Virginia Regulatory Town Hall
Agency
Department of General Services
 
Board
Department of General Services
 
chapter
Regulations Banning Concealed Firearms in Offices Occupied by Executive Branch Agencies [1 VAC 30 ‑ 105]
Action Promulgation of new regulation banning concealed firearms in executive branch agency offices
Stage Proposed
Comment Period Ended on 10/21/2016
spacer
Previous Comment     Next Comment     Back to List of Comments
8/31/16  1:07 am
Commenter: Jeremiah Hansen

Unconstitutional ban infringes on us all
 

This proposed ban is unconstitutional as it limits the rights of the people to defend themselves and others without due cause or due process. This infringes on their right to do so, not only at the location but to and from the executive building, unless they can properly secure the firearm in their vehicle or other location. There is no pressing need to ensure concealed carry holders are disarmed. They have shown themselves to be the least likely to commit any crime, let alone a violent one. Concealed carry holders have passed background checks and must be able to continue to do so to retain the license. There is no reason or due process requirement that would make such a ban constitutional. The ban is, and would be if made permanent, an illegal infringement on the rights of the people.

Furthermore, the ban would reduce the number of responders to a terrorist attack in the vicinity of an executive building. There have been multiple terrorist attacks in the US and Europe, many involving unsophisticated attacks that both police and citizens stand an excellent chance of defending against. It would potentially help blunt the ambush of officers near executive buildings, which would include State Police buildings. The mere chance it would help save lives of citizens and police make this ban a foolish step. The bans on firearm possession did nothing to stop the San Bernardino and Orlando attacks. There is no reason to believe they would improve the defense of Virginians.

Imposition of the ban on citizens, but not police or other groups creates division. There is no reason to make the rights of a police officer, or any other group, of higher priority than any other. The core of the argument has been proven false over the last two centuries when it has been used to subjugate and suppress cultures and people. I thought we had moved beyond that, but apparently not. We are all equal and deserve the same right to personal defense as any officer, teacher, Delegate, Senator, or Governor. This is true on a farm and it is true at the state capital.

Remove this ban and preserve the rights of all Virginians.

CommentID: 53064