers, as follows:

a. Owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 [ B ] will have individual dates for compliance based on their respective compliance plans that may be earlier than the schedule listed in subdivision 1 of this subsection.

b. Owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 [ B ] that waive their compliance schedules in accordance with 9VAC25-820-40 A 2 b shall have an individual compliance date of January 1, [ ~~2022~~ 2023 ] .

c. Upon completion of the projects contained in their compliance plans, owners of facilities listed in 9VAC25-820-80 [ B ] may receive a revised individual compliance date of January 1 for the calendar year immediately following the year in which a Certificate to Operate was issued for the capital projects, but not later than January 1, 2026.

d. Owners of new and expanded facilities will have individual dates for compliance corresponding to the date that coverage under this general permit was extended to discharges from the facility.

D. Annual update of compliance plan. Every owner of a facility required to submit a registration statement shall either individually or through the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association submit updated compliance plans to the department no later than February 1 of each year. The compliance plans shall contain sufficient information to document a plan to achieve and maintain compliance with applicable total nitrogen and total phosphorus individual wasteload allocations on the registration list and aggregate wasteload allocations in Part I C 3. Compliance plans for owners of facilities that were required to submit a registration statement with the department under Part I G 1 a may rely on the acquisition of point source credits in accordance with Part I J of this general ~~permit, but not the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund,~~ permit to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary. Annual compliance plan updates for facilities subject to reduced wasteload allocations and listed in 9VAC25-820-80 shall not rely on the acquisition of credits through payments into the Nutrient Offset Fund. Compliance plans for expansions or new discharges for owners of facilities that are required to submit a registration statement with the department under Part I G 1 b and c may rely on the acquisition of allocation in accordance with Part II B of this general permit to achieve compliance with the individual and combined wasteload allocations in each tributary.

E. Monitoring requirements.

1. Discharges shall be monitored by the permittee during weekdays as specified in the table below unless the department determines that weekday only sampling results in a non-representative load. Weekend monitoring or alternative monthly load calculations to address production schedules or seasonal flows shall be submitted to the department for review and approval on a case-by-case basis. Facilities that exhibit instantaneous discharge flows that vary from the daily average discharge flow by less than 10% may submit a proposal to the department to use an alternative sample type; such proposals shall be reviewed and approved by the department on a case-by-case basis.

Parameter	Sample Type and Collection Frequency
STP design flow	≥20.0 MGD	1.0 - 19.999 MGD	0.5 - 0.999 MGD	0.040 - 0.499 MGD	< 0.040 MGD
Effluent TN load limit for industrial facilities		≥100,000 lb/yr	50,000 - 99,999 lb/yr	487 - 49,999 lb/yr	< 487 lb/yr
Effluent TP load limit for industrial facilities		≥10,000 lb/yr	5,000 - 9,999 lb/yr	37 - 4,999 lb/yr	< 37 lb/yr
Flow	Totalizing, Indicating, and Recording				1/Day, see individual VPDES permit for sample type
Nitrogen Compounds (Total Nitrogen = TKN + NO₂- (as N) + NO₃- (as N))	24 HC 3 Days/Week	24 HC 2 Days/Week*	8 HC 2 Days/Week*	8 HC 2/Month, > 7 days apart	1/Month Grab
Total Phosphorus	24 HC 3 Days/Week	24 HC 2 Days/Week*	8 HC 2 Days/Week*	8 HC 2/Month, > 7 days apart	1/Month Grab
*Two flow composited samples taken in the same calendar week that are then composited by flow into a single weekly composite sample for analysis shall be considered to be in compliance with this requirement.

2. Monitoring for compliance with effluent limitations shall be performed in a manner identical to that used to determine compliance with effluent limitations established in the individual VPDES permit unless specified otherwise in subdivisions 3, 4, and 5 of Part I E. Monitoring or sampling shall be conducted according to analytical laboratory methods approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test or sample collection procedures have been requested by the permittee and approved by the department in writing. All analysis for compliance with effluent limitations shall be conducted in accordance with 1VAC30-45, Certification for Noncommercial Environmental Laboratories, or 1VAC30-46, Accreditation for Commercial Environmental Laboratories. Monitoring may be performed by the permittee at frequencies more stringent than listed in subdivision 1 of Part I E; however, the permittee shall report all results of such monitoring.

3. Loading values greater than or equal to 10 pounds reported in accordance with Part I E and F of this general permit shall be calculated and reported to the nearest pound without regard to mathematical rules of precision. Loading values of less than 10 pounds reported in accordance with Part I E and F of this general permit shall be calculated and reported to at least two significant digits with the exception that all complete calendar year annual loads shall be reported to the nearest pound.

4. Data shall be reported on a form provided by the department, by the same date each month as is required by the owner's individual VPDES permit. The total monthly load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

where:

ML = total monthly load (lb/mo) = average daily load for the calendar month multiplied by the number of days of the calendar month on which a discharge occurred

DL = daily load = daily concentration (expressed as mg/l to the nearest 0.01 mg/l) multiplied by the flow volume of effluent discharged during the 24-hour period (expressed as MGD to at least the nearest 0.01 MGD and in no case less than two significant digits), multiplied by 8.345. Daily loads greater than or equal to 10 pounds may be rounded to the nearest whole number to convert to pounds per day (lbs/day). Daily loads less than or equal to 10 pounds may be rounded to no fewer than two significant figures.

s = number of days in the calendar month in which a sample was collected and analyzed

d = number of discharge days in the calendar month

For total phosphorus, all daily concentration data below the quantification level (QL) for the analytical method used shall be treated as half the QL. All daily concentration data equal to or above the QL for the analytical method used shall be treated as it is reported. If all data are below the QL, then the average shall be reported as half the QL.

For total nitrogen (TN), if none of the daily concentration data for the respective species (i.e., TKN, nitrates/nitrites) are equal to or above the QL for the respective analytical methods used, the daily TN concentration value reported shall equal one half of the largest QL used for the respective species. If one of the data is equal to or above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall be treated as that data point as reported. If more than one of the data is above the QL, the daily TN concentration value shall equal the sum of the data points as reported.

The quantification levels shall be less than or equal to the following concentrations:

Parameter	Quantification Level
TKN	0.50 mg/l
Nitrite	0.10 mg/l
Nitrate	0.20 mg/l
Nitrite + Nitrate	0.20 mg/l

Higher QLs may be approved on a case-by-case basis where a higher QL routinely results in reportable results of the species in question or is otherwise technically appropriate based on standard lab practices.

The total year-to-date mass load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

where:

AL-YTD = calendar year-to-date annual load (lb/yr)

ML = total monthly load (lb/mo)

The total annual mass load shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:

where:

AL = calendar year annual load (lb/yr)

ML = total monthly load (lb/mo)

5. The department may authorize a chemical usage evaluation as an alternative means of determining nutrient loading for outfalls where the only source of nutrients is that found in the surface water intake and chemical additives used by the facility. Such an evaluation shall be submitted to the department for review and approval on a case-by-case basis. Implementation of approved chemical usage evaluations shall satisfy the requirements specified under Part I E 1 and 2.

[ 6. Facilities with approved reclamation and reuse programs that choose to base their floating wasteload allocations on treated flow shall measure and report the total annual flow discharged to the reuse distribution system. ]

F. Annual reporting. On or before February 1, annually, each permittee shall file a discharge monitoring report with the department identifying the annual mass load of total nitrogen and the annual mass load of total phosphorus discharged by the permitted facility during the previous calendar year.

G. Requirement to register; exclusions.

1. The following owners are required to register for coverage under this general permit:

a. Every owner of an existing facility authorized by a VPDES permit to discharge 100,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment work, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into tidal waters, or 500,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment works, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into nontidal waters shall submit a registration statement to the department by November 1, 2016, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M. The conditions of this general permit will apply to such owner upon approval of a registration statement.

b. Any owner of a facility authorized by a Virginia Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day from a sewage treatment works, or an equivalent load from an industrial facility, directly into tidal or nontidal waters shall submit a registration statement with the department at the time he makes application for an individual permit with the department for a new discharge or expansion that is subject to an offset requirement in Part II of this general permit or to a technology-based requirement in 9VAC25-40-70, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M. The conditions of this general permit will apply to such owner beginning January 1 of the calendar year immediately following approval of a registration statement and issuance or modification of the individual permit.

c. Any owner of a facility treating domestic sewage authorized by a VPDES permit with a discharge greater than 1,000 gallons per day up to and including 39,999 gallons per day that did not commence the discharge of pollutants prior to January 1, 2011, and is subject to offset requirements in accordance with Part II A 1 c of this general permit shall submit a registration statement with the department at the time the owner makes application for an individual permit with the department or prior to commencing a discharge, whichever occurs first, and thereafter upon the reissuance of this general permit in accordance with Part III M.

2. All other categories of discharges are excluded from registration under this general permit.

H. Registration statement.

1. The registration statement shall contain the following information:

a. Name, mailing address and telephone number, email address, and fax number of the owner (and facility operator, if different from the owner) applying for permit coverage;

b. Name (or other identifier), address, city or county, contact name, phone number, email address, and fax number for the facility for which the registration statement is submitted;

c. VPDES permit numbers for all permits assigned to the facility, or pursuant to which the discharge is authorized;

d. If applying for an aggregated wasteload allocation in accordance with Part I B 2 of this permit, a list of all affected facilities and the VPDES permit numbers assigned to these facilities;

e. For new and expanded facilities, a plan to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads, including the amount of wasteload allocation acquired. Wasteload allocations or credits sufficient to offset projected nutrient loads must be provided for period of at least five years; and

f. For existing facilities, the amount of a facility's wasteload allocation transferred to or from another facility to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion.

[ g. For facilities subject to a floating wasteload allocation as listed in 9VAC25-820-80 with an approved reclamation and reuse system, an indication of whether the allocation should be based on discharged or treated flow. Facilities choosing to base their floating wasteload allocation on treated flow shall provide a water reclamation and reuse flow schematic and a description of how total flows discharged to the reuse distribution system will be measured. ]

2. The registration statement shall be submitted to the DEQ Central Office, Office of VPDES Permits. Following notification from the department of the start date for the required electronic submission of Notices of Intent to Discharge forms (i.e., registration statements), as provided for in 9VAC25-31-1020, such form submitted after that date shall be electronically submitted to the department in compliance with this section and 9VAC25-31-1020. ~~At least three months' notice shall be provided between the notification from the department and the date after which such forms must be submitted electronically.~~ [ ~~There shall be at least three months of notice provided between the notification from the department and the date after which such forms must be submitted electronically.~~ At least three months' notice shall be provided between the notification from the department and the date after which such forms must be submitted electronically. ]

3. An amended registration statement shall be submitted to DEQ immediately upon the acquisition or transfer of a facility's wasteload allocation to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion.

I. Public notice for registration statements proposing modifications or incorporations of new wasteload allocations or delivery factors.

1. All public notices issued pursuant to a proposed modification or incorporation of a (i) new wasteload allocation to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads from a new discharge or expansion or (ii) delivery factor shall be published once a week for two consecutive weeks in a local newspaper of general circulation serving the locality where the facility is located informing the public that the owner of the facility intends to apply for coverage under this general permit. At a minimum, the notice shall include:

a. A statement of the owner's intent to register for coverage under this general permit;

b. A brief description of the facility and its location;

c. The amount of wasteload allocation that will be acquired or transferred if applicable;

d. The delivery factor for a new discharge or expansion;

e. If applicable, any proposed nonpoint source to point source trading ratio less than 2:1 proposed under Part II B 1 b (1);

f. A statement that the purpose of the public participation is to acquaint the public with the technical aspects of the facility and how the standards and the requirements of this chapter will be met, to identify issues of concern, to facilitate communication, and to establish a dialogue between the owner and persons who may be affected by the discharge from the facility;

g. An announcement of a 30-day comment period and the name, telephone number, and address of the owner's representative who can be contacted by the interested persons to answer questions;

h. The name, telephone number, and address of the DEQ representative who can be contacted by the interested persons to answer questions, or where comments shall be sent; and

i. The location where copies of the documentation to be submitted to the department in support of this general permit notification and any supporting documents can be viewed and copied.

2. The owner shall place a copy of the documentation and support documents in a location accessible to the public in the vicinity of the proposed facility.

3. The public shall be provided 30 days to comment on the technical and the regulatory aspects of the proposal. The comment period will begin on the date the notice is published in the local newspaper.

J. Compliance with wasteload allocations.

1. Methods of compliance. The owner of the permitted facility shall comply with its wasteload allocation contained in the registration list maintained by the department. The owner of the permitted facility shall be in compliance with its wasteload allocation if:

a. The annual mass load is less than or equal to the applicable wasteload allocation assigned to the facility in this general permit (or permitted design capacity for expanded facilities without allocations);

b. The owner of the permitted facility acquires sufficient point source nitrogen or phosphorus credits in accordance with subdivision 2 of this subsection; provided, however, that the acquisition of nitrogen or phosphorus credits pursuant to this section shall not alter or otherwise affect the individual wasteload allocations for each permitted facility; or

c. In the event he is unable to meet the individual wasteload allocation pursuant to subdivision 1 a or 1 b of this subsection, the owner of the permitted facility acquires sufficient nitrogen or phosphorus credits through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund pursuant to subdivision 3 of this subsection; provided, however, that the acquisition of nitrogen or phosphorus credits pursuant to this section shall not alter or otherwise affect the individual wasteload allocations for each permitted facility.

2. Credit acquisition from owners of permitted facilities. A permittee may acquire point source nitrogen credits or point source phosphorus credits from one or more owners of permitted facilities only if:

a. The credits are generated and applied to a compliance obligation in the same calendar year;

b. The credits are generated by one or more permitted facilities in the same tributary, except that owners of permitted facilities in the Eastern Shore Basin may also acquire credits from owners of permitted facilities in the Potomac and Rappahannock tributaries. Owners of Eastern Shore Basin facilities may acquire credits from the owners of Potomac tributary facilities at a trading ratio of 1:1. A trading ratio of 1.3:1 shall apply to the acquisition of credits from the owners of a Rappahannock tributary facility by the owner of an Eastern Shore Basin facility;

c. The exchange or acquisition of credits does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations as determined by the board;

d. The credits are acquired no later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are applied;

e. The credits are generated by a facility that has been constructed, and has discharged from treatment works whose design flow or equivalent industrial activity is the basis for the facility's wasteload allocations (until a facility is constructed and has commenced operation, such credits are held, and may be sold, by the Nutrient Offset Fund; and

f. No later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are applied, the permittee certifies on a credit exchange notification form supplied by the department that he has acquired sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations. The permittee shall comply with the terms and conditions contained in the credit exchange notification form submitted to the department.

3. Credit acquisitions from the Nutrient Offset Fund. Until such time as the board finds that no allocations are reasonably available in an individual tributary, permittees that cannot meet their total nitrogen or total phosphorus effluent limit may acquire nitrogen or phosphorus credits through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund established in § 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia only if, no later than June 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the credits are to be applied, the permittee certifies on a form supplied by the department that he has diligently sought, but has been unable to acquire, sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations through the acquisition of point source nitrogen or phosphorus credits with other permitted facilities, and that he has acquired sufficient credits to satisfy his compliance obligations through one or more payments made in accordance with the terms of this general permit. Such certification may include providing a record of solicitation or demonstration that point source allocations are not available for sale in the tributary in which the permittee's facility is located. Payments to the Nutrient Offset Fund shall be in the amount of $5.08 for each pound of nitrogen and $11.15 for each pound of phosphorus and shall be subject to the following requirements:

a. The credits are generated and applied to a compliance obligation in the same calendar year.

b. The credits are generated in the same tributary, except that owners of permitted facilities in the Eastern Shore Basin may also acquire credits from the owners of facilities that discharge to the Potomac and Rappahannock tributaries. Owners of Eastern Shore Basin facilities may acquire credits from the owners of facilities that discharge to a Potomac tributary at a trading ratio of 1:1. A trading ratio of 1.3:1 shall apply to the acquisition of credits from owners of facilities that discharge to a Rappahannock tributary by the owners of an Eastern Shore Basin facility.

c. The acquisition of credits does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations, as determined by the board.

4. This general permit neither requires nor prohibits a municipality or regional sewerage authority's development and implementation of trading programs among industrial users, which are consistent with the pretreatment regulatory requirements at 40 CFR Part 403 and the municipality's or authority's individual VPDES permit.

Part II

SPECIAL CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO NEW AND EXPANDED FACILITIES

A. Offsetting mass loads discharged by new and expanded facilities.

1. An owner of a new or expanded facility shall comply with the applicable requirements of this section as a condition of the facility's coverage under this general permit.

a. An owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit first issued before July 1, 2005, that expands the facility to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day, or an equivalent load, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset any increase in his delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads resulting from any expansion beyond his permitted capacity as of July 1, 2005.

b. An owner of a facility authorized by a VPDES permit first issued on or after July 1, 2005, to discharge 40,000 gallons or more per day, or an equivalent load, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset his delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads.

c. An owner of a facility treating domestic sewage authorized by a VPDES permit with a discharge greater than 1,000 gallons per day up to and including 39,999 gallons per day that did not commence the discharge of pollutants prior to January 1, 2011, shall demonstrate to the department that he has acquired wasteload allocations sufficient to offset his delivered total nitrogen and delivered phosphorus loads prior to commencing the discharge, except when the facility is for short-term temporary use only as determined by the department or when treatment of domestic sewage is not the primary purpose of the facility.

2. Offset calculations shall address the proposed discharge that exceeds:

a. The applicable wasteload allocation assigned to discharges from the facility in this general permit, for expanding significant dischargers with a wasteload allocation listed in 9VAC25-720-50 C, 9VAC25-720-60 C, 9VAC25-720-70 C, 9VAC25-720-110 C, and 9VAC25-720-120 C of the Water Quality Management Planning Regulation;

b. The permitted design capacity, for all other expanding dischargers; and

c. Zero, for facilities with a new discharge.

3. An owner of multiple facilities that discharge into the same tributary, and assigned an aggregate mass load limit in accordance with Part I B 2 of this general permit, that undertakes construction of new or expanded facilities shall be required to acquire wasteload allocations sufficient to offset any increase in delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads resulting from any expansion beyond the aggregate mass load limit assigned these facilities.

B. Acquisition of wasteload allocations. Wasteload allocations required by this section to offset new or increased delivered total nitrogen and delivered total phosphorus loads shall be acquired in accordance with this section.

1. Such allocations may be acquired from one or a combination of the following:

a. Acquisition of all or a portion of the wasteload allocations or point source nitrogen or point source phosphorus credits from the owners of one or more permitted facilities, based on delivered pounds by the respective trading parties as listed by the department;

b. Acquisition of credits certified by the board pursuant to § 62.1-44.19:20 of the Code of Virginia. Credits used to offset new or increased nutrient loads under this subdivision shall be:

(1) Subject to a trading ratio of two pounds reduced for every pound to be discharged if certified as a nonpoint source credit by the board pursuant to § 62.1-44.19:20 of the Code of Virginia. On a case-by-case basis the board may approve nonpoint source to source trading ratios of less than 2:1 (but not less than 1:1) when the applicant demonstrates factors that ameliorate the presumed 2:1 uncertainty ratio for credits generation by nonpoint sources such as:

(a) When direct and representative monitoring of the pollutant loadings from a nonpoint source is performed in a manner and at a frequency similar to that performed at VPDES point sources and there is consistency in the effectiveness of the operation of the nonpoint source best management practice (BMP) approaching that of a conventional point source.

(b) When nonpoint source credits are generated from land conservation that ensures permanent protection through a conservation easement or other instrument attached to the deed and when load reductions can be reliably determined;

(2) Calculated using best management practices efficiency rates and attenuation rates, as established by the latest science and relevant technical information, and approved by the board;

(3) Based on appropriate delivery factors, as established by the latest science and relevant technical information, and approved by the board;

(4) Demonstrated to have achieved reductions beyond those already required by or funded under federal or state law, or by Virginia's Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan;

(5) Generated in accordance with conditions of the facility's individual VPDES permit; and

(6) In the case of credits generated by land use conversions and urban source reduction controls (BMPs), the credits shall represent nutrient reductions beyond those in place as of July 1, 2005;

c. Until such time as the board finds that no allocations are reasonably available in an individual tributary, acquisition of allocations through payments made into the Nutrient Offset Fund established in § 10.1-2128.2 of the Code of Virginia; or

d. Acquisition of allocations through such other means as may be approved by the department on a case-by-case basis. This includes allocations granted by the board to an owner of a facility that is authorized by a VPA permit to land apply domestic sewage if:

(1) The VPA permit was issued before July 1, 2005;

(2) The allocation does not exceed the facility's permitted design capacity as of July 1, 2005;

(3) The waste treated by the facility that is covered under the VPA permit will be treated and discharged pursuant to a VPDES permit for a new discharge; and

(4) The owner installs state-of-the-art nutrient removal technology at such a facility.

2. Acquisition of allocations or point source nitrogen or point source phosphorus credits is subject to the following conditions:

a. The allocations or credits shall be generated and applied to an offset obligation in the same calendar year in which the credit is generated;

b. The allocations or credits shall be generated in the same tributary;

c. Such acquisition does not affect any requirement to comply with local water quality-based limitations, as determined by the board;

d. The allocations are authenticated (i.e., verified to have been generated) by the permittee as required by the facility's individual VPDES permit, utilizing procedures approved by the board, no later than February 1 immediately following the calendar year in which the allocations are applied; and

e. If obtained from the owner of a permitted point source, the allocations shall be generated by a facility that has been constructed, and has discharged from treatment works whose design flow or equivalent industrial activity is the basis for the facility's wasteload allocations.

f. Such allocations or credits shall be secured for a period of five years with each registration under the general permit.

3. Priority of options. The board shall give priority to allocations or credits acquired in accordance with subdivisions 1 a, b, and d of this subsection. The board shall approve allocations acquired in accordance with subdivision 1 c of this subsection only after the owner has demonstrated that he has made a good faith effort to acquire sufficient allocations in accordance with subdivisions 1 a and 1 b of this subsection, and that such allocations are not reasonably available taking into account timing, cost and other relevant factors. Such demonstration may include providing a record of solicitation, or other demonstration that point source allocations or nonpoint source allocations are not available for sale in the tributary in which the permittee's facility discharge is located.

4. Annual allocation acquisitions from the Nutrient Offset Fund. The cost for each pound of nitrogen and each pound of phosphorus shall be determined at the time payment is made to the Nutrient Offset Fund, based on the higher of (i) the estimated cost of achieving a reduction of one pound of nitrogen or phosphorus at the facility that is securing the allocation, or comparable facility, for each pound of allocation acquired; or (ii) the average cost, as determined by the department on an annual basis, of reducing two pounds of nitrogen or phosphorus from nonpoint sources in the same tributary for each pound of allocation acquired.

Part III

CONDITIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL VPDES PERMITS

A. Monitoring.

1. Samples and measurements taken as required by this permit shall be representative of the monitored activity.

2. Monitoring shall be conducted according to procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or alternative methods approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, unless other procedures have been specified in this permit.

3. The permittee shall periodically calibrate and perform maintenance procedures on all monitoring and analytical instrumentation at intervals that will ensure accuracy of measurements.

4. Samples taken as required by this permit shall be analyzed in accordance with 1VAC30-45 (Certification for Noncommercial Environmental Laboratories) or 1VAC30-46 (Accreditation for Commercial Environmental Laboratories).

B. Records.

1. Records of monitoring information shall include:

a. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;

b. The individuals who performed the sampling or measurements;

c. The dates and times analyses were performed;

d. The individuals who performed the analyses;

e. The analytical techniques or methods used; and

f. The results of such analyses.

2. Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five years, the permittee shall retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the registration statement for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date of the sample, measurement, report, or request for coverage. This period of retention shall be extended automatically during the course of any unresolved litigation regarding the regulated activity or regarding control standards applicable to the permittee or as requested by the board.

C. Reporting monitoring results.

1. The permittee shall submit the results of the monitoring required by this permit not later than the 10th day of the month after monitoring takes place, unless another reporting schedule is specified elsewhere in this permit. Monitoring results shall be submitted to the department's regional office.

2. Monitoring results shall be reported on a Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) or on forms provided, approved, or specified by the department.

3. If the permittee monitors any pollutant specifically addressed by this permit more frequently than required by this permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or using other test procedures approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or using procedures specified in this permit, the results of this monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR or reporting form specified by the department.

4. Calculations for all limitations that require averaging of measurements shall utilize an arithmetic mean unless otherwise specified in this permit.

D. Duty to provide information. The permittee shall furnish to the department, within a reasonable time, any information that the board may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating coverage under this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. The board may require the permittee to furnish, upon request, such plans, specifications, and other pertinent information as may be necessary to determine the effect of the wastes from the discharge on the quality of state waters or such other information as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of the State Water Control Law. The permittee shall also furnish to the department, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit.

E. Compliance schedule reports. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit shall be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date.

F. Unauthorized discharges. Except in compliance with this permit or another permit issued by the board, it shall be unlawful for any person to:

1. Discharge into state waters sewage, industrial wastes, other wastes, or any noxious or deleterious substances; or

2. Otherwise alter the physical, chemical, or biological properties of such state waters and make them detrimental to the public health, to animal or aquatic life, or to the use of such waters for domestic or industrial consumption, for recreation, or for other uses.

G. Reports of unauthorized discharges. Any permittee that discharges or causes or allows a discharge of sewage, industrial waste, other wastes, or any noxious or deleterious substance into or upon state waters in violation of Part III F, or that discharges or causes or allows a discharge that may reasonably be expected to enter state waters in violation of Part III F, shall notify the department of the discharge immediately upon discovery of the discharge, but in no case later than 24 hours after said discovery. A written report of the unauthorized discharge shall be submitted to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge. The written report shall contain:

1. A description of the nature and location of the discharge;

2. The cause of the discharge;

3. The date on which the discharge occurred;

4. The length of time that the discharge continued;

5. The volume of the discharge;

6. If the discharge is continuing, how long it is expected to continue;

7. If the discharge is continuing, what the expected total volume of the discharge will be; and

8. Any steps planned or taken to reduce, eliminate, and prevent a recurrence of the present discharge or any future discharge not authorized by this permit.

Discharges reportable to the department under the immediate reporting requirements of other regulations are exempted from this requirement.

H. Reports of unusual or extraordinary discharges. If any unusual or extraordinary discharge including a bypass or upset should occur from a treatment works and the discharge enters or could be expected to enter state waters, the permittee shall promptly notify, in no case later than 24 hours, the department by telephone after the discovery of the discharge. This notification shall provide all available details of the incident, including any adverse effects on aquatic life and the known number of fish killed. The permittee shall reduce the report to writing and shall submit it to the department within five days of discovery of the discharge in accordance with Part III I 2. Unusual and extraordinary discharges include, but are not limited to, any discharge resulting from:

1. Unusual spillage of materials resulting directly or indirectly from processing operations;

2. Breakdown of processing or accessory equipment;

3. Failure or taking out of service some or all of the treatment works; and

4. Flooding or other acts of nature.

I. Reports of noncompliance. The permittee shall report any noncompliance that may adversely affect state waters or may endanger public health.

1. An oral report shall be provided within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The following shall be included as information that shall be reported within 24 hours under this paragraph:

a. Any unanticipated bypass; and

b. Any upset that causes a discharge to surface waters.

2. A written report shall be submitted within five days and shall contain:

a. A description of the noncompliance and its cause;

b. The period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and

c. Steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.

The board may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports of noncompliance under Part III I if the oral report has been received within 24 hours and no adverse impact on state waters has been reported.

3. The permittee shall report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Part III I 1 or 2, in writing, at the time the next monitoring reports are submitted. The reports shall contain the information listed in Part III I 2.

NOTE: The immediate (within 24 hours) reports required in Part III G, H, and I may be made to the department's regional office. Reports may be made by telephone, FAX, or online at ~~https://portal.deq.virginia.gov/prep/Report/Create~~ https://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/PollutionResponse Preparedness/MakingaReport.aspx [ . ] . For reports outside normal working hours, a message may be left and this shall fulfill the immediate reporting requirement. For emergencies, the Virginia Department of Emergency Management maintains a 24-hour telephone service at 1-800-468-8892.

4. ~~Where~~ When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit registration statement or submitted incorrect information in a permit registration statement or in any report to the department, the permittee shall promptly submit such facts or information.

J. Notice of planned changes.

1. The permittee shall give notice to the department as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when:

a. The permittee plans alteration or addition to any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a discharge of pollutants, the construction of which commenced:

(1) After promulgation of standards of performance under § 306 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1251 et seq.) that are applicable to such source; or

(2) After proposal of standards of performance in accordance with § 306 of the Clean Water Act that are applicable to such source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with § 306 of the Clean Water Act within 120 days of their proposal;

b. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants that are subject neither to effluent limitations nor to notification requirements specified elsewhere in this permit; or

c. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or of disposal practices, and such alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or of disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan.

2. The permittee shall give advance notice to the department of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity that may result in noncompliance with permit requirements.

K. Signatory requirements.

1. Registration statement. All registration statements shall be signed as follows:

a. For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this section, a responsible corporate officer means (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy-making or decision-making functions for the corporation or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or other actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit registration requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures;

b. For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or

c. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: by either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a public agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency.

2. Reports, etc. All reports required by permits and other information requested by the board shall be signed by a person described in Part III K 1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:

a. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part III K 1;

b. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position; and

c. The written authorization is submitted to the department.

3. Changes to authorization. If an authorization under Part III K 2 is no longer accurate because a different individual or position has responsibility for the overall operation of the facility, a new authorization satisfying the requirements of Part III K 2 shall be submitted to the department prior to or together with any reports, or information to be signed by an authorized representative.

4. Certification. Any person signing a document under Part III K 1 or 2 shall make the following certification:

"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations."

L. Duty to comply. The permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the State Water Control Law and the Clean Water Act, except that noncompliance with certain provisions of this permit may constitute a violation of the State Water Control Law but not the Clean Water Act. Permit noncompliance is grounds for enforcement action, permit coverage termination, or denial of a permit coverage renewal application.

The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under § 307(a) of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants and with standards for sewage sludge use or disposal established under § 405(d) of the Clean Water Act within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards or prohibitions or standards for sewage sludge use or disposal, even if this permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement.

M. Duty to reapply. If the permittee wishes to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, the permittee shall submit a new registration statement at least 60 days before the expiration date of the existing permit, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the board. The board shall not grant permission for registration statements to be submitted later than the expiration date of the existing permit.

N. Effect of a permit. This permit does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or invasion of personal rights or any infringement of federal, state, or local law or regulations.

O. State law. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action under, or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to, any other state law or regulation or under authority preserved by § 510 of the Clean Water Act. Except as provided in permit conditions on "bypassing" (Part III U) and "upset" (Part III V), nothing in this permit shall be construed to relieve the permittee from civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance.

P. Oil and hazardous substance liability. Nothing in this permit shall be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties to which the permittee is or may be subject under §§ 62.1-44.34:14 through 62.1-44.34:23 of the State Water Control Law.

Q. Proper operation and maintenance. The permittee shall at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) that are installed or used by the permittee to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also include effective plant performance, adequate funding, adequate staffing, and adequate laboratory and process controls, including appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of back-up or auxiliary facilities or similar systems that are installed by the permittee only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit.

R. Disposal of solids or sludges. Solids, sludges, or other pollutants removed in the course of treatment or management of pollutants shall be disposed of in a manner so as to prevent any pollutant from such materials from entering state waters.

S. Duty to mitigate. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal in violation of this permit that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment.

T. Need to halt or reduce activity not a defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

U. Bypass.

1. "Bypass" means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility. The permittee may allow any bypass to occur that does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to ensure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Part III U 2 and 3.

2. Notice.

a. Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, prior notice shall be submitted, if possible, at least 10 days before the date of the bypass.

b. Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Part III I.

3. Prohibition of bypass.

a. Bypass is prohibited, and the board may take enforcement action against a permittee for bypass, unless:

(1) Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;

(2) There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime. This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass that occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and

(3) The permittee submitted notices as required under Part III U 2.

b. The board may approve an anticipated bypass after considering its adverse effects if the board determines that it will meet the three conditions listed in Part III U 3 a.

V. Upset.

1. An upset, defined in 9VAC25-31-10, constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with technology-based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of Part III V 2 are met. A determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is not a final administrative action subject to judicial review.

2. A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset shall demonstrate through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:

a. An upset occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause or causes of the upset;

b. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated;

c. The permittee submitted notice of the upset as required in Part III I; and

d. The permittee complied with remedial measures required under Part III S.

3. In any enforcement proceeding the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.

W. Inspection and entry. The permittee shall allow the director, or an authorized ~~representative, including~~ representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of the ~~administrator,~~ administrator) upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to:

1. Enter upon the permittee's premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

3. Inspect at reasonable times facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and

4. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act and the State Water Control Law, substances or parameters at any location.

For purposes of this section, the time for inspection shall be deemed reasonable during regular business hours or whenever the facility is discharging. Nothing contained herein shall make an inspection unreasonable during an emergency.

X. Permit actions. Permits may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination, or notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.

Y. Transfer of permit coverage. Permit coverage is not transferable to any person except after notice to the department. Coverage under this permit may be automatically transferred to a new permittee if:

1. The current permittee notifies the department within 30 days of the transfer of the title to the facility or property, unless permission for a later date has been granted by the board;

2. The notice includes a written agreement between the existing and new permittees containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between them; and

3. The board does not notify the existing permittee and the proposed new permittee of its intent to deny the new permittee coverage under the permit. If this notice is not received, the transfer is effective on the date specified in the agreement described in Part III Y 2.

Z. Severability. The provisions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstance is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.

9VAC25-820-80 Facilities subject to reduced ~~inidividual~~ individual total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations

~~The James River facilities identified in this section are subject to reduced individual total nitrogen and total phosphorus wasteload allocations as indicated.~~

~~Facility~~	~~VPDES No.~~	~~Phase 1~~ ~~Total Nitrogen (lbs/yr)~~	~~Phase 2~~ ~~Total Nitrogen (lbs/yr)~~	~~Phase 2~~ ~~Total Phosphorus (lbs/yr)~~
~~Buena Vista STP~~	~~VA0020991~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~2,778~~
~~Covington STP~~	~~VA0025542~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~3,705~~
~~GP Big Island LLC~~	~~VA0003026~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~40,273~~
~~Mohawk Industries, Inc.~~	~~VA0004677~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~9,880~~
~~Lexington - Rockbridge Regional WQCF~~	~~VA0088161~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~3,705~~
~~Alleghany County - Low Moor STP~~	~~VA0027979~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~617~~
~~Lower Jackson River STP~~	~~VA0090671~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~1,852~~
~~Clifton Forge STP~~	~~VA0022772~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~2,470~~
~~MeadWestvaco~~	~~VA0003646~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~96,771~~
~~Amherst - Rutledge Creek WWTP~~	~~VA0031321~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~741~~
~~BWX Technologies Inc.~~	~~VA0003697~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~1,235~~
~~Greif Inc.~~	~~VA0006408~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~24,082~~
~~Lake Monticello STP~~	~~VA0024945~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~1,229~~
~~Lynchburg STP (DWF only)~~	~~VA0024970~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~27,169~~
~~RWSA - Moores Creek Regional STP~~	~~VA0025518~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~18,525~~
~~Powhatan CC STP~~	~~VA0020699~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~581~~
~~Crewe WWTP~~	~~VA0020303~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~617~~
~~Farmville WWTP~~	~~VA0083135~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~2,964~~
~~Richmond WWTP (DWF only)~~	~~VA0063177~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~55,574~~
~~E. I. DuPont - Spruance~~	~~VA0004669~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~6,339~~
~~Chesterfield County - Falling Creek WWTP~~	~~VA0024996~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~12,473~~
~~Chesterfield County - Proctors Creek WWTP~~	~~VA0060194~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~33,344~~
~~Dominion - Chesterfield (Net)~~	~~VA0004146~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~170~~
~~Henrico County WWTP~~	~~VA0063690~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~92,623~~
~~The Sustainability Park LLC~~	~~VA0002780~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~1,556~~
~~Philip Morris USA - Park 500~~	~~VA0026557~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~2,149~~
~~Honeywell - Hopewell~~	~~VA0005291~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~41,841~~
~~Hopewell Regional WTF~~	~~VA0066630~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~61,749~~
~~South Central WW Authority WWTF~~	~~VA0025437~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~28,404~~
~~Tyson Foods - Glen Allen~~	~~VA0004031~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~409~~
~~Chickahominy WWTP~~	~~VA0088480~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~123~~
~~HRSD - Boat Harbor STP~~	~~VA0081256~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~43,177~~
~~HRSD - James River STP~~	~~VA0081272~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~34,541~~
~~HRSD - Williamsburg STP~~	~~VA0081302~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~38,859~~
~~HRSD - Nansemond STP~~	~~VA0081299~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~51,812~~
~~HRSD - Army Base STP~~	~~VA0081230~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~31,087~~
~~HRSD - Virginia Initiative Plant WWTP~~	~~VA0081281~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~69,083~~
~~HRSD - Chesapeake - Elizabeth STP~~	~~VA0081264~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~41,450~~
HRSD Aggregate Nutrient Discharge*	~~N/A~~	~~4,400,000~~	~~3,400,000~~	~~310,010~~
~~JH Miles and Company~~	~~VA0003263~~	~~N/A~~	~~N/A~~	~~17,437~~
^*HRSD James River Aggregate includes Boat Harbor STP (VA0081256), James River STP (VA0081272), Williamsburg STP (VA0081302), Nansemond STP (VA0081299), Army Base STP (VA0081230), Virginia Initiative STP (VA0081281), and Chesapeake - Elizabeth STP (VA0081264).

[ ~~A. Floating wasteload allocations.~~

~~Facility~~	~~VPDES No.~~
~~ACSA - Middle River Regional WWTP~~	~~VA0064793~~
~~North River WWTF~~	~~VA0060640~~
~~Waynesboro WWTP~~	~~VA0025151~~
~~Front Royal WWTP~~	~~VA0062812~~
~~Broad Run WRF~~	~~VA0091383~~
~~Leesburg WPCF~~	~~VA0092282~~
~~VA American Water Prince William - Section 1 WWTF~~	~~VA0024724~~
~~VA American Water Prince William - Section 8 WWTF~~	~~VA0024678~~
~~H. L. Mooney WWTF~~	~~VA0025101~~
~~Opequan WRF~~	~~VA065552~~
~~Parkins Mill WWTF~~	~~VA0075191~~
~~Alexandria Renew Enterprises WWTP~~	~~VA0025160~~
~~Arlington County WPCF~~	~~VA0025143~~
~~Noman M Cole Jr PCP~~	~~VA0025364~~
~~Aquia WWTP~~	~~VA0060968~~
~~Culpeper WWTP~~	~~VA0061590~~
~~FMC WWTF~~	~~VA0068110~~
~~Fredericksburg WWTF~~	~~VA0025127~~
~~Little Falls Run WWTF~~	~~VA0076392~~
~~Massaponax WWTF~~	~~VA0025658~~
~~HRSD - York River STP~~	~~VA0081311~~
~~Totopotomoy WWTP~~	~~VA0089915~~
~~Lynchburg STP~~	~~VA0024970~~
~~Moores Creek Advanced WRRF~~	~~VA0025518~~
~~Falling Creek WWTP~~	~~VA0024996~~
~~Henrico County WWTP~~	~~VA0063690~~
~~Hopewell WWTP~~	~~VA0066630~~
~~HRSD - Boat Harbor STP~~	~~VA0081256~~
~~HRSD - James River STP~~	~~VA0081272~~
~~HRSD - Williamsburg STP~~	~~VA0081302~~
~~Proctor's Creek WWTP~~	~~VA0060194~~
~~Richmond WWTP~~	~~VA0063177~~
~~South Central Wastewater Authority WWTP~~	~~VA0025437~~
~~HRSD - Nansemond STP~~	~~VA0081299~~
~~HRSD - Army Base STP~~	~~VA0081230~~
~~HRSD - VIP WWTP~~	~~VA0081281~~

A. Enhanced Nutrient Removal Certainty Program Facilities

Facility	VPDES No.
HRSD - York River STP	VA0081311
HRSD - Boat Harbor STP	VA0081256
HRSD - James River STP	VA0081272
HRSD - Williamsburg STP	VA0081302
HRSD - Nansemond STP	VA0081299
HRSD - Army Base STP	VA0081230
HRSD - VIP WWTP	VA0081281 ]

B.Chlorophyll-a based total phosphorus wasteload allocations.

Facility	VPDES No.
Richmond WWTP	VA0063177
Falling Creek WWTP	VA0024996
Proctor's Creek WWTP	VA0060194
Henrico County WWTP	VA0063690
Phillip Morris - Park 500	VA0026557
Hopewell WWTP	[ ~~VA0063690~~ VA0066630 ]
South Central Wastewater Authority WWTP	VA0025437