Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of Health Professions
 
Board
Board of Counseling
 
chapter
Regulations Governing the Practice of Professional Counseling [18 VAC 115 ‑ 20]
Action Requirement for CACREP accreditation for educational programs
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 7/14/2017
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
6/19/17  3:12 pm
Commenter: Jasmine Griffin, George Mason University

No on CACREP only!
 

There are several reasons why I as a future counselor oppose CACREP only requirement. CACREP requirements consist of 6-7 sections with minuscule mention of multicultural or social justice consideration or competence. The United States is a nation built upon the ability of many cultures and ethnic groups to come together and collaborate with one another. There is strong research to support culture influences not only the symptoms associated with a disorder, but if and how clients seek help, and who they seek it from. To make these areas of knowledge and competence optional handicaps future counselors in their ability to effectively treat the populations they will come into contact with. Requiring CACREP as the only accrediting entity also limits the diversity of therapists. CACREP is not the only accreditation entity with high training standards. Other accrediting entities have just as stringent standards and in some ways stronger, more inclusive training requirements. Finally, I believe the current requirements limiting future therapists to CACREP accredited programs will harm the growth of this field, as well as limit essential access to effective mental health providers in Virginia. This is why i say no on CACREP only!

CommentID: 60334